FREE to THRIVE retweeted
🔥This is a great win for health freedom and sovereignty. Here's some background on PA's attempt to implment Covid Era tyranny: sayerji.substack.com/p/9-thi…
PENNSYLVANIA's DEPT OF HEALTH BACKS DOWN UNDER PRESSURE. After members raised serious concerns about the Shapiro administration’s overreach, and after they received over 6,000 appeals from the public, the PA DOH has WITHDRAWN their proposed COVID-era regulatory changes.
3
6
23
1,389
Subscribe at freetothrive.com to participate in this month's "Fireside Live," the monthly online gathering of the Thrive Community. This Saturday at 11 am Pacific time. #thrive #redpill #online #community #conversation
130
FREE to THRIVE retweeted
Send the patient home. Wait until their lips turn blue. Bring them in, put them in a coma, put them on a ventilator, and watch nine out of ten of them die. That was the official protocol, set by the WHO, the UN, and the United States government. Meanwhile, the doctors who refused to follow it, the ones who kept the Hippocratic Oath and treated the patient in front of them with whatever actually worked, were getting twice the survival rate. And those are the doctors who lost their licenses. Every single one of them, shut down, for having the best outcomes in the world and refusing to stay quiet about it. What we're left with is a medical establishment that purged its best doctors to protect a protocol that was killing nine out of ten people who followed it. That isn't a mistake. That is the greatest medical fraud that has ever taken place.
254
4,755
9,979
103,087
FREE to THRIVE retweeted
⚠️ The easiest population to control is one that thinks it couldn’t be controlled. 64 years later... And we’re still ignorant of our own captivity.
8
77
182
2,606
FREE to THRIVE retweeted
SJ LIVE Sep 24: Healing, Economy & Culture Off The Grid W/The Dollar Vigilante Jeff Berwick nitter.net/i/broadcasts/1dKrPrpmY…
8
15
44
4,141
FREE to THRIVE retweeted
THIS IS HUGE ! Naomi Wolf nails it: The biggest shocker in the Pfizer docs isn’t the side effects we’ve been aware of, it’s that the vaccine is designed to target human reproduction, not the respiratory system, and they’re obsessed with it, 360 degrees of it, as revealed in a stunning revelation. She explains how the lipid nanoparticles are engineered to penetrate every membrane, including the placenta. This causes calcifications that stop babies from getting nutrients and oxygen. The outcome? Midwives say placentas are falling apart, leading to premature births, horrific maternal hemorrhaging, and a 40% spike in maternal mortality in the West. Pfizer knew the nanoparticles would invade the testes of baby boys in utero, degrading the Leydig cells that produce masculinity and fertility. Even if never vaccinated themselves, they may never develop normally. An andrology report confirmed the vaccine stops sperm motility in men. Most damningly, Pfizer warned male trial participants not to have intercourse with unvaccinated women or to use two forms of contraception, defining “exposure” through semen, skin contact, and breath. Out of 270 pregnancies in the trial, records on 234 were “lost.” But of the remaining 36, more than 80% ended in the loss of the baby. Pfizer knew it. Why was it the main focus of their research?
97
1,742
2,699
44,086
FREE to THRIVE retweeted
They cannot tax you 20% more without you resisting it, so they print the money instead and take it through inflation. You pay the same price either way except one method requires your permission (sort of) and the other one doesn’t at all. Ron Paul said it is not a coincidence that the 20th century was both the century of central banking and the century of total war.
30
287
1,337
35,595
One of the major themes in "Thrive: What on Earth Will it Take" revolves around the concept of the torus pattern. This powerful energetic displacement is responsible for manifesting the material world out of the unified field. Once you see it, you can't unsee it. freetothrive.com #thrive #torus #sacredgeometry #ancientwisdom #moderntechnology
1
2
206
"Thrive II: This is What it Takes" applies the theories presented in the original documentary to real-world scenarios that could practically manifest as a Thriving world for all. Check out both films today at freetothrive.com/movie #thrive #conspiracy #redpill #documentary
3
5
280
FREE to THRIVE retweeted
Ok, we now have the actual text of the Greenland deal (whitehouse.gov/briefings-sta…), so we can say how it compares to the existing 1951 arrangement and who, between Trump and Denmark, lied the most in their framing of it. Long story short - which may surprise some - the Danes lied the most: Trump is pretty much correct in saying that this new deal grants the US control of Greenland. Let's look into what changed compared to the 1951 deal. 1) This is now a permanent arrangement: whereas the existing 1951 deal only lasted as long as NATO existed, this one "does not have an end date and may only be amended by mutual consent." It even survives a hypothetical future independence of Greenland: in that event, Denmark and Greenland must ensure that the independent Greenlandic state "affirmatively assume[s] all of the rights and obligations of the Kingdom of Denmark specified in this Agreement." 2) In the 1951 agreement, the US could set up bases only where both governments agreed, and only on the basis of NATO planning. The new deal locks in three bases: the US can "modernize and expand its activities" at Pituffik, its only base in Greenland until now, and "shall be allowed to establish an additional Defense Area at Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig." Further bases beyond these 3 can be justified by the defense of "the American continent," a US interest rather than a NATO one. Also, quite subtle but this is interesting: Article IV(iii) says that "the United States may establish additional defense areas in Greenland" and that consultations are then held "to decide implementation details based on mutual agreement." What this means is that the principle of a new base is automatically granted and only the implementation details require agreement. Article VII also gives the US "the right to raise concerns regarding construction, or change of use" of any building near a US base, after which the parties decide together what to do. Which means that the US has a say over civilian planning around its bases. 