Democrats can be described in 7 words: Pride, Greed, Lust, Anger, Gluttony, Envy, and Sloth
Philadelphia, PA
- Tweets 73,406
- Following 4,269
- Followers 2,991
- Likes 252,522
Tony Unplugged retweeted
Ilhan Omar update:
It's looking like deportation would be the favorable option for Ilhan Nur Said Elmi...
92
739
3,669
60,630
Tony Unplugged retweeted
Muslim immigrant from the Middle East says the France protests are apart of the Islamic plan to conquer Europe and America
“This is gonna be a tough one, but I have to say it. You don't want to listen to the conservatives because ‘they're racist,’ so listen to a migrant, a Muslim man, a minority who moved here in 1999 from Middle East. They're invading your country.
Look at what's going on in Europe right now. Look at what's been going on in the United States. This is an invasion.
Don't say it's never gonna happen, it's Europe, it will never happen. But pay attention, this has been happening to different nations for 2,000 years. Look at Iraq, look at Iran. They used to look like Europe, and now if women aren't wearing a hijab, they get whipped, they get stoned, they're oppressed. Don't say it won't happen. It will”
He explains the radical Islamists are out to conquer the West, and it’s happening right now
This is what we need, more immigrants from the Middle East speaking up about radical Muslims plan to take over and conquer the West
267
5,245
10,684
132,036
Tony Unplugged retweeted
The newest painting in the Louvre. “The Girl with the Suicidal Empathy.” Oil on canvas. Go see it while the Louvre is still standing.
910
11,242
71,112
728,245
Tony Unplugged retweeted
"Are you optimistic about the situation in Europe?" @FBBlackler
Me:
469
3,368
16,135
532,178
Tony Unplugged retweeted
الست الفرنسية المزهولة دي .. عضوة في حزب اليسار الفرنسي وناشطة من اكبر دعاة فتح الهجرة لشعوب شمال افريقيا وبتدافع عنهم كل مايعملوا مصيبة وكارثة وتتهم الأخرين اللي عايزين يوقفوا طوفان الهمج دول بالعنصرية ...
هي عندها محل شيك صغير في مكان راقي وقفت في محلها تحاول تنقذه من النهب والسرقة وعشان هي ناشطة مشهورة
بتقولهم انا فلانة الناشطة بتاعة اللجوء انا معاكوا انا دافعت عنكم وعن دخولكم و بقائكم في فرنسا زقوها وقعوها وداسوا عليها بأقدامهم كويس انها لسه حية
ونهبوا المحل كله الست بقت علي الحديدة خسرت كل كفاح وشغل عمرها في لحظة ..
واقفة مذهولة مش مصدقة ان اللصوص الغوغاء المجرمين البرابرة دول هما اللي طول عمرها بتدافع عنهم وعن انهم يغزوا بلدها ويخربوه
عشان شهرتها في الدفاع عن لاجئين شمال افريقيا كل الميديا الفرنسية امبارح جايبة قصتها وصورتها قدام محلها المنهوب شقي عمرها كله وهي مش مصدقة مدي غبائها اللي وصل فرنسا للخراب والدمار ده كله 😢
10,081
43,791
191,860
6,480,889
Tony Unplugged retweeted
I uploaded all of Marc Elias’s podcasts from the past six months that focus on the Supreme Court to NotebookLM. This is what it had to say...
How Progressive Elites are Plotting to Dismantle the American Republic
A coordinated, apocalyptic narrative is currently being pushed by prominent progressive lawmakers, legal scholars, and activists, revealing a terrifying blueprint to completely dismantle the foundational institutions of the United States. Claiming that the nation is on the "precipice of absolute tyranny," these left-wing figures are actively utilizing extreme fear-mongering to justify an unprecedented structural power grab. Under the guise of "saving democracy," this coalition is telegraphing a highly alarming agenda: delegitimizing the Supreme Court, ruthlessly weaponizing the executive branch, and eradicating state-level election integrity measures to secure permanent progressive rule.
The Calculated Destruction of the Supreme Court
The most immediate target of this radical movement is the United States Supreme Court, an institution the left now openly despises for adhering to the Constitution rather than bending to progressive political demands. Rather than accepting judicial outcomes they disagree with, these activists are waging a relentless smear campaign to obliterate public faith in the judiciary. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse aggressively dismisses the Supreme Court as a "captured court" controlled entirely by "right-wing billionaire barons". Echoing this dangerous contempt, Senator Richard Blumenthal has labeled the conservative majority as nothing more than a bunch of "politicians in robes," framing their lawful rulings as a national disgrace. Representative Jamie Raskin goes so far as to describe the highest court in the land as illegitimately "gerrymandered and cracked and packed".
