Covering all FCS Basketball Schools

The Oregon players contracts will all still pay out regardless of who the coach is. And as along as we want college players to be enrolled in school I am not seeing an alternative here. But we will see a lawsuit on this someday.
Crazy that Altman’s timing and Oregon promoting an assistant means the Ducks players don’t get a portal opening until … after the season has started. Feels kinda wrong, no?
11
Only a matter of time before portal windows, enrollment dates are all challenged in court. Oregon players coach leaves in October. They are stuck there and there are no redshirt opportunities. In a commercial business this is illegal
With Oregon set to promote assistant coach and former DePaul head coach Tony Stubblefield to interim head coach, the transfer portal will not open for 31 days instead of 5 days after Altman's retirement. Similar to Michigan basketball this summer. on3.com/news/oregon-coach-da…
28
2 SoCon schools bringing in TRO players this year. Furman and Samford the 2 most aggressive and well resourced programs in the league no surprise.
Welcome back Chuck 🔥
1
59
Hopefully this level of fan intelligence reaches 50% of fans by the 2030. We are Euro Club sports economy now with no relegation and no transfer fees. Its going to be chaotic year to year.
Replying to @QE3FromTheVA
This is College sports now. How do you build on anything when the entire roster flips every year? Everyone is mentally living in an era that's never coming back. Every year will be it's own thing from now on, there will be no building in mid major football and basketball.
42
This is disingenuous because there isn't settled law on many of these issue. Are Eligibility rules commercial in nature? No court has answered that. Mr. Bilas is aware of this. And right now random state level courts can decide, week to week.
Replying to @PeterBurnsESPN
Respectfully, the NCAA needs to pass rules that don’t violate the law. Similar laments were made regarding the NCAA’s amateurism rules, and the players won, over and over. Still, the NCAA insists upon restricting athletes, only. How does every other multi-billion dollar industry in America avoid such legal challenges? They comply with the law. Simple.
1
13
He's quoting Jay Bilas. The tone deafness of Murphy/Booker is just astounding to me.
Listen to @JayBilas . College athletes create enormous economic value for schools, conferences, the NCAA, broadcasters, media companies, and more. It’s fundamentally unfair to restrict athletes’ rights while leaving other powerful actors in the college sports ecosystem largely unconstrained. op: @YouthInc
10
FCS BASKETBALL retweeted
totally agree on evaluation (see: cignetti). but the value of being the player whisperer is diminished when over-the-table money does the talking.
Amazing to me how many people think recruiting and talent evaluation just stopped in a system where everyone is a free agent every year.
3
10
183
30,698
Interesting point here. In Power 4 Basketball there is a school who did exactly this. They intentionally underspent in 2024 and 2025 in hopes of retaining 2 superstar freshman they signed in 24 and 25. Both players signed with Blue Bloods for more than the ENITRE BUDGET of their previous school.
I’m waiting for the first power program to intentionally target a future year to go all-in. Hey, 2027 and 2028 are off the table from a transfer perspective, we’re going to punt on those rosters, focus solely on HS recruiting and roster retention and pool our “free agent” resources from ‘27 and ‘28 and put them towards 2029 where we go all-in.
2
937
Amazing to me how many people think recruiting and talent evaluation just stopped in a system where everyone is a free agent every year.
it’s a lag. game has to catch up to coaches primary job changing from recruiter to strategist.
7
29,927
This is just the European pro sports model. Except they fire players just as fast. Hopefully we get there soon if this is the model we will be using going forward.
Sunday Thoughts: It feels like half of CFB is having an existential crisis. So many people want to fire their coach, even some with a good record and some with a new coach. Feels like we're in an unhealthy cycle and a weird place. Almost nobody can sustain anything.
56
This is an issue nationally now that Fan Funding has become the model in sports. Teams without historically strong donors and large alumni bases are going to be at massive disadvantages going forward
Danny White left because the alumni base had no money, UCF graduates mostly hospitality folks and they won’t have money. @TerryMohajirAD is safe because UCF has no money nor balls.
