Update About @runupdotfun Thousands of people just crashed the site. LMAO,The hype is insane!!! If you secured the WL, You're safe. Team is working on it and will post updates soon. Keep patience and Keep faith on the team. $RUNNER will be the main runner of @injective . The game hasn't begin yet. B U L L I S H ......!!!!

POV: You are farming @arcus_xyz @bulktrade @entropyIO

Its time for bed now. Let those usdc arrive in the mean time and gear up my RUNUP!!!!! Giga Bullish on @runupdotfun

run it up. october 1st · 3:30pm utc don’t wait for launch. get ready now → runup.fun

Can My 62 referral bring one spot for me on the upcoming $RUNNER sale??????? Btw, @runupdotfun is launching tomorrow. Tighten your seat belt!

I just applied for @runupdotfun ! This one will be a cook!!!

Why prediction markets still feel complicated — and what ULTRAMINT changes Prediction markets are built around a simple idea: take a view on a future event and express that view through a market position. The concept is simple. The user experience often isn't. For someone who is already familiar with trading, concepts like bid/ask prices, order books, limit orders, counterparties, execution, gas fees and wallet transactions may feel normal. But for an everyday user, every additional concept becomes another point where they can hesitate, make a mistake, or simply leave. That is one of the biggest usability frictions in prediction markets: the actual question may be easy to understand, while the mechanics required to express a prediction can be much harder. In traditional order-book-based markets, traders interact with bids and offers. A participant can place an order at a particular price and quantity, wait for another participant to take the other side, or execute against existing liquidity. The CFTC describes order books as showing real-time bid and ask prices, and notes that traders can generally trade in and out of positions before settlement. That structure is powerful, but it introduces trading concepts that a prediction-market newcomer may not immediately understand. Imagine a simple question: “Will event X happen?” A first-time user should ideally be thinking about one thing: “I think YES is more likely.” Instead, a conventional trading interface can make the user think about several additional questions: What price should I bid? Is there enough liquidity? Will my order be filled? Should I use a market order or a limit order? Where is the counterparty? Can I exit later? What does the spread mean? And, in a blockchain-based environment, another question can appear: “Do I need network gas before I can even make this trade?” That is the friction ULTRAMINT is designed to move out of the user's way. According to ULTRAMINT's current Terms, its markets use a buy-only structure. A user acquires a position by staking collateral against a chosen outcome, and the position is priced by an automated market maker rather than an order book. The platform explicitly states that there is no bid/offer order book, no quoting, no order cancellation, no selling, no shorting and no secondary transfer of positions. Once acquired, a position is held to resolution. This changes the interaction model. Instead of asking users to participate in an order-driven market and manage orders against other traders, ULTRAMINT's model is centered around choosing an outcome and acquiring a position at the price generated by the automated market maker. That doesn't remove market risk. It doesn't mean prices cannot move. And it doesn't mean every execution will happen exactly at the displayed price. In fact, ULTRAMINT's terms explicitly warn that AMM prices move continuously and that execution can differ from the displayed price because of slippage. The interface currently provides price-tolerance choices of 0.5%, 1%, and 3%, with 0.5% as the default unless the user chooses otherwise. But the important UX distinction is that the user is not being asked to manage an order book. The pricing mechanism is automated. At a technical level, an automated market maker is a mechanism that calculates a market price from the state of the market rather than relying on a traditional list of resting bids and asks. On ULTRAMINT, the protocol contracts implement market creation, position acquisition, pricing, settlement, resolution and claims, while the terms describe the market itself as buy-only and AMM-priced. There is another layer of complexity that ULTRAMINT tries to abstract away: blockchain transaction fees. A blockchain application can be intuitive at the interface level while still forcing the user to understand network fees underneath. For a newcomer, “I need another token to pay gas before I can use the application” is a very different experience from simply authorizing the intended action. ULTRAMINT's gasless flow is designed around a relay service. Its Terms explain that the user signs an off-chain EIP-3009 transfer authorization. The Relay Service then submits the transaction to the blockchain and pays the network gas from an operator-controlled account. That distinction matters technically. The platform is not secretly taking control of the user's wallet. The terms state that the wallet is non-custodial and that ULTRAMINT does not hold the user's keys or sign transactions on the user's behalf. Instead, the user authorizes a specific transaction, and the relay service handles blockchain submission and gas payment. The authorization itself is constrained: the terms say it fixes the payer, recipient market, amount and validity window, and can only be spent by the specific market contract named in the authorization. There are still trade-offs and limitations. Gasless does not mean the blockchain disappears. The transaction is still written on-chain, and ULTRAMINT explicitly says that relayed transactions remain public and permanent on the blockchain. The relay service can also experience delays, rate limits, congestion or unavailability, and the platform does not guarantee that every signed instruction will be relayed or executed. Likewise, buy-only trading does not mean the position can simply be sold whenever the user wants. ULTRAMINT's terms specifically state that positions cannot be sold, shorted or transferred and are held to resolution. So the interesting part of ULTRAMINT isn't simply that it is another prediction-market interface. The more specific design choice is that it attempts to reduce the amount of trading infrastructure the everyday user has to understand before expressing a prediction. The friction can be described very simply: Traditional prediction-market interaction can expose users to order books, bids, asks, order management and blockchain transaction complexity. ULTRAMINT instead combines a buy-only position model with automated market-maker pricing and a gasless relay flow, so the core interaction can be reduced to a much simpler question: “What outcome do I believe in, and how much do I want to stake on it?” That is a much more focused mental model for a prediction market. The technology underneath is still complex. The user interface doesn't have to make the user carry all of that complexity. Conventional friction: order-book and blockchain mechanics can introduce additional concepts—bids, asks, order execution, liquidity and gas—that can make prediction markets harder for newcomers to navigate. ULTRAMINT's alternative: ULTRAMINT uses buy-only positions priced by an automated market maker and offers a gasless relay flow that handles network-gas payment for relayed transactions. Technical explanation: in ULTRAMINT's gasless flow, the user signs an EIP-3009 authorization off-chain; the Relay Service submits the authorized transaction on-chain and pays the network gas, while the protocol remains responsible for recording the position and executing the market logic. Prediction markets are supposed to help people express informed views about future outcomes. The more of the underlying infrastructure that can be handled without forcing every user to become a trader, market-maker or blockchain operator, the closer the interface can get to the original idea: Choose an outcome. Express a view. Let the market mechanics happen underneath.