3) On US military movement across Greenland, the wording change between the 1951 agreement and this new one is quite funny. The 1951 text said (Art. V(3)): the US "may enjoy... the right of free access to and movement between the defense areas through Greenland, including territorial waters, by land, air and sea," but only "in accordance with general rules mutually agreed upon and issued by the appropriate Danish authority in Greenland." The new one says: "the United States of America shall enjoy... the right of free access to and movement between the Defense Areas through Greenland, including the Territorial Waters, by land, air and sea." That's it: "May" becomes "shall," and the US military movement no longer has to follow rules "issued by the appropriate Danish authority in Greenland." The US also gets something new on top: "undersea access to and movement within the Territorial Waters," i.e. submarines. 4) Non-NATO exclusion: non-NATO states are barred from military installations or a persistent presence in Greenland unless all three parties approve, giving the US an effective permanent veto. The 1951 deal had no equivalent clause. 5) Investment screening: this is entirely new. "States or investors from a state that is not a member of NATO, a NATO partner, or an EU member state" (i.e. Russia, China, India, the Gulf States, etc.), "shall not be allowed to have (i) control, (ii) significant influence, or (iii) access to non-public information...within Particularly Sensitive Sectors or Activities in the territory of Greenland (including the Territorial Waters), unless agreed between the Parties." Again, it basically means that the US has a permanent veto over who can invest in strategic sectors in Greenland, as far as non-NATO or EU states are concerned. 6) Lastly, in stark contrast with the 1951 deal, the framing of the deal changes significantly: this new deal is largely framed around the US. The 1951 agreement existed only "for the benefit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization." The new one lists the defense of "the American continent" as an objective, celebrates "the irreplaceable role" of the United States military as well as "the United States' indispensable historical and ongoing contributions to the security and defense of Greenland," and names the establishment of Trump's "Golden Dome" missile defense system as a key goal. So, to sum up: - The US secured a permanent military foothold that even an independent Greenland would inherit whether it likes it or not - The US now has veto power over any non-NATO military presence in Greenland, and over who can invest in its strategic infrastructure and resources (beyond NATO and the EU) - Denmark signed away its say over the principle of new US bases, with only the right to discuss the "implementation details" - Danish authorities no longer set the rules for US military movement across the island - And all of it is now justified by the defense of "the American continent" I don't know in which universe this even remotely "recognizes the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Kingdom and the Greenlandic people's right to self-determination," as Danish PM Mette Frederiksen put it (stm.dk/en/press/press-releas…). Yes, the preamble of the text cynically "reaffirms" Danish sovereignty but, in my book, when you let a foreign country put bases on your soil, move its troops without following your rules and veto who else can come in, in perpetuity, after it spent two years threatening to take you by force, the word for that is anything but "recognized sovereignty" 🤷
Looks like what happened was: Trump: "We're going to buy Greenland!" Denmark: "Absolutely not, Greenland is not for sale! But you can have it for free" (I'm aware that Denmark is saying they kept "sovereignty" over it, but not sure what that word means when another country has permanent veto power over who can invest on your territory and occupies the place militarily)
716
3,905
14,174
1,948,562
Replying to @macroaggressio3
A heavy conversation we all need to have.
1
2
6
245
FREE to THRIVE retweeted
The more you know, the crazier it gets.
98
963
4,514
86,945
Considering the upheaval created by the hint of Russian collusion, this relationship should be a cause of great consternation to those concerned about placing America First. freetothrive.com #thrive #isreal #netanyahu #americafirst
1
2
216
Foster points out another classic mind trap in this episode of "7 Levels Deep." This one concerns the belief that some form of authority must exist, even in a stateless society. By this point, people recognize that authority is the problem! freetothrive.com #thrive #conspiracy #redpill #authority #government
1
271
FREE to THRIVE retweeted
BREAKING: Massive MAHA Coalition Representing 63 MILLION Followers Sends Open Letter to Trump and RFK Jr. Demanding REMOVAL of the mRNA Platform 168 prominent physicians, scientists, lawmakers, and public figures unite behind six demands for sweeping federal action: 1. BAN mRNA/gene-therapy-derived technologies for all vaccines 2. TERMINATE the PREP Act declaration for COVID injections 3. REPEAL the PREP Act 4. BAN pharmaceutical direct-to-consumer advertising 5. END federal healthcare incentives that promote medical coercion 6. END conflicts of interest at the CDC, FDA, NIH, and NIAID I’m proud to stand among the signatories putting our names behind these demands.
Large medical freedom coalition with a social media footprint of over 63 million followers tells Kennedy and Trump “Remove mRNA shots or pay a political price.” justthenews.com/government/w…
476
9,025
19,530
384,096
FREE to THRIVE retweeted
BREAKING: Our study revealing that spike protein drives PRION-LIKE protein misfolding has now been PEER-REVIEWED and PUBLISHED. BILLIONS of people were exposed to LAB-MADE spike protein containing PRION-LIKE DOMAINS capable of promoting dangerous protein clumping. This helps explain spike-associated CREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE, amyloid microclot formation, large WHITE FIBROUS CLOTS, and progressive multi-organ damage. Those responsible must be held to account. @Docjohnc @P_McCulloughMD
161
2,573
5,275
391,411
Scientist and author @GreggBraden is featured prominently in "Thrive II: This is What it Takes," helping to describe the practical applications of the physics elucidated in the original documentary. Check out both films free of charge today at freetothrive.com/movie #thrive #freedom #ancientwisdom #moderntechnology
1
3
221