Lecturer @UniofOxford | Author of a NEW BOOK: ‘A New Axis of Upheaval: North Korea, Russia, China, Iran’ | Organist | Views my own

Oxford/London
Very pleased to announce that my latest book, 'A NEW AXIS OF UPHEAVAL: North Korea, Russia, China, Iran' will be published by @HurstPublishers later this year. Amidst global geopolitical turbulence, there is no better time than the present to understand these dynamics.
8
31
142
17,690
Want to learn more about the themes covered in the podcast? Don’t forget to pre-order my upcoming book @HurstPublishers: A New Axis of Upheaval: North Korea, Russia, China, Iran amazon.co.uk/New-Axis-Upheav…
Delighted to feature on this week’s @TheSpectator @spectator Americano podcast with @Freddygray31 discussing all things China, US, and China’s relations with North Korea. Watch here: piped.video/watch?v=dD8fd8… Listen here: podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcas…
2
1
169
Delighted to feature on this week’s @TheSpectator @spectator Americano podcast with @Freddygray31 discussing all things China, US, and China’s relations with North Korea. Watch here: piped.video/watch?v=dD8fd8… Listen here: podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcas…
1
2
432
Was Shostakovich a wizard @ClassicFM?
1
3
6
1,403
Edward Howell retweeted
What stands out to me is "坚持反对‘台独’的正确立场." Seems to be a subtle shift in language, i.e. the combination of 坚持 (maintain), 反对 (oppose), and 正确立场 (correct position), directed specifically at Washington. Beijing is trying to suggest that opposition to "Taiwan independence" is already an established U.S. position that Washington should "maintain," which it is not. It's incumbent on Washington to re-state long-standing U.S. policy on Taiwan and refute this framing.
First readout from China on Trump-Xi summit. English translation first then Chinese. WASHINGTON, Sept. 24 (Xinhua) -- Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump held talks at the White House on the morning of Sept. 24 local time. Xi Jinping pointed out that the reciprocal visits between the two heads of state in less than six months are unprecedented in the history of China-U.S. relations. President Trump and I have maintained communication through various means, jointly steering the ship of China-U.S. relations. In May of this year, President Trump and I unanimously decided to build a constructive strategic and stable relationship between China and the United States. This new positioning reflects the reality of China-U.S. relations and embodies expectations for the future, representing an important step towards a correct path for the two countries to coexist. We must translate this vision into action, striving towards a direction of cooperation as the mainstay, competition with moderation, controllable differences, and a promising future, forging a correct path for the two major powers to coexist. China and the United States should and can fully achieve mutual benefit and win-win results through pragmatic cooperation, achieve mutual success through healthy competition, properly handle differences while seeking common ground and reserving differences, and build peace by accumulating mutual trust, so that a constructive strategic and stable relationship between China and the United States can better benefit the people of both countries and the people of the world. Xi Jinping emphasized that the new round of consultations between the two sides' economic and trade teams resulted in a new joint arrangement, which is good news for industries, people, and the global economy of both countries. Cooperation is a two-way street; the stability of China-US economic and trade relations requires both extending the list of cooperation areas and narrowing the list of issues. As long as we uphold the spirit of equality, respect, and mutual benefit, we can find a way to resolve problems. He hoped that both sides would meet each other halfway, adhere to a win-win approach, and promote the continued stable and positive development of China-US economic and trade relations. Xi Jinping pointed out that both China and the US are major powers in artificial intelligence. While there is competition, there is also the potential for cooperation. Both sides should leverage their respective strengths rather than be defensive towards each other. The two sides can continue to conduct dialogues on artificial intelligence, exchange views on its risks and benefits, and jointly prevent the misuse and abuse of artificial intelligence. We must maintain human control over artificial intelligence technology, uphold a people-centered and benevolent approach, and ensure that artificial intelligence serves human progress. Xi Jinping stressed that China's position on safeguarding national unity and territorial integrity is very clear. He hoped that the US would adhere to its correct position against "Taiwan independence," handle the Taiwan issue prudently, and lay a solid foundation for China-US strategic cooperation and the development of bilateral relations. President Trump stated that President Xi Jinping's state visit to the United States was a great visit. Both the US and China are major powers, and President Xi and I are good friends, maintaining in-depth and close communication. Under our leadership, US-China relations will certainly improve. The two countries' economic and trade teams achieved new results in a new round of consultations, and both sides should continue dialogue to reach better agreements. Artificial intelligence concerns the future of humanity, and the US and China should maintain dialogue and strengthen cooperation on this issue. The two heads of state also exchanged views on major international and regional issues such as the situation in the Middle East, the Ukraine crisis, and the Korean Peninsula. The two heads of state confirmed their mutual support for successfully hosting the 2026 APEC Leaders' Informal Meeting and the G20 Leaders' Summit. Cai Qi, Wang Yi, He Lifeng, and others participated.
5
45
126
21,989
The Chagos Islands deal should not be “reworked”. It should be scrapped. Quite unclear as to how said UK officials seem to find the whole issue “unclear”.
