Vi må sige fra overfor det anti-kristelige had, som udstrømmer fra Liberal Alliance. Et parti, der erklærer kristne som sine fjender, er Danmarks fjende.

Fremmede venstreorienterede aktivister og LA i fælles front med kristne danskere.

Islam is an existential threat to the west. Don’t give your children’s inheritance away because you are frightened of being accused of a made up term “Islamophobia.” This is our home. We have nowhere else to go. Protect it.

If there’s no shoot-to-kill order, it’s just posturing.

Establishments which have imported this now want your attention on - and your children’s conscription in - Ukraine. Whatever will be left of Europeans, if they get their way, will be at the mercy of those guys below. Ie the replacement. Brought to you by The Open Society and its retard demagogues. Whose ‘pro-Western’ stance was never about our civilization, but a narcissistic defense guarding their intellectually impotent, ridiculously longhoused Human Rights Civic Nationalism identities.

Hvorfor går muslimske migranter amok i Vesten? Der er (mindst) tre grunde til, at vi har massive problemer med muslimsk indvandring - som Frankrig i den grad mærker for tiden. 1. Vores vestlige statsmagter er simpelthen ikke udrustet til at kunne sætte sig i respekt overfor de muslimske migranter. Den vestlige (og i særdeleshed den skandinaviske) stat bygger på blød, feminin samtalemagt - noget som muslimer i gennemsnit er langt mindre modtagelige overfor end lille Oliver, Claude og Pierre. “Fy skamme, sæt dig uden for døren” og udsigten til dykkerferie med andre "udsatte" unge er simpelthen virkningsløst over for det segment. Den slags virker kun som ynkelig svaghed og en invitation til yderligere dominans på unge drenge og mænd, der er vokset op med helt andre og kontante boller på suppen. Hvis politi og myndigheder brugte rå magt over for gruppen, ville det være langt mere effektivt - men den slags myndighedsudøvelse er der (forståligt nok) ikke mange i Vesten der ønsker. Skød og tæskede det franske politi et par håndfulde røvere og ildspåsættere, ville showet stoppe i morgen. 2. Muslimer klarer sig dårlige i vestlige samfund, end den indfødte befolkning, og det skyldes fortrinsvis, at gruppen i gennemsnit har dårligere kognetive evner. Derfor ender de som underklasse i vores lande, hvilket fordrer misundelse og konflikt. 3. Den hjælp og omsorg som migranterne får gennem overførsler, gør paradoksalt nok, at de kommer til at hade de glade givere - for hjælp og omsorg til voksne mennesker viser, at man er svag og underlegen. Stærke mennesker kan klare sig selv. Det skaber lyst til oprør mod værterne og det samfund, der får migranterne til at føle sig mindre værd. Løsningen på det hele er selvfølgelig indlysende: at arabere og afrikanere bor i Mellemøsten og Afrika at europæere bor i Europa.

Samfundets egentlige problem stammer fra ekstrem feminisme - fx den muslimske migration og dens voldsomme negative konsekvenser. Men alligevel bruger medieklassen alt krudtet på få ligegyldige mande-tosserier.

Has even a single politician who actively pushed for mass immigration (or even one who stood by and did nothing) apologized and publicly stated that they were wrong and made a mistake?

Tens of thousands of rioters are approaching the Louvre. They have vowed to burn it down along with EVERYTHING in it. You are an advisor to the French govt. Security informs you that the ONLY way to stop the rioters is to gun them all down. There would be a minimum of 1000 deaths. Do you advise security to shoot?

Are you going to shoot the boats? No. Then the problem will only get worse.

Whether you like it or not, the reason why Europe is falling is because it lost its Christian faith.

