Claude: “This project will take 1 year to complete” Me:

Again 😅 My cat scared everyone with this costume 😂

Please do not use this feature unless you're literally about to die. We need our chargers

BREAKING: After reports of Delta CEO’s remarks about Elon Musk, United and American Airlines invite customers to switch without losing status. Both airlines chose Starlink.

i still think about this ngl

Elon Musk Said The Unthinkable in Front of Trump

Best way to sandbox an AI is to put it on a Delta flight – it will have no chance of accessing the Internet!

We're giving away a CONTROL Resonant custom wrapped NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 to celebrate its official release with #RTXON. To enter: 🟢 Share this post 🟢 Comment #RTXON T&Cs: nvda.ws/4z24Gcq

The Go/No-Go poll for orbit on Starship flight 14 felt like a movie scene, so I scored it as if it was

Oggi in UE si fa un altro passo verso il totalitarismo. Questa mattina Parlamento europeo, governi dell’UE e Commissione si incontrano per discutere il testo del chat control 2.0. Non è una votazione in aula. È un negoziato a porte chiuse in cui discuteranno se le piattaforme potranno continuare a setacciare messaggi privati, e con quali modalità. I governi propongono i cosiddetti "piani di ricerca": un'autorità potrebbe autorizzare per mesi lo scanning di intere parti di un servizio (chat, email), non solo di persone sotto inchiesta. Un controllo massivo sulle comunicazioni di 450 milioni di persone alla ricerca di "reati". Ufficialmente, infatti, questa proposta servirebbe a combattere la pedopornografia online. Più realisticamente, serve a creare una infrastruttura di controllo totale che poi sarà utilissima per azioni di censura, controllo dell'opinione pubblica e rimozione di contenuti.

Reality: Despite an engine anomaly, Starship 41 successfully reached orbit and then splashed down in the ocean as planned. Media: Musk’s rocket lost an engine, then blew up.

Well then.

귀여워

Every time you let Opus 5.5 run a long task on its own, have it vibe-code a quick 𝗛𝗧𝗠𝗟 𝗱𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱 like this first. Then give it 𝗮 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝘀 𝗱𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀: → Name it dashboard-builder, set its effort to medium, and preload a design skill → The first time, it asks what style you like and saves it to memory. After that, every dashboard fits your taste and the task at hand → Call it before every long task. It builds the dashboard in the background in about two minutes, and the main session keeps coding on high without stopping → The dashboard shows four things: task progress, what's stuck, questions waiting on you, and what it'll do by default if you don't answer Send this prompt to Claude Code 👇 "Set up a subagent that only builds progress dashboards: 1. Create dashboard-builder in ~/.claude/agents: model: opus, effort: medium, memory: user. Preload the design skills I have installed (for example impeccable). It can only read and write the .dashboard/ folder and its own memory. 2. The first time, it asks me what style I like: dark or light, dense or airy, and one accent color. It saves my answer to memory and follows it every time. Pick the panels for the current task; don't use a template. 3. The dashboard is one HTML file showing tasks and their status, questions waiting for me with the default action, the latest deliverables, and anything stuck. Use the real clock for every time. It opens with a double-click and refreshes itself every 10 seconds. 4. Add a rule to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: for any task with more than 5 steps or that should take longer than 30 minutes, have dashboard-builder set up the dashboard before starting; update it after every step; when you need a decision from me, add it to the questions list and keep going with the default. Show me the contents of the files you'll create or change, then explain the whole flow in words a 10-year-old could follow. Don't write anything until I confirm."

Opus 5.5 communicates more naturally, addressing some of the most common feedback we heard on Opus 5. It puts the most important information up front and follows the writing rules you give it, which makes long sessions easier to follow.

지난 몇일 간 많은 사랑을 받았습니다. 이에 유사 사이트가 생겨나고 있는 거 같네요. 사이트 제작은 처음부터 트위터 친구들에게 공유할 목적이었고, 프롬프트 자체는 앞으로도 오픈소스 정신에 입각하여 제공될 예정입니다. 프롬프트 제공 사이트는 grokbot-icon-studio.serio-ai… 한 곳이며 현재는 chatgpt.site 로 운영됩니다. 그 외의 곳들은 전부 사칭이니 주의해 주세요. 특히 전 여러분께 해당 프롬프트로 그 어떤 비용을 청구하지 않습니다. 생성에 비용을 청구하는 사이트를 주의하세요. 대표적 사칭 사이트 1. grokbot-icon.me/ 갤러리에 허가 없이 사용자 여러분의 그림을 무단 복제하고 있습니다. 2. grokboticon.com/ 생성에 매우 높은 비용을 청구하고 있습니다. 친구들이 그거 어떻게 만들어? 하면 그냥 제 트윗 주소를 알려 주세요. 이후는 친구들에게 맡기구요.

