husband, father of Alijah & Tatum, artist management, music publisher 🎶 & 🏀 manager ☘️ Celtics
- Tweets 12,415
- Following 163
- Followers 7,356
- Likes 3,984
Big Boi 1992
Big Boy 1994
So there you go maybe fact check your nonsense.
Also, Big Boi is a rapper and Big Boy was a security guard turned radio personality. Those 2 can coexist in this world without confusion.
55
Dr. Dre and Doctor Dré coexisting doesn’t mean every pair of artist names has to coexist. Each dispute turns on its own facts. And Outkast being in the Rock Hall doesn’t make their name fair game. People can still buy their music and merch or assume a newer artist is connected to them, even if the duo hasn’t released an album in years. The legal question is whether the names are likely to confuse consumers about a connection, not whether Ovrkast took a measurable amount from their pockets.
You can disagree that these names cause confusion. But calling it “extortion” assumes you know the lawyers’ motives, and saying Ovrkast refused to sign an agreement doesn’t establish what happened between them. Those facts are disputed. Let the evidence answer them.
It's dumb logic. Dr. Dre and Doctor Dre both used their names commercially for over 40 years. And people got them mixed up all the time where you have to say "Doctor Dre from Yo! MTV Raps". Not ONCE you ever heard either one saying the other is taking $$$ out of the other man's pockets because of name confusion.
What makes this lawsuit bullshit is this point: Outkast are officially Rock & Roll Hall of Fame alums. They and their name is CEMENTED in American music history. Nothing is taking away from that.
Outkast last time they TOGETHER as Outkast performed on stage was a whole DECADE AGO. Their last album was TWENTY YEARS AGO. The last song they did together as Outkast was when they were featured on UGK's International Players joint. That was also 19 YEARS AGO. I say all this because they as a group has not been active. What CONFUSION is there to be made? What presumption that Ovrkast is taking monetary profits from an inactive rap group? It's a bullshit rationalization.
The truth is Ovrkast clientele is rising and got bigger within the music industry. The legal representation of Outkast seen this and using it to extort Ovrkast. Pay them for use of the name or change it. Ovrkast tried to comply, but he wasn't with them trying to extort him and refused to sign the agreement. And that's why he's getting sued. It's not from the BS that's claim because Outkast aren't even together.
1
46
You don’t get it
You have the right to choose a name. That doesn’t mean you have an unlimited right to use it commercially if it’s likely to confuse people about who’s behind the music. Outkast doesn’t have to prove Ovrkast took a specific dollar out of their pockets for the trademark claim to have merit.
There is no confusion over Big Boi a rapper and Big Boy ex security guard - radio host!
Ovrkast
Outkast
There is visual confusion and and both rappers.
That question depends on the names and how each is used. You can argue Outkast won’t prove its case, but “people can spell their names however they want” isn’t the legal test.
If Ovrkast literally taking money out of Outkast's pockets by any means off of name similarity and manipulation of assumption of others investing into actual Outkast, then the lawsuit has merit.
But people has a RIGHT to name themselves however TF they want. They can spell it however TF they want too.
If that's the case, Big Boi need to change HIS NAME because radio personality, BIG BOY, had the name 1st. Both of them sharing it for more than 30 years.
3
4
561
I’m not saying OutKast’s entire brand was in danger. I’m saying they have a legitimate reason to object if they believe another artist’s name and presentation could cause confusion. You can think filing a lawsuit is wack—that’s a fair opinion. But “their brand is big enough to survive it” doesn’t answer whether confusion is happening.
This argument would require me to concede it was ever in danger … I hate when yall try to talk to us like we’re stupid just bc we don’t agree 😂 we know what a brand is and why one would protect it we’re saying this is not that and what they’re doing is wack
5
22
1,206
The Outcasts and OutKast aren’t the same comparison. One is The Outcasts; the other is OutKast—different spelling, a plural versus a singular name, and different musical genres. Could The Outcasts make a claim? Maybe, but that doesn’t automatically mean they’d win or that OutKast owes them money. And it doesn’t settle whether Ovrkast is too close to OutKast.