43
On the basketball side of things teams are starting scrimmages and exhibitions this week with no idea who is practicing. One P4 team alternates days of eligible lineups vs TRO lineups. Its beginning to effect the actual games.
This is why these temporary injunctions do more harm than good. Regardless of what side of the fence you sit on over these extra years of eligibility, all of these decisions need to be made before the season starts. Mid-season retroactive decisions just hurt the entire team.
1
46
Mitch Gilifillan another great follow for reporting of facts and not speculative commentary.
Devastating blow for the Ohio athletes. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded which means, “sorry, go prove it.” They remain ineligible and now return to the trial court facing a pending motion to dismiss. Discovery alone could take 3 to 5 months before a trial is even set.
2
61
If you are interested in legal reporting and not legal opinion follow Eric Blevins. Courts are flatly rejecting arguments others are telling us are fool proof.
Replying to @PeteNakos @On3
This would be interesting. The Kentucky appeals court specifically rejected that argument (as did the Ohio appellate court in Borovicanin earlier today- 2nd image).
22
Here we have a court essentially saying eligibility rules aren't anti trust rules. Also reducing the scope of Alston(which in general is far over cited by X users)
Replying to @samcehrlich
Another threshold issue that I wanted to see how the appellate court would handle is the traditional judicial deference for voluntary associations. And that's one area where the Court of Appeals said the trial court erred.
19
Eric Blevins is bringing the goods with real legal analysis. McCann esque!
Replying to @EricJBlevins
In the big picture, both Lorient and Wisne are narrow in that they only involve the class of '22 exclusion. This is a one-time issue that goes away on its own after this year. But, if a federal appellate court accepts their evidence of definition of the market, it could help future athlete antitrust lawsuits clear the first major hurdle and challenge "evergreen" issues like eligibility under the new 5-in-5 rule and more.
1
85
Courts consistently using Covid waiver against the NCAA while Sports Law Professors tell us 5 in 5 is Unique and won't be used in future lawsuits is really difficult to grapple with. Why can't we speak plainly on these issues.
Replying to @EricJBlevins
The court also thinks the NCAA's COVID waiver contradicts its current argument; court says it produced the same problems the NCAA points to in denying the c/o '22 a 5th season:
68
Probably Mit's best point that I wish more people would make is that the schools are literally CHOOSING to pay the maximum every time, only to ask the government to stop them. The problem that remains unsolved is how do schools find equal opponents if no one can enforce rules legally?
In 2025-26, 63 schools paid athletes the full amount allowed under the House settlement ($20.5M). There are 67 P4 schools plus Notre Dame. That means only 5 out of the 68 schools didn’t pay the full $20.5M. When NCAA comp caps go up, power schools usually quickly hit the cap.
1
78
The Class of 2022 is not a unique situation. Players are lining up to get 6th the heels of these lawsuits. At some point the legal experts of this field have to drop the idea that there is a line. PAVIA(JUCO) SORSBY(GAMBLING) KAUFMAN RENN(6TH YEAR) LSU PRO PLAYERS(PRO CONTRACT) Terrence Shannon (Title IX) Robbie Avila (Roster limits) Stop saying things like unique. Please
That's a fair point, but it seems evident that the Class of 2022 issue is very unique. If it's pressed in future litigation it'll be easy to say "They were within the firm five year clock, we made an incorrect call to exclude them, but we're sticking to that five year clock."
147
There are a ton of reasons this bill may not make it. A Texas rep disagreeing with Moody amendment will not be one of those reasons.
Just talked with my Texas rep: The Protect College Sports Act is “dead on arrival” in the House. Apparently the Moody amendment is a poison pill that kills any shot at passage. With funding the government the top priority post-midterms, this bill has a “snowball’s chance in hell” of surviving.
25