Brahmansism, Hinduism and Secularism; the Trifecta of understanding political control and its relationship with Shudras and the Bhakti movement. Rise of Protestant movement which made way for Separation of the state and church, gave rise to Secularism , however we don't find the same separation between the Brahminism and Hinduism, although movements like the Bhakti movement seems to make an attempt to bring Gods beyond the control of Hindu clergy yet such attempts fails upon the anvil of reforms as the core of Bhakti movement through it constituting elements like Naam Japa and Kirtan points towards the attempted inclusion of the Shudras within the Hindu fold, while remaining subservient to the Idea of Brahminism and the authority of the Brahman is not challenged; To further substantiate the deep rooted Mindset against Shudras, i would point towards the statements of the current ShankarAcharyas of Puri and of Joytir matha, who on record have categorically denied the right of Shudras to take Sanyas, pointing out that the religious text do not permit for such a thing. what's also interesting is the caveat drawn by ShankarAcharya of Puri who say that "Dharam is cheez ki anumati (Shudras to take Sanyas) nahi deta, parantu kisi ko phal se vanchit nahi keya hai", implying that if a Shudras wants to attain moksha, they can only do so by serving the 3 Dwija i.e., Brahmin, Kshatriya & Vaishya (as is stated in the Shastras upon the Duties of a Shudras); It seems The Bhakti movement was started for allowing the Sudras with an alternative to the "PHALA" for furtherance of their Spiritual journey within the Hindu fold and such was done while keeping the Hindu clergy in the center, Rituals still remained closely guarded by the Brahmins and were only reserved for the Dwija, Showing that unlike western Secularism where the Ideas was of undoing the control of clergy upon Christian Faith, Bhakti movement was a rather pacifist movement designed at curbing the growing discontent among the Shudras; constructed to proactively manage their discontent after observing their upward economic mobility in the society, which if left unattended would surely pose a threat to Brahmin's Ideological hold on Hinduism as fewer patrons would financially aid towards the furtherance of their ritualistic practices while at the same time subscribing to opposing or divergent ritualistic sects including but not limited to Buddhism, Jainism and Islam, followed by Patronage to Christians. Over at least the last two millennium the Brahmin always made sure he was not only politically powerful and but socially relevant, be that through declaration of kings divine authority, linking the births, birth of their Dynasty to mythological figures, Mythological stories or by comparing their rule with those experienced in the different lokas and further the use of religious Texts like the Manusmriti, Ushna Smriti to subjugate the general populous; thereby effectively using the carrot and the stick approach for their political holds; Carrot for the Kings and Stick for everybody else. These texts openly advocated for the exclusion of Shudras from ritualistic elevation and even mandates punishment for Shudras making found guilty of attempting such feat, thereby exercising control over them through the executive, legislative and since the judiciary comprised of those who have been educated under such texts it would naturally cohort the like minded, thereby making the Shudras hapless upon the desires of the Brahmin controlling the entire system. Inclusion was the bait. Hierarchy was the hook, the door to heaven was cracked open but the keys are yet to be surrendered, Bhakti movement did not break Brahmanism. It taught the excluded to sing inside it—and called that liberation. PS: This piece is confined towards the North Indian Bhakti movement which came about in the 15th century, while South India's Bhakti movement deserves it own elaborate piece to justify its history from the 7th century.

Man suffers only because he takes seriously what the gods made for fun

Classical case of Game theory, Blue would win; The implied position being that in the coming times Tribalism (nature to organize oneselves into self serving groups) is going to increase drastically.

Maybe that's what Quantum entanglement would feel like 😂

EWS reservation is proof that caste and caste based discrimination still exists today, not just in Social life but political/legislative realm aswell, as if not then why is an opportunity not given to SC-ST-OBC to give up their caste certificate and fight under as a general category under EWS, surely it would have been a start for much more egalitarian society, but as i have conversed and experienced personally on matter on caste and reservation, it seems more of "Purity thing" and this is not confined to Villages, although its more overt there, the same mindset has been quietly hibernated in cities aswell and its application is much more covert as cities do not offer the same social and political cover as Villages and small town does. Even your baisc assumption that govt policies are furthering caste and its not the cheap societal hierarchy created by the Brahmin that is being addressed by the Govt, is false. i have seen vile comments on SC-ST-OBC on social media, how many of such vile creatures have been put to task under SC-ST act, afterall those casteist slurs, owing to their history in discrimination, suppression and abuse hold more weight than any other. The answer being non, SC-ST act is a paper tiger when it comes to online abuse, i would like it to be more strengthened to the point that such psychological abuses are rightfully dealt with. from the last line it seems like you are more concerned about ending reservation than caste and caste based discrimination with casues reservation in the first place, it more like you want to attack the precaution but not the disease.

If this can happen in 2026, understanding how the British managed to rule us from 1757 to 1947 is a no-brainer.

