I just took a position to sell my ETH if 8363 doesn't pass! (and to buy more if it does)
Seer's market essentially splits the ETH token into 2; one where 8363 passes and one where it doesnt
ETH holders bearish on 8363 place orders like "if it doesnt pass, buy more eth" or "if it does pass, sell my eth".
the trade reverts on whichever outcome didn't happen and executes for the one that does
for eg, if 8363 is included in hegota
> the bears position "if passed sell eth" executes and they get usds
> their corresponding position "if not passed, buy eth" reverts and they get usds back
Given sufficient volume these markets can provide useful information on price impact for passing EIPs
however, the main drawback to getting volume is it locks traders into the price of eth at the time of the trade
so in this case, if eth is included in hegota, the bears will receive the dollar value of ETH as of today, not the price in october which may be higher or lower
which in my view makes it more of a platform to hedge your position than actually predict price impact
@MetaDAOProject has a similar issue, which they mitigate by only keeping trades open for 3 days compared to this market that's open for 3 months. but the deviance b/w spot prices on the open market & the one in the futarchy split universe persists there too
for those interested i have some thoughts for a price futarchy design that could neatly solve this problem 🔜
Voting by validators on issuance is biased, so here's a better mechanism:
if you're bearish on 8363, auto buy ETH if it does not pass or sell ETH if it does
& if bullish, auto sell eth if it passes or buy if it does
price will show the gwei