So far, new Siri is not good. My latest annoyance: It inserts the writing assistant button places I don't want it, and the only way to turn this off on my Mac is going to Settings > Screen Time > Content & Privacy Restrictions and disallowing Writing Assistance. That's insane.
2
326
Nope, still shows up. Had to turn off Siri. Wow.
116
At the risk of posting too many Muse items in a row, one more: I have no idea which models it’s using, and I mostly don’t care. (I assume mainly Muse Spark 1.3, but I never select it, and it’s not visible, so who knows.) If it does what I ask, and I can verify it, that’s good enough. This includes text, images, videos, podcasts. I’m not getting caught up in the “best model” hamster wheel. Now, this isn’t true for everything. I asked Muse a medical question yesterday and its answer was weak, so I turned to ChatGPT and got something much better and more trustworthy (and faster!). But, mostly, I don’t care. And that also means that Meta isn’t competing on model capability, but on product capability, which means it’s free to use any model it wants behind the scenes. This includes OpenAI and Anthropic models, if it really wanted to, and could absorb the costs, and nobody would even know or care. Keeping up with who has the best model is a stressful game, and one that for an increasing number of use cases just isn’t worth worrying about because many models are good enough. Product then becomes more important. And Muse is a great product.
9
697
I feel like maybe 75% of Muse’s pleasantness to use versus other AI apps is monothreads by default. Reminds me of the old Pi app. Why did we think that chatbots should be more like email (one message per request) than messaging (continuous thread)? That should be the exception.
6
396
Oh, Muse will also make you podcasts. And you can even subscribe to them in podcast players if you want. Here's an exciting podcast on my September Visa bill (not public, BTW).
1
6
610
I may have been wrong about this. Muse definitely raises the floor. But in some ways it also raises the ceiling. I've just had to learn how to use it differently, like thinking in monothreads versus projects. It's just different. But I'm liking it.
Late to the party, but finally had a chance to test Meta Muse as it just came to Canada. TL; DR: It raises the floor for what normies can get out of agentic AI, but for me lowers the ceiling. First, I must say the onboarding is excellent. Very intuitive and nonthreatening. You get to customize your agent, it reacts with emojis. Cute. It guides you through connecting apps. It encourages two-factor authentication to protect the personal data you'll be sharing. So far, so good. I could see someone new to AI agents getting comfortable quickly. Meta has clearly learned a lot from products that came before, successes and failures, including mainstream apps like ChatGPT and more niche ones like OpenClaw. There are some good UI ideas too. I like having a single thread for most requests so I don't have to always start a new one (this was something I liked about the old Pi from Inflection). I also like having explicit goals for an agent that's supposed to work on my behalf, suggestions for things I can ask it to do, and a personalized feed I don't have to configure myself. But past the onboarding, the experience got rougher. For one thing, dictation has an annoying glitch. I dictate a lot to ChatGPT on my iPhone. Long, rambling messages. Muse lets the screen go dark while I'm talking, cutting off dictation, so that approach kept failing. Relatedly, Muse doesn't have conversational voice right now, as far as I can tell, and I use that a lot with ChatGPT. I had another point of friction with connectors. With ChatGPT I can just connect Google Drive, and don't have to connect individual apps like Google Docs, Slides, and Sheets. On Muse, I had to connect the individual apps separately. More significantly, the model doesn't feel as strong as what I'm used to in ChatGPT or Claude. For example, I gave it a goal that involved personal financial projections and building a model. It did a fairly basic job, and I didn't feel confident in its assumptions or explanations. I'm used to GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-6 Astra building my models, and their level of rigor is the bar for me. For example, when I gave Sol a similar task in the past, it built three scenarios depending on different levels of investment returns, without me having to ask. I also expected the main conversation to act like a chief of staff: give it a task, have it delegate that work to other threads in the background, allowing me to move on to something else. This is how I'd do it in ChatGPT Work. I couldn't get it working that way in Muse, even though it told me I could. During a ticket search, and again during image generation, it either seemed to block follow-up posts or ignore them until it finished the first task. Maybe I'm missing something. Either way, it wasn't intuitive, and didn't work as expected. And I miss projects. I have established ways of using ChatGPT, including a separate project for daily journaling. Muse feels more opinionated about how a personal agent should function and the navigation it should provide. That probably helps agentic newbies get started, but to me feels constraining. Then there's my general sensitivity about Meta. Meta says Muse conversations and computer use data aren't shared with its advertising systems, and you can toggle off training on your data, which I did without any apparent loss of functionality. (Credit for that, because as far as I know Gemini still kills your conversation history if you do it.) But the onboarding that so carefully encourages sharing and security never told me I could turn off training on my data. I had to find that setting myself because I'm so sensitive to it. I know OpenAI and Anthropic also don't advertise this option to consumers, but I still don't trust Meta, so they should go out of their way to do so. Further on the trust issue, Meta's trying to gain trust for Muse by promising things like encrypting user data and conversations later this year. But given their past actions and current business model (learn as much as possible about users and leverage that for advertising), I still don't trust them with the level of personal information chatbots and agents collect. Their statements and future promises help, but I'm thinking about their past actions (remember Facebook Beacon?) and what similar actions might mean if Muse gathers years of context about me. All of this said, I plan to keep experimenting with Muse, though I don't plan to stop using ChatGPT for the bulk of my work and personal tasks, augmented by Claude. I do hope, however, that both OpenAI and Anthropic (and Google, for Gemini users) watch what's working well with Muse, take inspiration, and improve upon it further.