The idea that Hinduism will fall without the Brahmin is a western construct, more specifically, drawn from 1543 St Xaviers letter to Rome. In fact As written by Amedkar, Brahmin and his Idea of caste is the reason that Hinduism is not a Global, missionary religion and also that it prevents Hindus from Creating a Real Society or Nation. PS: Will be writing more on this in the Future.

Mughal royal harems were guarded by eunuchs, and Rajputs were also stationed at certain posts, according to historical accounts. History is more complex than today’s glorified narratives.

Nothing change Rajput-Mughal relations.

An ideal Society envisioned by the Brahmin.

meghnad saha ( nominated 7 times for nobel) Meghnad Saha’s early life was marked by systemic caste-based humilation and poverty. Born in 1893 in Seoratali (a small village near Dhaka, in present-day Bangladesh) to a family belonging to the Sunri caste—traditionally considered a low, backward caste of liquor vendors and small shopkeepers—he faced societal discrimination that attempted to limit his life at every step. 1. Humiliation in Village Schools and Boarding Lodges Refusal of Shelter: As a child, Saha had to leave his village to attend a middle school in a neighboring town. Many upper-caste households refused to rent him a room or give him lodging because of his caste background. A local doctor, Ananta Kumar Das, eventually took him in, but Saha was made to clean his own plates and perform household chores that upper-caste boarders were spared. 2. Segregation in College Dining Halls The Eden Hindu Hostel Incident (Calcutta): When Saha moved to Kolkata in 1911 to study at the prestigious Presidency College, he was admitted to the Eden Hindu Hostel. Several upper-caste boarders refused to sit or dine in the same mess hall as him because his presence was seen as "polluting". He was forced to eat in separate spaces. 3. Barred from Religious Worship During his time at the Eden Hindu Hostel, upper-caste Brahmin students physically blocked Saha from participating in and offering prayers during the Saraswati Puja (the celebration honoring the goddess of learning). The deep irony—that a young scholar who would go on to decode the composition of stars was barred from praying to the deity of knowledge because of his birth—left a permanent scar on him. 4. Economic Disadvantage & Expulsion Because low-caste families were largely excluded from wealthy land-owning or commercial networks, Saha’s family lived in acute poverty. His father, Jagannath Saha, ran a tiny grocer’s shop and initially opposed Meghnad’s education, needing him to work in the shop. In 1905, while studying on a merit scholarship at Dhaka Collegiate School, Saha participated in a student boycott against the British Governor, Sir Bampfylde Fuller, during the Bengal Partition protests. He was expelled and had his scholarship stripped. Without family wealth to back him up, continuing his education required immense sacrifice from his elder brother. Impact on His Mindset and Career These early humiliations shaped Saha into a lifelong champion against caste hierarchy, religious orthodoxy, and social inequality: Social Reformer: Unlike many contemporaries who kept science separate from social politics, Saha used his position to write extensively against the caste system and priestly dogma. Independent MP: In 1952, he ran for the Indian Parliament (Lok Sabha) as an independent candidate and won, using his platform to advocate for mass education, river planning, national industrialization, and equal opportunities for marginalized groups.

“People don’t want to hear your opinion. They want to hear their opinion coming out of your mouth.”

The Hindu caste system, and the Hindu religion itself, isn’t owed anything other than what other systems or religions are routinely given, which is analysis and criticism. Hinduism and the caste system aren’t beyond critique. Further, trying to equate criticism with “hate” is ludicrous. No system and no religion is above reproach. God has bestowed upon us freedom of thought and conscience as a human right.

Additionally how he has used Modi's name to hide behind a convenient and popular cover to play this nefarious game.

will be posting long form essay on how Amit Shah masterminded this political games on 10th. Will try to cover the psychological tactics + Criminal Tactics + political tools that were crafted by him.

क्या रे IPS प्रशांत, अपने घर पर भी अपने बच्चों से ऐसे गाली देकर बात करता है क्या? थोड़ी भी शर्म और अपने बच्चों की नज़र में इज़्ज़त रखना चाहता है, तो नौकरी से इस्तीफ़ा दे और माफ़ी माँग ले। IPS पर धब्बा है, देश पर कलंक है।

13,000,000 people are said to have suffered disenfranchisement under "modified form 6", which was not approved by 2 other ECI, this is a breakdown of Mechanism and we don't have democracy in this country because we follow Veda or any other religious book, it exits through the constitution and the democratize procedure laid under it. The undermining of those democratic procedure is the breakdown of democracy and under the same Constitution we also have the right to protest; protest by it very definition is not a popularity contest or the sole right of the majority, it exists for every single person. How is that so hard to understand.

Being a RW is so easy. No critical thinking required. You can just be yourself - racist, classeist, casteist, homophobic. No fighting w yourself or the society. Just follow what your parents and society taught you, and hate on minorities collectively. So low effort.

if principles of Free market Economy is implemented in India, how can Ambani hire Bollywood superstars to act as servers in their Wedding. I know such concepts are alien in the west but the Brahmin-Baniya ego thrives on such show and pomps.