Exclusive with @EllenAMilligan UK officials say it is unclear how the Chagos Islands deal can be reworked despite Andy Burnham saying he’s reviewing it and Wes Streeting saying it isn’t good enough Burnham and his team do not know how or even if they can reconfigure the agreement, the officials said That means despite the ‘review’ announced at UNGA, in reality there is currently no prospect of a deal proceeding under Trump, as Ellen reported earlier this week A senior British official warns it would not be in the UK’s long-term national interest to drop the deal. They caution ministers against publicly criticising the agreement, as Streeting did earlier, because the UK would likely pursue it again in future So where does that leave Chagos and Burnham’s ‘review’ of the deal after Trump called it “terrible”? It appears the PM has in reality kicked it into the long grass until there is a new president That leaves the vitally important base in legal limbo for years bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
7
362
POTUS is completely correct. The Chagos Islands deal is nothing more than an act of geopolitical illiteracy. It should be thrown in the bin.
‘It is a terrible deal.’ President Donald Trump blasts the Chagos Islands deal, in his first meeting with Prime Minister Andy Burnham.
1
3
19
986
A ridiculous decision. Britain’s foreign policy does not bode well. For a start: the Chagos Islands are nowhere near Mauritius.
🚨 NEW: Andy Burnham has reassured Mauritius that the UK is still committed to the Chagos Islands deal It comes after Mauritius threatened to sue the Government over the delay
8
396
Edward Howell retweeted
It takes a shocking amount of time for an author to make a single penny in royalties on a book - I think people would be surprised... So please, if you know anyone who likes opera, do buy them this! Thank you. 🙏 amazon.co.uk/Someone-Elses-M…
2
21
51
1,729
This statement is one of the most idiotic statements uttered by a British Prime Minister. It will come back to haunt Burnham. The past week has been an utter catastrophe for British foreign policy--the worst is yet to come.
🚨 BREAKING: Andy Burnham suggests he won't cut benefits to pay for defence spending "National security cannot come at the expense of social security" #PMQs
1
5
361
For how long will I have to wait, staring at my computer, @British_Airways?
16
5
55
5,073
An excellent riposte.
MAHIYA NAMAN KAYO | Secretary of National Defense Gilberto C. Teodoro, Jr. responded to a note from the Chinese side during the Seoul Defense Dialogue (SDD) 2026 in Seoul, Republic of Korea. #DNDPHL #DiKaPasisiil #SDD2026
1
289
Miliband is not standing up for what is right. A truly disastrous start for British foreign policy under Burnham—and things look only to get worse.
The UK will stand up for what is right.
1
1
5
556
What an utterly illogical argument.
But look, all those of you who are so incensed that St Paul's Cathedral should be used for reasons other than worship: by all means argue that it should forgo the huge tourist revenue it receives every year. What after all is Christian about that?
1
226
And she is qualified to comment on defence spending because…?
Union chief Jo Grady warns Labour against focusing on defence spending, telling @skynews dealing with climate change is more important: 'Real security is not going to be delivered by investing more money in Nato...'
3
274
I guess the next step is for @StPaulsLondon to be a second venue for HEAVEN. Name a more iconic duo. How the @churchofengland has fallen.
Fabric. St Paul’s Cathedral. Name a more iconic duo. Bringing together these two institutions will create a one-of-a-kind experience, pairing world-class music with one of our most special landmarks. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy8z…
2
10
1,080
Edward Howell retweeted
The proofs are in! Three months to go until my upcoming book, A NEW AXIS OF UPHEAVAL: North Korea, Russia, China, Iran is released with @HurstPublishers. For pre-release copies, click here: hurstpublishers.com/book/a-n…. To pre-order a copy from @Waterstones, click here: waterstones.com/book/a-new-a…
8
18
2,780
An utterly ridiculous and, quite simply, asinine statement from a former head of an Oxford college.
Question: how much media coverage will be consecrated to examining “ theologian and philosopher” James Orr’s position at Cambridge compared to Jason Arday’s? A pile-on of similar scale?
13
9
122
10,101
Very well said @MaxE2review. Indeed, this is true.
Jason Arday’s death is very sad. However by far the main issue here, in fact all the main issues, are - 100% predictably - being left largely unaddressed by this inquiry. Namely, the virtually all-dominant nature of intellectually bankrupt, activist-style, cultish progressive dogma within the most elite universities in the world. Everything else - the DEI hiring, the ridiculous promotion of people who are patently wildly unqualified to the most eminent positions imaginable, the lack of scrutiny or critical analysis of those people’s output - and so on, flows directly from that ideological capture. These institutions are absolutely incapable of understanding this fact, because they are largely made up of people who build entire careers by peddling the very dogma I’m describing. So instead they react as they always have and always will, by creating a victim narrative in which the ‘real problem’ is them and their staff being oppressed by everyone else. And in which they bow to the perma-outraged woke-activist sections of their own staff and student body. I am a former Cambridge student, and am speaking to *many* academics who are sick of what’s going on. Follow on here for updates.
1
4
444