You are as much an oligarch - an American one - as you are accusing Indian businessmen of being one. So between an American and an Indian oligarch who should the Government of India or its people choose? Pretty simple, is it not?

What would happen if you left India in 2001 and returned today in 2026? A glimpse of what changed in 25 years of Modi......only a glimpse though 🙂 #25YearsOfSeva

Typical Jihadi style video. Hiding behind women by putting them in front. No matter @RahulGandhi clan is so inspired by Hamas.

thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/i… @amishra77 on PM Modi's quarter century in an executive role - half as CM and half as PM.

A good day to start my journey on @Substack. My first article: Modi@25 - What changed at the Societal Level amishra77.substack.com/p/mod…

I am now on @substack as well. Do join in. substack.com/@amishra77

Why @narendramodi has held national attention for 25 years running and will define our national standards for many decades to come, explains @amishra77 thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/i…

#25YearsOfSeva : The legacy of 25 uninterrupted years as head of government. My latest article. thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/i… …………………. The premises he (Modi) has made universal are harder to contest. No half solutions; no problem left to fester. India belongs at the frontier. Ambition must be world scale. Democracy must be built on delivery. India’s civilisational self is a world good. The marginalised are citizens to be empowered and left free to flourish. Look around and decide which of these would you want changed? If your answer is none then you have also answered why Modi has held national attention for 25 years running and will define our national standards for many decades to come.

My article in @the_hindu on #25YearsOfSeva of PM Modi. thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/i… I argue in the article that like all nation builders in history, PM Modi in these 25 years has also left 6 premises that will outlays his tenure; compel all future leaders, irrespective of political affiliation, to follow them; and they will be the standard future leaders will be measured against. 1Finishing the job: Perhaps the most defining. Water problem in Gujarat, Financial inclusions, Article 370, Naxalism, Ram Mandir - once taken up then No half-solutions. Complete solution. 2End of diffidence: private rockets, private nuclear, Pakistan's air bases struck in May 2025. No more hesitation or waiting for someone else to set standard. Leader not follower mindset. 3World-scale ambition: 220 crore vaccine doses. Anything smaller now reads as failure. 4Democracy on delivery: identity alone wins no election at scale. Delivery is a vote bank. 5Civilisational resurgence: a Ram Mandir and a Gaganyaan, Tamil and Bengali alike, no contradiction. 6Dignity: 25 crore out of poverty. The poor are citizens to be empowered, not a parade. Women are leaders in their own right, across the spectrum.

Can’t even acknowledge an Indian hero because his actions saved Israeli citizens. Acknowledging Capt Smit Machchhar would mean acknowledging Israelis are also humans. And that would mean antagonising the vote bank. You have spent the last four years taking the side of Hamas so how can you now suddenly take the side of innocent Israelis. THAT is the dilemma facing likes or @RahulGandhi and @priyankagandhi and hence their silence. Now imagine the life of lesser Congress coolies.

My salute to the Indian pilot Captain Smit Machchhar for his extraordinary bravery. Despite being stabbed and seriously injured, he fought back, resisted, opened the cockpit door, and enabled passengers and crew to overpower the attacker — preventing a catastrophic mid-air disaster. He saved the lives of 174 people, including Israeli citizens and other nationals. I wish Captain Machchhar a speedy and full recovery. He is a true hero.

I have watched this video on a loop. Had tears seeing how she smashed everyone. What a beast of a run. This is how, India, will also lead the world one day. It is hard work. It will take time. But our country will do it.

Watch this acceleration by Vithya Ramraj to overtake the Chinese athlete in the final leg! - Helped India win its first Athletics Gold Medal at Asian Games 2026! 🥇 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Apropos observations by Justice Dutta in EC appointments If you look at the trajectory of SC judgements in matters of appointments: 1. CVC cannot be appointed by government 2. CBI Chief cannot be appointed by government 3. Director ED cannot be appointed by government 4. DGP cannot be appointed by (state) government 5. Tribunal members cannot be appointed by government 6. Election Commissioners cannot be appointed by government Of course HC and SC judges are appointed exclusively by the judiciary itself. In which other democracy is the appointing powers of a democratically elected government forced to be shared with unelected bodies like the judiciary or with people who lost the election (LOP). What is the purpose of the elaborate election if the judiciary is then to say that the elected government cannot be trusted with appointments in high places hence others must also have a say. Does it remain a democracy where the will of the people, periodically expressed, is permanently circumscribed by an unelected body? If a major law and order issue crops up, who is held responsible or accountable? The elected government or the CJI or the LOP? Yet, they both have role in the appointing process but no role in the accountability matrix! An absurd result of these SC verdicts - the SC sits in judgement over the functions performed by the very people it chose to appoint ( CBI chief; CECs and ECs till new law came into effect). On the converse, if one were to take the view the high office appointments must be made with greater consultation, then what about HC and SC judges? If a SC judge can sit in appointment of CEC (as SC ruled) then why can't PM or LOP (for that matter) sit in appointment of a Judge? However, when such logical questions are put to the SC where a reasoned response may not be plausible, the hammer of Article 142 or the conveniently flexible concept of 'Basic Structure' comes down!

मैंने दो कॉमेडियन्स का वीडियो देखा, हँसी ढूँढ़ता रहा, मसखरी दिखाई दी, सटायर ढूँढता रहा, संवेदन-शून्यता दिखायी दी. परिहास ढूँढता रहा, बदतमीज़ी दिखाई दी. एक वृद्ध महिला को कुर्सी और आदर देना अगर मज़ाक़ का विषय है, तो ईश्वर से प्रार्थना करता हूँ कि मैं आजीवन मज़ाक़ बन के जीता रहूँ और एक दिन मज़ाक़ बनके ही इस निर्मम दुनिया से चला जाऊँ. विरोध करना लोकतांत्रिक-अधिकार है, लेकिन मर्यादा से गिरना चारित्रिक-पतन है. परमात्मा मुझे वो दिन न दिखाए कि मैं अपने महान भारतवर्ष में कभी जोकर-राज देखूँ. मेरे बच्चों, जेन ज़ी के चिराग़ों, हँसने के लिए बीरबल के चुटकुले पढ़ लेना, पंचतंत्र की कहानियाँ पढ़ लेना, तेनालीराम के किस्से पढ़ लेना, लेकिन ऐसे भावना-शून्य जोकरों को अपनी मोबाइल स्क्रीन पर जगह देकर, अपने माता-पिता की परवरिश को लज्जित मत करना. जीते रहो!

Rahul Gandhi had got it spot on. Campaigning in US, UK, Europe and Colombian college campuses against BJP and PM Modi. He was even winning there. Someone has unnecessarily forced him to focus on Indian students with stunts like Jhooth ki Goonj etc. @RahulGandhi should listen to his heart and get back to what works.

End of TMC as it existed is not just the end of an era. It is the end of a mafia empire. Jut like how the Lalu empire wad ended in Bihar. Just that unlike Lalu, TMC under Mamata Banerjee had also become a national security threat.