Yesterday, Winston Peters was asked about remigration by a young patriot at his public meeting in Botany, Auckland. He stated he is against remigration because it is contrary to democracy and the rule of law.
If enough people vote for remigration, then it would be democratic. This is precisely the danger of replacement migration, as more foreigners gain voting rights it becomes harder to legislate in the national interest via liberal democracy. We never voted to be replaced, it must be reversed.
The rule of law concerns the exercise of government power according to law rather than arbitrary decisions. If legislation were enacted, for example the “Remigration Act 2030”, this would be completely within the rule of law because it would be government legislation. The executive could then initiate remigration according to the law.
It is great to see remigration entering the public discourse. This is a recent development thanks to the efforts of our organisation and of other nationalists across the West. This topic will only become more commonplace in the coming years, as New Zealanders wake up to the existential threat of replacement migration.