Replying to @RhysSullivan
@RhysSullivan I love Executor. It’s awesome. Couple things would be nice: 1) I would love to be able to have the agent combine data sources, and be able to schedule pulling from multiple data sources together, into visualizations in executor. Not sure if this is possible
3
66
I was gna build my own knowledge thing but there’s a world where if all my data pipes into my local executor, the knowledge layer could potentially also live there in artifact form
4
2) Tailscale support so when I launch a service with portless my agent-browser mcp mounted as a sidecar w/ supergateway can be used by the agent to access any URL over my tailnet
19
Ad astra per astra
1
2
126
Nathan retweeted
Once you've been smitten by the malleable computer, you're not going back. Everything else seems archaic. WHAT DO YOU MEAN I CAN'T JUST TELL MY COMPUTER TO BE DIFFERENT???
Just went and said to my agent in Omarchy to make the corners rounded. And it did. Then I said “install phonetic Bulgarian keyboard”. And it did. I’ve done the whole setup just literally talking to an agent. Because of the build in dictation I literally spoke to my computer to make it in the way I want it to look and work! This is pure magic! And it is just the beginning! Will post more to share the love for sure! Goal is - fully workable station for my daily job by the end of the week! @dhh good quacking job, sir!
54
31
1,062
122,068
Nathan retweeted
"Engineering, product, and design are all merging into a 'builder' role" Yeah... I'm not so sure. This feels like an oversimplification and podcast talking point. Reality is a lot more complex. Even with 1000 "Member of Technical Staff" titles, someone still has to wake up and care 100x more about Product or Design than anyone else. It is their Main Thing™ That's not to say MTS titles are universally bad, but I think they're an example of this 'builder' talking point that's become bastardized. AI and coding agents have made generating code easy and yet... you're in for a world of pain if non-engineers ship a bunch of slop and don't have great engineers to tame the complexity. The SF hivemind has a tendency to overfit what works at startups for every company. And to be fair, sometimes this is true! Startups can be a leading indicator for how the industry is changing and often cause disruption. However, it is going to be incredibly hard to disrupt the extremely human parts of corporate jobs. You really think there's going to be a PM who also does some engineering and design on the side at JPMorgan Chase? This is true for the simple parts of most jobs, like people wanting to have ownership over something and do good work, move up a career ladder, support their family, get paid well, make an honest living... And also the hard parts: internal politics, some critical business system that has a bus factor of 1 which has been running for 15 years and isn't documented anywhere because it's that guy's job security. The real world has a lot of this stuff. It's easy to pontificate about all roles collapsing but it's actually really nice to have a specific person or team who is an expert in one thing that you can work with. I don't expect that to change. Further, I think AI disruption to knowledge work will take decades to play out because it is more fundamental to the human condition (e.g. sociological/organizational) than pure intelligence.
143
105
1,377
148,012
Nathan retweeted
Guess ill move off of Vercel for (unpaid) personal projects at this point. I dont mind if people ask permission for this, and everyones free to make their own choices, but I am your funnel, not your product.
43
38
772
73,416
Confirmed that extends none doesn’t prevent everything
189
Nathan retweeted
I remember, years back in a previous job, I was given a UI design to implement. I noted that it didn't show how to handle error states. The product manager responded "We'd like this app to be implemented with… no errors".
66
173
9,377
284,946