I do not know how things are in other countries. But in Denmark, when I follow the coverage of the unrest in France on our two public-service television broadcasters, the explanation I keep hearing is this: France has spent years cutting back on upper secondary education. Classes are overcrowded. Add teacher shortages and excessive centralisation, and young people take to the streets. That is only half the truth. And when you peddle half the truth, you are, as we know, also peddling half a lie. Here is what can be pieced together from the French quality press and the official figures. France’s public spending per upper-secondary pupil is above the OECD average. That should complicate any account which treats a lack of money as the whole explanation. There is some truth in the criticism: some lycées have large classes, and the French education system is centralised and bureaucratic. One example worth mentioning is Parcoursup, the higher education admissions platform. I suspect it would be a strong contender in any international competition for bureaucratic opacity and unnecessary stress. But, as I have already said, this is only half the truth. The other half concerns what teachers and school leaders are being asked to endure. I admit that this is anecdotal. But recently, a math teacher from Metz described in a long and serious post on X how the teachers simply burn out at the most problematic high schools. We need to dig deeper into this constant attrition of skilled high school teachers. Why are schools being left to carry so much of the burden? French politicians are no different from politicians elsewhere in Europe. They want as many young people as possible to complete upper secondary education and go on to higher education. For the usual reasons: education is supposed to break the cycle of inherited disadvantage, while higher education is supposed to raise productivity. I find those arguments only partly convincing when these benefits are treated as automatic consequences of expanding access. In my view, France faces a problem we also know in Denmark: schools are being asked to compensate for failures of integration and basic socialisation that extend far beyond the classroom. The danger is that, instead of institutions civilising their pupils, disruptive pupils end up barbarising the institutions. No school can function properly if it is expected to tolerate young people who turn up unprepared, have no interest in learning and spend their time causing trouble and destroying the learning environment. It is hardly surprising that such conditions can wear teachers down. They cannot reasonably be expected to shoulder the entire responsibility for correcting mistakes that the French political elite has spent decades making. La France Insoumise and other radical organisations have encouraged the protests and blockades. Mélenchon has called for non-violence. However, this formal appeal for moderation appears symbolic when the LFI mayor of Saint-Denis simultaneously allows himself to be photographed among demonstrators and calls their actions justified. Le Point has meanwhile reported on mobilisation by Étudiants musulmans de France and its cooperation with RED Jeunes. The former is linked to the Muslim Brotherhood milieu in a French Interior Ministry report; the two organisations helped establish the anti-Islamophobia collective Génération EDR, whose links to the antifascist group La Jeune Garde are also described by Le Point. That is the kind of convergence I mean by Islamogauchism in practice. The flags also deserve attention. Palestinian, Moroccan and Algerian flags have appeared at some of the protests, including scenes of disorder. To me, this is another indication that, for some participants, the agenda extends beyond class sizes and school budgets. We do not yet know the full picture. But what concerns me is the apparent convergence, within parts of this movement, of several forms of radicalism: Antifa activism. Decolonial ideology. Islamogauchism. Islamist networks that have learnt from the left to speak fluent woke. That is why I do not think it entirely misplaced to speak of an “Islamogauchist intifada” when describing this radical current within the French protests. The wider protest wave has already spread to Belgium and Italy. The Danish public-service coverage I have seen gives me far too little of this side of the story. Two questions: Is it the same elsewhere in the Western world? And if so, why?

"Are you optimistic about the situation in Europe?" @FBBlackler Me:

Remigration eller vi mister alt. Nedkæmp den ekstreme venstrefløj eller vi mister alt.

If I were in charge of the French police, I would authorize the use of deadly force to protect France's historical monuments and national treasures. I am 100% serious.

Very good news. Rest In Piss, degenerates.

Verdens korteste politiske test: Hader du flyvende biler, er du venstreorienteret.

Forskellen mellem at være deskriptiv og normativ har længe været forskellen på højre og venstre. Højrefløjen forsøger at forholde sig til, hvordan virkeligheden rent faktisk ser ud og ud fra det komme med forslag til, hvad man kan gøre ved problemerne. Venstrefløjen har det omvendt rigtig skidt med virkeligheden i disse år. Venstrefløjen vil meget hellere forholde sig til verden, som den burde være ud fra deres egen ideologiske overbevisning. Venstrefløjen har det derfor bedst, når den kan forblive på det moraliserende niveau, hvor det f.eks. går ud på at påvise, at modparten er et dårligt menneske, er racist, fascist osv. Debatten går for venstrefløjen ud på at påvise, at modparten har en dårlig moral frem for at løse det diskuterede problem. @Julie_C_G_Grove beskriver således, hvordan Ali Aminali kiler sig ind som et skjold mellem Afrah al-Jabouri og Abud Mustafa og en bekymret dansk offentlighed. De tos optræden i Højskolen på TV 2 har nemlig afsløret en ekstremisme, som har skabt omfattende debat. Ali Aminalis handling vil imidlertid ikke resultere i andet, end at mange danskere ønsker køen til remigration udvidet med "moderate" typer som Ali Aminali, hvilket Julie Grove i øvrigt finder er en helt unødvendig udvikling. Dette er en indlysende rigtig beskrivelse fra Julie Groves side. Hvad enten man kan lide det eller ej, er det sådan. Denne beskrivelse får imidlertid @steffen_groth til at hæve den moralske pegefinger med et "Hold da op et tweet". Steffen Groth vil nemlig hellere forholde sig normativt til, hvad Julie Grove har skrevet. For er det egentlig ikke for dårligt, at hun skriver, som hun skriver? #dkpol

Living with violent crime is a choice. We know how to stop it, what too many of us lack is the will to get it done.