Trunk-Based Development vs Git Flow vs GitHub Flow 🌿 Which does your team use? Trunk-Based Development Trunk-Based Development keeps development centered around a single main branch. Developers use short-lived branches or commit directly to trunk - and integrate changes frequently. It works especially well for teams practicing continuous integration and shipping small updates often. Git Flow Git Flow uses a more structured branching model with dedicated branches for ongoing development, features, releases, and hotfixes. It provides clear separation between development and production work, making it useful for teams with scheduled releases, multiple supported versions, or more formal release processes. GitHub Flow GitHub Flow is a lightweight, pull-request-driven workflow. Developers create a branch, make changes, open a pull request, review and test the work, merge it into main, and deploy. It fits teams that want a simple process while keeping main continuously deployable. Git Worktree Git Worktree allows multiple branches from the same repository to be checked out into separate directories at the same time. It is useful when you need to develop a feature, review another branch, or handle a hotfix without repeatedly stashing changes or switching branches. Choosing a Workflow Teams focused on speed and frequent integration often benefit from Trunk-Based Development. Teams with formal release cycles may prefer Git Flow. Teams wanting a simple PR-based workflow often choose GitHub Flow. For smaller teams, starting with the simplest workflow that meets current needs is usually easier to maintain. #Git #DevOps #SoftwareEngineering #DeveloperTools