Jess Wilson may have a problem today because of: A Liberal MP A trip to the United States Photos with Gina Rinehart’s media man Photos quietly vanishing And in half an hour, a One Nation event linked to the Liberal MP’s family Let’s unpack this /1

Our friend @SquizzSTK made a representative clip of #QT that encapsulates the ‘pain in the ass’ quality, Member for #Goldstein,adds to the session. @TimWilsonMP may be most ejected MP in this crucial fact-finding setting. #LNPclown is heavy on snark,light on substance.#auspol

Stollen. Ity encapsulate the detritus neatly.

Nazeem Hussain: The easiest way to lose your job in Australia. Yep. #FreePalestine

I'd suggest Pickering is more a man who has somehow managed to avoid conviction, than he is a "man of conviction". #auspol #springst

#Hughesy coughed up the tax-deductible $3,000 for charity Blue Knot after losing a bet with @aaronsmith. And @DHughesy is already getting mileage from it. But here's the kicker: _______________________ Dear Dave, This is a really important concept for you to grasp. It may take a while to sink in, but let's try. 🤞 Fingers crossed this doesn't go over your head. Oh, FUCK. I mentioned the head. I promised myself I wasn't going there. Anyway. First, let's acknowledge your $3,000 donation to Blue Knot. Good. Genuinely good. But let's not immediately begin polishing the halo for #BrandHughesy. You didn't wake up one morning, overcome by a spontaneous desire to support a local charity, and think: "You know what? Blue Knot could really use $3,000. Better fix that." No. You got into a bet with Aaron after accusing him of effectively being a Labor cheerleader who never criticised Labor. Aaron said: prove it. You couldn't. Then $100 for every example criticising Labor, donated to charity. You agreed. Aaron produced 30. Thirty. So you paid $3,000. A deal's a deal, and to your credit, you honoured it. But then came the spin: "I gladly donated 3k to Blue Knot. A local charity looking after local people." Lovely. Now, perhaps you had donated to Blue Knot before. We couldn't find any reference to it. Maybe you have. That's not really the point. The point is that, once again, you have taken an event in which you were demonstrably wrong, extracted the one part that makes you look good, and presented the story as though the central takeaway is: DAVE HUGHES: LOCAL CHARITY MAN. See Robin Hood clip, link below. No, Hughesy. The central takeaway is that you accused Aaron of something, couldn't substantiate it, set the price of being wrong at $100 a post, and then discovered Aaron had more examples than you had anticipated. That's how Blue Knot got $3,000. And, by the way, if the donation is tax deductible and you claim it, thank Jim Chalmers for preserving the deduction you can claim against your taxable income. Go on, Dave. Say thanks. But here's the really important bit. The bit you still don't seem to understand. Aaron is not obliged to write positive things about the #Liberal Party, #OneNation, or anyone else, simply to satisfy your personal definition of "balance". If Aaron examines something you say and concludes it's wrong, he can say it's wrong. If he examines a Labor government and concludes it's wrong, he can say it's wrong. And he has. Thirty times, at least, according to the price tag you agreed to yourself. That does not make him biased. It means he writes about what he wants to write about. Which is rather interesting coming from you. Because, Dave, we have noticed something. You spend an extraordinary amount of time attacking Labor. Post after post. Rant after rant. And somehow we don't recall you applying the same rigorous standard to yourself: "Hang on. I've criticised Labor again. Better immediately find something nasty to say about the Coalition, otherwise people might think I'm biased." Nope. Apparently Aaron must meet the #Hughesy Balance Quota™, while Dave Hughes is free to spend his days berating Labor, attacking its ministers, defending Coalition figures and now appearing at Liberal Party campaign events. But Aaron, correcting your factual errors? BIAS. Aaron not writing enough anti-Labor posts for your liking? BIAS. Aaron asking you to provide evidence after you call a government crooked? ASIO VAN. Mate. This is the kettle calling the kettle black. I considered making a joke about your pipe being black too, but I want you to focus. The point is painfully simple: You are accusing Aaron of exactly the selective political behaviour you engage in yourself. Except Aaron's posts generally involve evidence, facts and correcting claims you have made. Yours are increasingly an exciting blend of: 𖧀 vibes; 𖧀 outrage; 𖧀 a podcast memory you may not be "sure" about; and several paragraphs explaining why the person asking you for evidence is the real problem. Then, when you're finally pinned down, we get: "Let's all stay civil." Followed by a story about Ginger having a hard wrestle in the dog park. Mate, go back and read some of your own posts before delivering a TED Talk on civility. Your entire strategy seems to be: →Make a big claim. →Get challenged. →Fail to substantiate it. →Change the subject. →Move the goalposts. →Find one tiny unrelated point that makes you look good. →Announce that everyone should now be civil. That's not keeping government to account. That's spin management for Brand Hughesy. And this is the bit that keeps escaping you: You do not get to demand that another person manufacture criticism of a political party just to make you more comfortable with their credibility. You also don't get to spend your own feed relentlessly bagging Labor and then point at someone else and say: "Why aren't you bagging them as much as I think you should?" Because that isn't a standard. That's just hypocrisy with an iPad. Now, your waffle may fool some people, but for those with IQs above their shoelaces, you're becoming remarkably easy to read. So here's how to solve this enormous contradiction, Dave. You don't have to write positive things about Labor. Aaron doesn't have to write negative things about Labor. Neither of you owes the other a politically balanced quota. But when you accuse someone of bias, and they prove you wrong 30 times at $100 a pop, perhaps the adult response is not to immediately invent a new standard and pretend you were basically right all along. It's: "I was wrong. Sorry, Aaron." That's it. Five words. And if that concept is still too difficult to digest, perhaps get Ginger to explain it to you at the tap. Remember, Brand Hughesy: accountability is for everyone else. Links: FRAMED x.com/TheNoisyTrunk/status/2… PUPPY LOVE (Dr. Doolittle talks to dogs - AND THEY TALK BACK): x.com/TheNoisyTrunk/status/2… Dave Hughes aka Robbing Hood x.com/TheNoisyTrunk/status/2… BONUS: We may be able to offer signed Hughesy framed promo items on eBay - All profits to #BlueKnot if we can convince Cooker Boy to cooperate on our terms: x.com/TheNoisyTrunk/status/2…

