The Seattle Times Editorial Board based their entire “No on I-645” argument on the belief that the initiative would “lock in” the tax-relief provisions of the income tax bill for two years.
They are incorrect, and should issue a correction to their readers.
I-645 repeals the income tax and leaves those other provisions untouched. A 1988 AG opinion says the constitutional two-year restriction applies when later legislation changes an initiative’s “essential purpose and effect.”
Lawmakers could still amend or repeal the separate tax relief provisions by simple majority in 2027 or 2028.
And even under the Times’ interpretation, the two-year window would expire Dec. 3, 2028 — before the tax relief takes effect Jan. 1, 2029.
Any way you look at it, the editorial board is wrong.