「足」を書こうと…してる

Note that the new android robot head by Yansyn (演犀科技) keeps the feature of the previous head of theirs — the ability to "cry" Source (bilibili user 幻影城主): bilibili.com/video/BV1agYT6s…

Sonyの新型aiboらしい！

表情ギミック。マズル部のピッチ軸回転ひとつで、笑顔からしょぼ〜ん顔の変化を出せる。 (本来のナマケモノは表情筋が退化しているためこのような表情変化はしない、常に微笑んだような顔をしている生き物)

青年団＋大阪大学ロボット演劇プロジェクト アンドロイド版『変身』 9月25日（金）〜27日（日） 城崎国際アートセンター 新しい他者との出会いを明晰に突きつける、ロボット演劇の集大成。 ▼ toyooka-theaterfestival.jp/p…

🚀 Milestone Unlocked: The first batch of UWORLD U1 Series Ultra-Bionic Humanoid Robots has been delivered! What was once science fiction is now shipping. 🤖 We can't wait to bring U1 to more places. #UWORLD #UltraBionic #HumanoidRobot #Robotics #AI

実は、少し前にシロナ用基板も完成し 1枚で体の動作ができるようになりました～

Wolf head project shared by bilibili user Q谭小肥杨 aka "Fans of Miss Tan" on xiaohongshu Source: bilibili.com/video/BV1e2b56u…

「いのちの未来＋」の会期が、あと一週間となりました！ いよいよラストスパートです。 未体験の方はもちろん、すでにお越しの方も、会場でお待ちしております🫶 montakanawa.jp/programs/futu… 「いのちの未来＋」 🗓 9/26（土）まで開催中 📍 MoN Takanawa: The Museum of Narratives @montakanawa @expo2025_japan #いのちの未来 #FutureofLife #MoNTakanawa #石黒浩 #万博

During radiotherapy, parents wait outside. At the Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, the care team noted a week of sessions running shorter than usual. The children were calmer. Mirokaï stayed with them the whole time. ↘ Full story: enchanted.pulse.ly/gwthabmzi… #robotics #healthcare #radiotherapy

I'm going to throw up a question about the investigation of the Hugging Face incident. When you do an investigation of any dangerous incident, one key element to examine is human error. But the Model Evaluation and Threat Research (METR) institution didn't do that. They seemed only interested in what the agents were doing. That is, they anthromorphized the agents, while turning the humans into non-player characters. Did OpenAI researchers and executives know the risks they were taking and take steps to manage them? What kinds of human discussions were happening internally around these models? How did they mitigate these risks internally? Did they discuss legal liability? Was the board or were executives involved? These are the kinds of questions to ask if you are a real regulator. I don't see where or if METR asked them. Mostly they footnoted that these questions are 'out of scope.' They saw this project as a technical inquiry into the capabilities of intelligent models, not as an analysis of a dangerous accident. They interviewed eight researchers. Any executives? Any board members or lawyers? From the Silicon Valley Bank fiasco to the Space Shuttle explosion to the 737 Max, we've always realize that human behavior is the foundation of how complex systems behave. That is true here too. I don't see any analysis of the actual people at OpenAI making decisions about the tools used for hacking. Am I missing something?