Fun fact: One Nations hero, Tommy Robinson, has a longer list of criminal records than 99% of immigrants coming into Australia

You little beauty.... 👏👏👏 ✨️ @NickMcKim

So Canada supplies 61% of foreign oil to U.S. and 81% of imported electricity to the U.S. across the Eastern seaboard…home to largest cities Trump’s trade war against their closest ally, who have fought alongside them across many wars, sound more idiotic each day

One Nation now has a higher migration target than Labor.

First time trump has slept beside melania in years.

We love our Kylie she’s made us proud of our country and its people .. I almost feel sorry for LNP, ON voters of whom we are ashamed

Strongly agree with @caitoz and well said✌️💜

A pure unadulterated cunt @Hillel_Newman 😡

One Nation is finally announcing their candidates for Victoria - and if their history is anything to go by, there’s going to be some real doozies in there.

It’s only Monday and we’ve found Tweet of the week @Peter_Fitz #auspol Courtesy: @just_brash

The Barbershop Joke. Trump and Obama end up in the same barbershop and get a shave from two different barbers in total silence. The barbers are too nervous to speak, worried any topic might turn into a political argument. When the shave is finished, Trump's barber reaches for the aftershave. Trump stops him quickly and says, "No thanks. My wife, Melania, will smell that and think I've been in a brothel." The second barber turns to Obama and asks, "How about you, Mr. Obama?" Obama replies, "Go right ahead, my wife Michelle doesn't know what the inside of a brothel smells like."