Trans woman: does anything, literally anything. Transphobes:

Transphobes: *crying* "Trans.... trans women have a biological... biological advantage at dancing..."

trans rights are human rights btw

lol, the Men's Rights Movement is on your side, along with the rest of the far right. That's why every feminist, LGBTQI, and human rights group called you goons out and anti-fascists keep showing up to protest you 😂

Transphobes: Sex is not assigned at birth. Sex is observed at birth by looking at external genitalia but sex is not observed at birth by looking at external genitalia when it comes to CAIS people. They are male because of internal gonads.

TERFs: No men in women's spaces! Me: What about cleaners, plumbers, electricians, maintenance? TERFs: Don't be so stupid. They're doing their job. Me: Men with jobs don't commit rape? TERFs:: *insert 100 reasons why straight, c/s men should be allowed in women's spaces.*

The "trans people can't change their chromosomes" crowd would just move the goalpost if it were possible for trans people to change their chromosomes.

TERF logic: Your genitals define your sex. If you have a penis you are male. If you have a vagina you are female but CAIS people are not female despite having a vagina they are male because they have internal testes so a male can have a vagina.

The UK’s decision on trans women! Much of the media has misreported the decision, with exaggerated claims such as, “the UK has finally figured out what a woman is”and headlines saying that “trans women aren’t legally women”. The judges were undisciplined with the terminology they used in their decision (which runs to 87 pages) and failed to understand the complexity of the words that formed the bedrock of their reasoning. The all-white, majority-male panel of judges, who refused to hear submissions from any trans people or trans advocacy groups – which goes against fundamental principles of fairness and justice – based their decision on a concept of “biological sex”, which they said “describe[s] the sex of a person at birth”. But this is a faulty approach, as “biological sex” is not a term used in the Equality Act 2010, which only uses the term “sex”.  The Court nevertheless used this phrase 66 times in its judgment, and took it upon itself to provide a simplistic definition of the term, that is contrary to scientific and medical evidence. Indeed,  doctors at the British Medical Association have described the court’s decision as ‘scientifically illiterate’. Babies are assumed to be a particular sex when they are born based only on the appearance of their genitalia. That sex is then assigned to them and recorded on their birth certificate. However, it is widely accepted that sex is not a simple binary classificationbased solely on genitalia at birth. Sex encompasses a multitude of characteristics, including chromosomes, hormones and secondary sexual characteristics. Around the world, approximately one in 2,000 babies are born intersex, that is, they have innate sex characteristics that do not fit medical norms for female or male bodies. For these reasons, some countries, such as New Zealand, allow parents to record a child’s sex on their birth certificates as “indeterminate”, while others (e.g. Germany) allow parents to leave the sex category blank. The scientific community recognises that sex is a spectrum, and while biologists have been building a more nuanced view of sex, the UK decision demonstrates that judges there are yet to catch up. The Court stressed that its role was one of statutory interpretation i.e. to interpret the words in the Equality Act, but then went off on a tangent, using and defining words not in the Act, which undermines the entire decision. The decision is also flawed in its findings in relation to the provisions of the Equality Act that prohibit discrimination on the basis of breastfeeding. The judges found that the prohibition on discriminating against women who are breastfeeding supported their finding that women means only those born female, saying that breastfeeding “obviously applies to biological women only”. However, this is again flawed thinking and contrary to multiple studies that have found that trans women can successfully breastfeed. It will take some time for the practical implications of the ruling to be fully realised, but for now, it is being interpreted as meaning that trans people can be excluded from single-sex spaces such as toilets, change rooms and women’s refuges, without violating the Equality Act, which is actually going beyond the limited scope of the judgment.  This highlights the urgent need for Parliament to modernise the UK Equality Act to reflect contemporary knowledge and understandings of sex and gender. dailymail.co.uk/news/article…

"Trans people have to redefine words to win arguments" If transphobes could project any harder you'd see this on the moon 🤣

Transphobes: A woman is an adult human female that produces large gametes. No wait a woman is an adult human female who is organized around producing large gametes. You can be born a woman. Also transphobes: Why won't trans people take my definition of "woman" seriously?

Intersex people. The statistical ‘outlier’ the gender critical lobby, can never explain away. They firstly have to dismiss it as an inconvenient outlier, and ascribe a binary identity to that person, regardless of the empirical reality that is literally staring them in the face. Because it’s the first opening of the door, that opens up an enquiry, that leads to conclusions, that result with reducing the idea of biological essentialism, to the pile of rubble, it merits. The only binary I ascribe to, is the mathematical one. That there is a presence of something, or there isn’t. Doesn’t matter if it is in one, or million. Therefore: Intersex people are present. Trans people are present. Nonbinary people are present. thepinknews.com/2026/09/21/a…

"Radical feminists" on their way to parrot patriarchal ideology and reduce women down to breeding machines to own the tr%%ns

TERFs, "We protect women!" Woman, "I don't have a problem with trans women." TERFs, "You're an absolute abomination you disgusting, pervert, nonce, bloke! Go and suck dick you penis pandering handmaiden." TERFs, "We protect women!"

As a gay man, I have more in common with the rest of the LGBTQIA+ community than I do with bigoted has-beens whose best work is behind them (like JK Rowling and Graham Linehan) Gender criticals cannot force team themselves with us.

reminds me of this

Transphobes: Lol trans people don't know what a woman is. A woman is an adult human female. Also transphobes:

Terfs do this in my replies multiple times a day though...

Christians: “Stop forcing your worldview on people.” Also Christians: