Reformed Apologist - Presbyterian Seeking God's Glory and Kingdom

Geneva
When your main objection to Calvinism is that salvation (according to Calvinism and Scripture) is about grace not fairness, you post this kind of statement, complaining that the lost did not get a fair chance at being saved:
No. Calvinism’s implications offend Christians because it paints God as the cause of unbelief and unbelievers as victims. T - God decreed all can’t believe from birth, U - unless He chose them before creation, L - paid for them, I - and irresistibly caused them to believe P - for their lifetime.
11
3
43
1,696
🤣
Calvinists assume (wrongly) that those of us who reject their dogma haven’t read their theologians or confessions. Many of us have. I have. Some of us like @Soteriology101 used to BE Calvinists. We just remain MORE convinced by scripture that Calvinism is false.
6
54
6,532
Is there moral responsibility in heaven? Is there authentic relationship in heaven? Is there real freedom in heaven? Of course, the answer is “yes.” Which implies that God’s will not being obeyed here on earth is not a necessary byproduct or any of those things.
God’s will is not always done here on earth as it is in heaven.
3
1
24
1,274
Going live around 2:30 pm Eastern US time to respond to the lecture by Peter van Kleek, Sr. from the recent 1 John 5:7 conference. youtube.com/watch?v=AsXKgkf1…
1
3
377
When your central “argument” against Calvinism is “it teaches that God decrees evils to occur,” what Calvinists mean by “decree” seems like it should matter. The reason it doesn’t to @DineshDSouza is the same reason I put “argument” in quotation marks: it’s an emotional appeal.
No, I can’t, because in a few short weeks I’ve heard about 37 Calvinist definitions including: Decree means decree. Decree sort of means decree. Decree is decree but without the implication of a command. Decree means “decree to permit.” Decree means permit.
22
2
61
7,476
Going live (D.V.) in about 15 minutes to discuss the recent 1 John 5:7 Conference, with a special emphasis on the presentation by Dr. Peter Van Kleek, Jr. youtube.com/watch?v=Fz35GNpt…
1
2
281
Impressive credentials for someone who can’t get an ad hominem right. I wonder why he thinks his BA in English or his work at policy think tanks qualifies him. His political connections are great, but his arguments are not.
I’ve resisted saying this, but this guy continues his pompous harangues. I have an Ivy League degree and have taught at Harvard and been a research scholar at AEI and the Hoover Institution at Stanford. “Dr.” White went to Grand Canyon College and has an online Ph.D.
6
1
60
1,444
When you say dumb things (see the mathematically absurd statement from DD) your critics are going to think it’s because you’re dumb, even if you aren’t. Better to learn something about the topic before speaking about it.
Every Calvinist seems to think he’s the smartest guy in the room. My reaction: Yeah maybe, but only in a room full of Calvinists!
27
917
There is an important, if sometimes blurry, line between Non-Calvinism and Anti-Calvinism. The line may be blurry, but I’m pretty sure on which side of it D’Souza has landed.
A Christian from Nigeria—where Christians face terrible persecution—picks up his Bible, puts on his latex gloves, and administers a much-needed theological suppository to Dr. James White. Now let’s see if the effect is medicinal or not.
2
2
49
2,008