Tuchel out. Pep in.Unforgivable those changes. He was brought in exactly 2 manage these situations & failed miserably. We were warned the changes weren’t working b4 they equalised and he still didn’t rectify it even after they scored, allowing them to win it. All on him #ENGARG

Getting a bit fed up with the @FIFAWorldCup Officials getting in the way repeatedly on attacks round the edge of the D. Whenever a side tries to work a shooting chance to the midfielder on the edge of the box the ref is always in the way of the line of the pass/ shot /blocker.

England, it’s time. 🎙️ @stormzy

Today has created the “Chansiri paradox”Where it’s all his fault we went to admin but then we also owe his incompetence to not being deducted 15 points & where he somehow contrives to relinquish accidentally any money owed to him & give us also what look like good owners 🤷‍♂️ #swfc

AN INCREDIBLE MOMENT AT HILLSBOROUGH 🙌

New era #WAWAW 💙🤍💙

The EFL has sanctioned Sheffield Wednesday consistently since 2018. Over that period, the club has been hit with multiple transfer embargoes spanning nearly a decade. By October 2025, Wednesday were under six simultaneous embargoes — the most any club has ever faced. On top of that, the club has suffered repeated points deductions. A -12 deduction in 2020/21 severely damaged recruitment and momentum going into that season. Although it was later reduced to -6 on appeal, the damage had already been done — those points ultimately proved the difference between survival and relegation to League One. In 2025, the situation worsened further. The club received: •-12 points for entering administration, after the former owner failed to meet basic financial obligations such as paying wages and bills on time •A further -6 point deduction, again due to the owner’s failure to uphold his responsibilities This is not a case of a club gaining an unfair advantage — quite the opposite. The club has been placed at a significant competitive disadvantage for years due to sustained mismanagement. Sheffield Wednesday has endured one of the most damaging ownership periods a club of its size is likely to experience. The former owner’s approach has not only harmed the club financially but also created a toxic environment for staff and supporters alike. And yet, despite this, there is now an expectation that the same owner should be repaid — while the club continues to face further punishment. How can that be justified? The new ownership group should not be penalised for the failures of the previous regime. They should be given the opportunity to restore stability to a club that has lacked it for nearly 26 years. Imposing further sanctions — such as another -15 point deduction, spending caps, business plan restrictions, and transfer limitations — would only deepen the damage. It risks condemning the club to yet another relegation and prolonging the cycle of instability. At some point, there has to be recognition that continued punishment is no longer corrective — it is excessive. The club, its staff, and its supporters deserve the chance to move forward. #FairDealForWednesday @storchyowl

❤️

That’s the video right there. 👌 #SWFC • #WAWAW

24-carat Twitter perfection. Credit to the OP. #SWFC🦉

That was fun! 😃

🏆 #U19EURO WINNERS 🏆 Congratulations, #YoungLions!

Sad news about Jimmy Greaves Here’s THAT clip about an interaction between Dave Bassett and Ron Atkinson ;) #swfc

For a League One side… 🥰 #SWFC

Pure class. #SWFC 🦉⚽️

🎩Phil Foden. Top Class. 📹@ChampionsLeague.

Woah 😱

Coming to America; Good morning my neighbours

bbc.com/sport/live/cricket/5… via @BBCSport. Not if you let us put a keeper batsman higher than 7. He has a point. There isnt much room for spin back up. People have generally just put the best batsmen in the top 6, Root has to play because his bowling is becoming effective too.