Ok, we now have the actual text of the Greenland deal (whitehouse.gov/briefings-sta…), so we can say how it compares to the existing 1951 arrangement and who, between Trump and Denmark, lied the most in their framing of it. Long story short - which may surprise some - the Danes lied the most: Trump is pretty much correct in saying that this new deal grants the US control of Greenland. Let's look into what changed compared to the 1951 deal. 1) This is now a permanent arrangement: whereas the existing 1951 deal only lasted as long as NATO existed, this one "does not have an end date and may only be amended by mutual consent." It even survives a hypothetical future independence of Greenland: in that event, Denmark and Greenland must ensure that the independent Greenlandic state "affirmatively assume[s] all of the rights and obligations of the Kingdom of Denmark specified in this Agreement." 2) In the 1951 agreement, the US could set up bases only where both governments agreed, and only on the basis of NATO planning. The new deal locks in three bases: the US can "modernize and expand its activities" at Pituffik, its only base in Greenland until now, and "shall be allowed to establish an additional Defense Area at Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig." Further bases beyond these 3 can be justified by the defense of "the American continent," a US interest rather than a NATO one. Also, quite subtle but this is interesting: Article IV(iii) says that "the United States may establish additional defense areas in Greenland" and that consultations are then held "to decide implementation details based on mutual agreement." What this means is that the principle of a new base is automatically granted and only the implementation details require agreement. Article VII also gives the US "the right to raise concerns regarding construction, or change of use" of any building near a US base, after which the parties decide together what to do. Which means that the US has a say over civilian planning around its bases. 3) On US military movement across Greenland, the wording change between the 1951 agreement and this new one is quite funny. The 1951 text said (Art. V(3)): the US "may enjoy... the right of free access to and movement between the defense areas through Greenland, including territorial waters, by land, air and sea," but only "in accordance with general rules mutually agreed upon and issued by the appropriate Danish authority in Greenland." The new one says: "the United States of America shall enjoy... the right of free access to and movement between the Defense Areas through Greenland, including the Territorial Waters, by land, air and sea." That's it: "May" becomes "shall," and the US military movement no longer has to follow rules "issued by the appropriate Danish authority in Greenland." The US also gets something new on top: "undersea access to and movement within the Territorial Waters," i.e. submarines. 4) Non-NATO exclusion: non-NATO states are barred from military installations or a persistent presence in Greenland unless all three parties approve, giving the US an effective permanent veto. The 1951 deal had no equivalent clause. 5) Investment screening: this is entirely new. "States or investors from a state that is not a member of NATO, a NATO partner, or an EU member state" (i.e. Russia, China, India, the Gulf States, etc.), "shall not be allowed to have (i) control, (ii) significant influence, or (iii) access to non-public information...within Particularly Sensitive Sectors or Activities in the territory of Greenland (including the Territorial Waters), unless agreed between the Parties." Again, it basically means that the US has a permanent veto over who can invest in strategic sectors in Greenland, as far as non-NATO or EU states are concerned. 6) Lastly, in stark contrast with the 1951 deal, the framing of the deal changes significantly: this new deal is largely framed around the US. The 1951 agreement existed only "for the benefit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization." The new one lists the defense of "the American continent" as an objective, celebrates "the irreplaceable role" of the United States military as well as "the United States' indispensable historical and ongoing contributions to the security and defense of Greenland," and names the establishment of Trump's "Golden Dome" missile defense system as a key goal. So, to sum up: - The US secured a permanent military foothold that even an independent Greenland would inherit whether it likes it or not - The US now has veto power over any non-NATO military presence in Greenland, and over who can invest in its strategic infrastructure and resources (beyond NATO and the EU) - Denmark signed away its say over the principle of new US bases, with only the right to discuss the "implementation details" - Danish authorities no longer set the rules for US military movement across the island - And all of it is now justified by the defense of "the American continent" I don't know in which universe this even remotely "recognizes the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Kingdom and the Greenlandic people's right to self-determination," as Danish PM Mette Frederiksen put it (stm.dk/en/press/press-releas…). Yes, the preamble of the text cynically "reaffirms" Danish sovereignty but, in my book, when you let a foreign country put bases on your soil, move its troops without following your rules and veto who else can come in, in perpetuity, after it spent two years threatening to take you by force, the word for that is anything but "recognized sovereignty" 🤷

I'm filled with hopium bros

Grok bot icons, aiart image from original prompts & 「4x4 この絵柄で、パターンを変えて描いてください。」

500만 찍는거 봤으니 일단 자러 가 보겠습니다. 엔트로픽이 다시 왕좌에 돌아갈지 아니면 Oai가 왕좌를 지킬지 궁금하긴 한데, 어제 너무 많은 일들이 있었고 신경쓰느라 체력이 방전됬네요. 내일 아침이면 리뷰가 많이 올라와 있을 거라 생각합니다. 좋은 밤 되시고. 항상 감사합니다.