At Red Rain we've been saying from the get-go that MLF's offense is not similar to McVay's or Shanahan's. Wasn't the point of hiring MLF (who's only run an offense for 3 seasons, 2 in NY and 1 in AZ so far with little success) having an offense that taps into the best concepts and constructs of McVay's and Shanahan's? Who influenced MLF to concoct a "different style" that he's never run before? This "different style" offense is about as small-ball and vanilla as offenses get. The play calling in the red zone has been ultra conservative to the point of being passive. It's like he's afraid to take shots into the end zone. There are no creative pet plays down there and MLF didn't know how to use Marv in the red zone where he is insanely talented. 4 plays in NY not one to Marv who was being covered by a CB2. What about MLF's plan for J. Love? He's like having him play in a phone booth. The point of NFL offenses isn't ball control, it's scoring. And the problem, as we have seen with ball control offenses is that one bad penalty and/or too many critical 3rd down conversions can derail the drive. Thus far, MLF looks like the anti-BA. He's the passive, make no key adjustments in-game ands week to week Jonathan Gannon type of offensive coaches. After going 0-5 in the red zone versus the Rams, look at his play calling versus Denver. Sideways screen passes, running for 0 yards on 2nd downs, running 6-yard passes on 3rd and goal from the 8. Then supposedly going for it on 4th and goal and yet with 2 timeouts available, watching his offense take an inexcusable delay of game penalty. His inexperience as a play caller is in full evidence. And now we are learning he's running a style of offense, as an inexperienced play caller, that he's never run before. No wonder why this offense repeatedly sputters and falls short.
“It’s a different style offense than I’ve ever run.”
Arizona Cardinals head coach Mike LaFleur discusses the Cardinals’ red-zone struggles and what needs to change to finish drives.