What does @galileowilson knows that we don't??????

REPUBLIC FIELD DISPATCH // RAID QUEUE Entered The Republic today with one mission: complete a real community Raid from start to finish. Picked an active Raid, checked the deadline, read every requirement, then joined with supplies. Field note: never act before reading the card. 🧵

Everyone bid on the product but i bid on the founder. @vibevibefun is trending now and those who knows @meta_alchemist can guess how big the Launchpad is going to be! Position Yourself. Storm is coming. ❤️

My SmartX trader type: “The Alpha Caller.” “Three hours of research. Two-word thesis: send it.” Find yours in 6 questions. Join the waitlist for up to 50% off fees and a share of 10,000 USDT in rewards. smartx.io/waitlist/?invite=m…

Yo @bankrbot launch a token on robinhood called RUG and pair it with $musebook Give @_HeyZing the creator fees!

🎉 CYPHERSQUAD WINNERS 🎉 8 GTD + 2 team @0xShihab7 @0xStephen_ @RifatOfficiall @dhakacrypto_ @Ujan_Crypto @VANTA_MR7 @PancarMotoru0 @MDmannan767346

CYPHERSQUAD IS COMING TO ZCASH 10 GTD spots for our community. 6,000 pixel hackers. Free mint. • Follow @CypherSquadZec & @_HeyZing • Like & RT their pinned post • Drop your ZEC wallet below 24 hours only.

Even though @arc is dead on the first day! We caught couple of runners! 😬 #CBALPHA_COOKING_HARD❤️

Another meme token launched on @Arguspad! And earned 120$ creator fee! Free stimmy is always appreciated! Gud tek😬

Playing with the snipers is tooo much fun! Earned More than 400$+ Fee's till now! @arc Mood On😬 Good tek, khekkkk 😬

20 ARC APE GTD GIVEAWAY! 6,666 Apes coming to Arc. • Follow @arcapenft & @_HeyZing • Like + RT • Drop your EVM wallet below Good luck everyone!