2
2
378
It’s funny seeing the younger crowd on Twitter—or X, whatever we’re calling it now. Takes me right back to 2007–2010, when everybody was at each other’s throats on here.
A lot of people are getting caught up in their feelings and egos over this OutKast situation without trying to understand the legal side. You can disagree with the lawsuit, but trademark law exists for a reason.
106
Sonic’s originally
Former Blazers Broadcaster Kevin Calabro to Join Timberwolves blazersedge.com/nba-news-rum…
148
The music industry is hard to navigate, and as a manager, your job is to look out for your artist’s best interests. You’ll take a lot of the Ls while the artist gets credit for the Ws. That comes with the role.
In a situation like this, the best move is to stop talking publicly and let legal counsel handle it. Every post, repost, and interview adds fuel to the fire and gives people more to dig through. Good intentions won’t protect your artist from the consequences of what you say.
If there really was an agreement to change the stylization of the name and it wasn’t followed, own that and fix it. I get that an artist can become attached to a name. But the similarity between Outkast and Ovrkast is obvious enough that it should have raised concerns, especially when the artist himself has talked about people confusing the two.
Sometimes you take the L, make it right, and move forward. Dragging it out could cost far more than changing the name. And who knows? Handling it with some humility might even leave the door open for Big Boi and André to show him love down the road.
4
10
641
I keep seeing people frame this as “millionaires going after a little up-and-coming artist.” That doesn’t answer the actual issue.
OutKast spent decades building a name that people recognize worldwide. Being successful doesn’t mean they’re supposed to let someone else use a name that could confuse people about whose music they’re seeing. Protecting that name is part of protecting the work and legacy they built.
You can root for an independent artist and still understand why OutKast would defend its brand. Acting like they’re wrong simply because they have more money is a weak argument. They weren’t always millionaires. They worked for what they have, and they’re allowed to protect it.
8
14
116
1,916
All I keep hearing is how “unfair” this is and how OutKast is supposedly trying to take this dude’s money. Put yourself in their shoes for a second. If you spent decades building a global brand, and another artist styled his name in a way that looks strikingly similar to yours, wouldn’t you want to protect it?
People keep arguing that the names sound different. We see an artist’s name on a screen, a cover, or a flyer before we ever hear the music. That visual similarity matters. The artist himself has acknowledged that people have confused the names, which is the whole point I’ve been making.
And if they had an agreement for him to change the spelling, then he didn’t follow through, what did people expect to happen? I’m not rooting for anyone to lose everything. I’m saying OutKast has a right to defend the name and brand they built. If somebody wants to use a similar look, work out a licensing deal. Otherwise, stop acting like protecting your own work is some kind of injustice.
15
24
147
4,050
Finally got around to listening to the AZ Chike album. It’s cool and catchy, and the sound is cohesive, but a lot of the songs blend together. I would’ve liked a few more switch-ups to keep it interesting.
157
Once again, I’m not cheering on a lawsuit. I’m pretty sure this will settle. From what’s been reported, they tried to work it out with him, agreed on a name change, and he didn’t follow through.
I came on here to explain why the names could cause trademark confusion. You can tell me you aren’t confused, but Ovrkast himself has talked about people confusing him with OutKast. That’s the point I’ve been making.
Instead of addressing that, some of you keep attacking me and making it about race. Yeah, I called you morons—because you keep coming at me without understanding the fundamentals of what I’m saying.
I don’t want Ovrkast to take an L. His manager and team should’ve seen the similarity as a red flag and helped him handle it before it got here. If they keep doubling down instead of owning the mistake, it could cost him.
buddy, this doesn't help your case.
Outkast has to prove that he stole sales from them. Why are you cheering on a hall of fame group trying to bankrupt a smaller artist.
You're white, are you also Jewish by chance? Already know you're a retarded dad.
1
1
15
811
Ovrkast’s manager told me to “STFU” 🤣😂 Meanwhile, he’s on social media making things worse for his artist. I told him his lack of knowledge is failing his artist. Take the L, learn from it, ask questions, and surround yourself with people who know what they’re doing.
7
5
163
7,299