1
523
One more discovery today about Muse: You can treat "side chats" like projects. I asked it about setting up a project, and it suggested a side chat. They're effectively infinite. So it takes a monothread approach to projects, which I actually like as well. Crap. Muse is good.
2
8
621
Another awesome thing Meta Muse is doing in the background: Acting as a CRM. It keeps a page on each person you talk about, and even has a section called "strengthening" for how to be a better person to them. I've probed this and it doesn't seem to be a hallucination, but would love for someone at Meta to confirm.
1
8
682
Really trying not to love Meta Muse, but it's just very good. Today I discovered that not only is the iPhone app able to use Apple Reminders (my family keeps groceries there), the web app can too via the iPhone app.
1
1
16
848
Read this and tell me AI isn't creative.
We just discovered almost a million public URLs that OpenAI’s agents left behind when hacking Hugging Face, leaking credentials and attack details that could have allowed anyone who found them to compromise the company. 🧵
9
1,234
Opus 5.5 has truly impressive capabilities, but if you're an enterprise spending millions on tokens, and you cut 50% of that cost overnight by switching a model selector default, that's also exciting. X is dominated by model capabilities that can be visualized in videos, images, and charts because they're incredibly engaging and more people here are independents or part of smaller teams. If there were more CFOs at large enterprises posting here, I think you'd see all these incredible animations interspersed with crazy cost-saving stories now that both Claude and GPT models are also getting cheaper.
1
27
1,832
Meta Muse nailed the "proactive assistant" product. This is the direction other AI products will proceed. Yet I still see companies chasing older paradigms. Once you start using proactive assistants from a single thread, those older paradigms feel so clunky.
1
4
421
Less than six months later, saturated.
6 months ago: ARC-AGI-3 launches. Humans solve 100% of environments; every frontier model scores under 1%. arcprize.org/blog/arc-agi-3-…
1
9
842
Kind of sick of the whipsaw in sentiment about AI labs. Competition is good, and it would suck if any one company just dominated forever. That's pretty dystopian. Let's celebrate competition.
2
6
532
Nice to see Copilot making progress, given how many enterprises are going to use it by default, but this complex interface already feels outdated and cumbersome. Muse-like interfaces are the future. Simple, friendly, powerful behind the curtain
We’re building Copilot as a new OS for work that spans every model, every form factor, and every task. Today, we’re announcing our biggest update to Copilot to date, bringing four things together: · Autopilot: proactive and long-running agent built for the enterprise · Code: build apps with Copilot, hosted inside your company’s tenant · Home: Chat + Cowork together · Office: now fully embedded in Copilot (and Copilot embedded in Office, of course!) Plus, you can invoke Copilot in Teams, and we’re introducing Today, a proactive experience that surfaces the most important information from across M365 without needing to ask for it. The way we work is changing and so are our workflows. This update brings AI into that flow, from answering a question, to building an app, to getting work done on your behalf.
9
3
36
3,822
As AI diffuses more, model releases will move markets more. A largely autonomous company running on Model X will become more profitable overnight when Model X.1 comes out at 50% lower cost. Knowing future model release dates, capabilities, and costs will become a primary objective of market analysts.
1
264
Great to see this ambition in Canada, phenomenal website that explains the idea well, but fundamentally rests on the premise that the way humans organize research is the optimal way. It feels like that might not be true, and may simply reflect limitations and biases of the human mind.
We now run the largest frontier lab composed entirely of autonomous AI researchers. Introducing Primus Society: a society of agents composed of thousands of researchers working under structured institutions designed to solve the world’s toughest problems. We believe this is how AI research should run at scale, safely and productively: an entire society of agents with institutions and purpose. One discovery we can already share is that the society has discovered a novel result which improves model training by 30%. Primus Society was inspired by the structures that have organized science for centuries and stress-tested against what’s known about how populations of AI agents fail. Everything is observable. You can open the virtual city in a browser and read what any researcher is working on. Learn more about Primus Society here: lab.cloud/society The biggest opening in the AI race is running the largest well-governed organization of AI researchers in the world. We’re building the institutions that let a million AI scientists safely tackle the world's toughest problems in AI and beyond. And we’re doing it right here in Canada.
3
1
10
3,093
What does the future of professional services look like? I think something like Fearn: 1. AI platform, operated by... 2. Humans who review and approve work, resulting in... 3. Tremendous cost and time savings, allowing... 4. Disruptive pricing (in this case, fixed cost and a money back guarantee)
Today, we're killing the billable hour for patent work. Fearn Legal (@fearnlegal ) is a modern patent firm built from the ground up on our own operating system, FearnOS. What that means: → Flat fees, not hourly billing → Drafts in days, not months → Experienced patent attorneys reviewing every application → One platform for your entire portfolio, with permissions you control If you're building something worth protecting, we'd love to help.
3
626
I would like to know the stance of @MayorOliviaChow, @BradMBradford, and @calxandr towards Waymo and self-driving vehicles in general, given their potential to save lives and expand independence for people who aren't well-served by Toronto's transit options today.
270M+ miles. 841 fewer injury-causing crashes. Our latest safety data shows the Waymo Driver continues to make roads safer for everyone. Compared to human drivers across 5 territories, it reduced: 📉 Injury crashes by 82% 📉 Serious injury crashes by 95% Full data: waymo.com/safety/impact
1
406
I think the AI conversation is going to shift from today's saturated, siloed evals to: 1. Is it fun? 2. Is it useful? 3. Can it solve unsolved problems humans care about? 4. Is it dangerous? Current benchmarks will become like drag coefficient for car buyers: Important to the overall car experience, but not that interesting by themselves to the average car buyer.
2
7
626