This relentless demonization is not merely rhetorical; it is the deliberate groundwork for a radical institutional takeover. Harvard Law Professor Nicholas Bowie openly suggests that if the public disagrees with the Supreme Court, Congress could simply strip the Court of its jurisdiction or artificially "change the number of justices" to secure preferred liberal outcomes. Progressive commentators like Dahlia Lithwick openly mock the concept of "American exceptionalism" and express disbelief that the United States continues to allow lifetime tenure for its highest jurists, unfavorably comparing America to other nations. To immediately enforce this ideological purge, Senator Whitehouse has explicitly proposed implementing retroactive 18-year term limits to forcibly and immediately remove sitting conservative justices from the bench.
The Hypocritical Weaponization of the Justice System
The glaring hypocrisy underlying this progressive agenda is most apparent in their explicit plans to weaponize the Department of Justice against their political opponents. Throughout their rhetoric, progressive figures hysterically accuse Republicans of plotting to use the federal government for retribution. Yet, progressive legal operative Marc Elias openly demands that a future Democratic president abandon institutional norms and use the DOJ as a proactive partisan weapon. Elias explicitly states that Democrats must abandon any nostalgic desire to return to the "moderate governance" of the Barack Obama or Joe Biden eras. Instead, he shockingly urges the left to learn directly from Donald Trump and "be willing to use all of the tools that he was willing to use". Elias complains bitterly that Merrick Garland's DOJ only brought a pathetic five voting cases, demanding that a new Democratic administration use the Department of Justice "proactively" to enforce progressive electoral mandates. This proves that the left's professed concern for "democratic norms" is a calculated fraud designed to disarm their opponents while they load their own institutional weapons.
The Federal Erasure of State Election Integrity
This authoritarian ambition extends directly into the complete federalization of the American electoral system. Progressive leaders are actively plotting to strip individual states of their constitutional authority to manage free and fair elections. Elias has shockingly suggested that Congress could bypass state legislatures entirely to enact a nationwide electoral map, enforce "proportional representation," or mandate a sweeping "nationwide pre-clearance requirement". Election law professor Nicholas Stephanopoulos similarly praises proportional representation as a "great appeal" because it practically guarantees outcomes for specific political and ethnic groups, eliminating the need for competitive litigation.
Meanwhile, common-sense election security measures are hysterically maligned to justify this massive federal intervention. Representative Dan Goldman fiercely attacks the SAVE Act, a basic bill simply requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote, as a malicious "voter suppression bill" and an illegal "poll tax". Goldman incredibly claims that ensuring non-citizens do not cast ballots is a "non-problem" and a mere scam designed to disproportionately impact poor and minority Democratic voters. Similarly, the progressive legal machine views standard, uniform election deadlines... such as requiring mail-in ballots to actually arrive by Election Day... as a calculated plot to disenfranchise voters, actively fighting in court to force states to count ballots arriving days after the polls have closed. Any effort to secure the ballot box or finalize a timely vote count is immediately smeared by these figures as an authoritarian effort to "stop the count" and steal an election.
The Deliberate Erosion of Constitutional Checks and Balances
Even the fundamental separation of powers established by the Founding Fathers is under attack. Representative Raskin bizarrely argues that the concept of three "co-equal" branches of government is a myth, famously insisting that "co-equal is not even a word". By asserting that Congress possesses ultimate, unrivaled legislative supremacy over the executive and judicial branches, the progressive left aims to bulldoze any constitutional checks on their legislative authority.
Driven by apocalyptic delusions of a "totalitarian seizure of power" by the right, this coordinated progressive movement is not trying to save American democracy. By their own explicit admission, they are broadcasting their intention to shatter the independence of the Supreme Court, hijack the Department of Justice, and rewrite the rules of every election to ensure a permanent, unchallengeable progressive grip on the nation."
Nikolas Bowie is the most plausible single candidate for the documentary source of the Shadow Papers. If he is not the direct source, the source is almost certainly inside his network.
The Times published seven memos from the February 2016 Clean Power Plan stay deliberation. Six justices. Roberts twice. Breyer, Kagan, Alito, Kennedy, Sotomayor once each. Six of the seven look identical in format. Chambers letterhead. Initials or signature at the bottom.
