I left a four year climate science degree with no idea that carbon dioxide only comprised 0.04% of earth atmosphere. I studied hard, I got top marks. Tell me. What went wrong?

No, stupid, that would be the people who are blaming the European heatwave on climate change. A single week’s worth of weather is irrelevant to long-term climate and Europe is just a small fraction of the global land area. Those are the same arguments you dolts make when a skeptic points out a hot day in the past in, say, from the U.S. in July or August 1936. How does it feel when your own tactics are used against ya?

You tit it’s proven science

The IPCC just threw most of AGW theory and potential consequences straight into the bin. Not deniers or FF fanboys, the IPCC. The racket is as good as finished.

MET OFFICE EXPOSE: A British government agency, The Met Office came under scrutiny at the end of 2024 after private investigator Ray Saunders found they were fabricating 33% of their meteorological data. They were falsely reporting data from 103 non-existent weather stations. The weather stations simply did not exist, yet they reported abnormally high temperatures. Furthermore, this data was used to bolster the climate change narrative and promote the Net Zero agenda. The fabricated data, was also included in climate models which influenced financial commitments and has drawn more than it otherwise would have from climate funding, through structures like the United Nations. Once again this sparks concerns about the integrity of schemes like international ‘climate agreements’. Net Zero is a scam. The Met is lying to the British public. brightonjournal.co.uk/invest…