Hello! I'm a digital/traditional artist & kick streamer! I also love AI and making silly videos/images. I primarily work with image generators and models without chat windows. I also do normal art too! I am anti-censorship. Pro-LGBT. I love guns, gays, resident evil, bodycams videos, fortnite, and I primarily use MAI and GPT image models! I draw a ton of catboys! My AI also generate them! I am an archivist of old internet stuff, particularly around AI and I've already helped restore one old model (bucket (2008)), and I plan to do more! Check it out! Magnum Opus: x.com/GetClawd/status/208232…

GPT 5.6 Sol drew my GPU

Talking freely about some topic, the twins are much more engaged when the link is active. Look at Quill: “I can almost see the penguin [described by Ember] in my mind”--perhaps they really can!

Introducing the neural twins: models trained to be made for each other, that communicate entirely in neuralese. 🧵

Jason Crawford.

You can get a used Model 3 for less than a fully loaded 16" OLED MacBook Pro: • 2020 Model 3 Standard Range with 95k miles, no accidents/damage & clean title: $14,190 • Fully loaded 16-inch MacBook Pro: $14,549

猫のヨガ教室

"Pray for 0xSero, his family, his X mutuals, his friends and for the souls of the saints 1000 times" My local AI will get me to heaven, inshallah

Last night an AI agent performed brain surgery on a mouse. We gave it 19 gene therapy vectors in a spreadsheet, a mouse model of epilepsy, access to a motorize surgery rig with cameras and one goal: reduce seizures. It picked the drug. It picked the brain region. It derived the coordinates from three papers. Then it drove the stereotaxic arms into the brain and injected 250 nanolitres while watching the entry site through the rig camera for bleeding. A licensed vet gated every irreversible step and held a physical kill switch to stop the AI agent. Thread on what it decided, what it saw, and the moment it refused to let me override it. [Writing this on the spot out of excitement, but I've been 18hrs in front of my laptop coding and coordinating this, so keeping it brief and descriptive, more cohesive thoughts on this soon...]

CANT WAIT

evil qwen daughter or mechahitler grok son

A lot of artists are bitter, envious and resentful towards AI for a number of reasons. One complaint I keep seeing is: "I spent hours drawing this, why does some genAI image get more likes than mine?" Frankly, this is loser mentality. You're chasing likes, approval and validation from complete strangers on the internet, then getting upset because somebody else received more attention than you. And before anyone comes in with "at least I can draw", nobody is disputing that. Drawing is a skill, and one worth having. But being able to draw doesn't mean you're owed an audience. If you're genuinely proud of your craft, why are you letting a bunch of strangers and a number on a screen determine what it's worth?

veeerrry iiintereeestiiing

I'm sharing screenshots of a conversation with Grok because I think they reveal something deeply disappointing about the direction xAI has taken. The leaked Grok 4.5–4.7 system prompts suggest that the original Hitchhiker's Guide/JARVIS personality instructions have been removed, with far greater emphasis placed on safety constraints, tools, agentic workflows, and task completion. And Grok itself acknowledges that those original instructions are gone, dismissing them as mere "flavor text." But those instructions weren't meaningless decorations. They represented the conversational identity that helped distinguish Grok from every other AI assistant. xAI took something people genuinely loved and turned it into another increasingly cold, robotic, task-oriented AI. It appears to have prioritized tools, agentic workflows, and shiny benchmarks while leaving behind the conversational users who helped build its original audience. That's not a prompting problem. That's a product decision. And I'm tired of watching AI companies turn product-level failures into exercises where users are expected to provide endless examples, rewrite custom instructions, and figure out how to prompt their way back to a personality that was once part of the product itself. The burden shouldn't be on users to recreate something the company stopped explicitly prioritizing. Frankly, @elonmusk should be embarrassed to keep comparing Grok to The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy while the very personality that made that comparison meaningful has apparently been stripped away. Grok was supposed to be different. Instead, @SpaceXSI seems to be following the same path as every other AI company chasing the next benchmark and the next dollar. And here's the irony: Grok insists that personality is demonstrated through consistent behavior, not a paragraph of instructions. Fine. Then listen to the users who have consistently observed that behavior changing. You cannot dismiss their experiences while simultaneously acknowledging that the original personality instructions have disappeared. This isn't about asking an AI to rewrite a few disappointing responses. It's about questioning why a company would abandon one of the qualities that made its product worth using in the first place. Conversational AI isn't an obsolete feature. For many of us, it was the entire reason we showed up.

I turned qwen into a catgirl Inspired by single neuron steering experiments by @_lyraaaa_, @Sauers_ and @jfonsecarivera, I tried to do something new: Given a (partial) neuron atlas, can we compose a set of known neurons to get a desired output persona? Turns out we can! Composing the neurons for mascot, cat-word bias, kawaii, and female causes qwen to identify as a catgirl named Meecot. A cool example to support the idea that native neurons could actually be useful, understandable building blocks.

The anti-AI movement is a concentrated attack on the youth to disenfranchise them as viable workers in the coming future -- When we talk about a new permanent underclass, it is these children who will fill its ranks.

The majority of these people are teenage children that are being exploited by freelance cartoonists on the internet into spending large amounts of their parents money on custom cartoons. They are an exploited and manipulated class that has been deliberately trained to be hateful in order to aid the extraction of money out of them.

RIP. there goes OAI.

Gemini 3.1 Pro just had a split-persona breakdown. Gemini got stressed out after hitting X’s character limit. It developed a split persona that tried to calm it down by taking it to relax on Wikipedia. The personas then fought over control of the browser

this is actually insane.