The seventh does not. The Sotomayor memo carries no chambers letterhead, no signature, no initials, and a date of February 16, three days after Scalia died, when every other memo in the packet runs February 5 through February 9. Either the date is a typo for February 6 and the memo was printed later on plain paper from a chambers working file, or it is a non-circulated draft Sotomayor wrote after Scalia died that never went to conference. Both readings point at one chamber. Whoever handed this memo to the Times had access to something that did not travel through the normal distribution.
Sotomayor's four OT 2015 clerks were Easha Anand, Nikolas Bowie, Bridget Fahey, and Matt Shahabian. Three of them have gone quietly into appellate practice and doctrinal scholarship. Anand runs the Supreme Court litigation clinic at Stanford. Fahey teaches federalism at Chicago. Shahabian is in private practice. None has built a public career against the Court.
Bowie has. For five years he has been building the most developed academic case in the country for dismantling Supreme Court power, with the shadow docket as a named reform target. His 2021 testimony to the Biden Commission called the Court "antidemocratic." His 2021 Harvard Law Review Foreword, titled Antidemocracy, runs the length of a short book in service of the same thesis. In October 2024 he co-authored a New York Times op-ed with Daphna Renan titled "The Supreme Court Has Grown Too Powerful. Congress Must Intervene." His Liveright book with Renan, Supremacy: How Rule by the Court Replaced Government by the People, lands September 15, 2026. Seven weeks before the midterms. He sits on the board of People's Parity Project.
And he has not kept the playbook theoretical. In 2023, on Elie Mystal's Contempt of Court, Bowie walked through the specific mechanisms Congress could deploy to disempower the Court… jurisdiction stripping, funding control, supermajority requirements on Court orders, the entire menu. He told Mystal the obstacle is not legal but cultural. "It's just a question of what do you think you could politically do to reassert democracy."
Then there is the Kantor relationship.
On February 2, 2026, ten weeks before the leak, Jodi Kantor published a front-page Times piece on Chief Justice Roberts's new nondisclosure agreements. Bowie was the closing quote.
"If the public were aware of how much of the deliberations affecting millions of people are made by 27-year-olds after happy hour, they'd be shocked."
Ten weeks later, Kantor and Adam Liptak showed the public exactly how those deliberations happen.
Days before the drop, Bowie appeared on a Harvard Law School panel titled Why I Changed My Mind, seated between Samantha Power and Yochai Benkler, moderated by Jonathan Zittrain. On that stage, in front of a live audience, he anchored himself to the exact term the leaked memos are from.
"I clerked on the Supreme Court in 2016 and I was there when Justice Scalia died."
Then he told the audience the Court cannot be reformed through normal means.
"I'm actually probably never going to see a liberal Supreme Court in my lifetime, absent any kind of really a change from without."
A change from without.
Put the pieces together. A four-year Kantor-Liptak source operation running successive inside-the-Court exposures. Roberts's late-2024 NDAs covering only current personnel, leaving the 2015-era clerk cohort beyond their reach. The Dobbs investigation precedent proving the Marshal's office cannot identify leakers. Bowie's named role as Kantor's closing quote in the precursor piece. The forensic tell in the packet pointing at Sotomayor's chambers specifically. His own words days before the drop placing him in that chamber during that term.
The Shadow Papers advance the Bowie-Renan-Vladeck-People's Parity Project agenda with a precision that demands explanation.
In my reading, the pattern is most consistent with Bowie's involvement.
68
887
1,429
75,978
Tony Unplugged retweeted
Here’s a story of a lying lady…
And that’s how they all became the Somalia Bunch!
84
1,385
3,212
80,339
Tony Unplugged retweeted
this is who I am and why I post real face real name about visa fraud.
I am not racist
I am not hateful
I am not hiding
161
1,068
4,102
139,278
Tony Unplugged retweeted
Muslim leader in Pennsylvania says we cannot ban Sharia Law in America
“Sharia means the way of God. If we're going to ban it because we're a secular country, we should also ban Catholic schools. We should also close down churches. We should also ban synagogues and Jewish community centers”
There is a HUGE difference in what Islam is compared to other religions. Islam is Government, it’s extremely oppressive to women, it’s a cruel strict society where child sex abuse is common and acceptable
Banning Sharia Law should be a top priority in America
This man is a Muslim leader at the Islamic Society of Allentown in Pennsylvania
3,823
3,709
6,491
179,112
