They’re like little spoiled kids. She’s a 36 year old woman. She should be excited to see her kids ride a bike or learn how to read. These people are actually retarded. Under developed. They aren’t adults and missed out on the best parts of life.

Sharon Stone has urged Sydney Sweeney to "take responsibility" for her recent ad controversy. Also Sharon Stone:

The Detroit Lions are the second team in NFL history to score 30+ points in each of their first 3 games of a season while also having a negative total point differential over those games (1994 New England Patriots).

You’re being too nice. You’re worried about “disrespecting” her by fucking her too hard, spitting in her mouth, sticking 3 fingers in her asshole. She’s over here having squirting orgasms with a horse.

Girls don’t care about or understand money. You think they do but they don’t.

This claim is patently false. The “21 times” figure is fabricated, and the framing is scientifically inaccurate The claim from Adam Lane Smith (@AdamLaneSmith) contains two specific assertions: that sex gives “1 hit” of dopamine and that intense pornography gives “21 times” the dopamine from sex. Neither is supported by neuroscience. The “21 times” number doesn’t exist in any research No peer-reviewed study has ever measured dopamine release from pornography at 21 times that of sex. The figure does not appear in any neuroscience literature. It appears to be invented or badly garbled from another source. The actual quantified comparison that exists in neuroscience is between natural rewards and drugs — not between sex and porn. Natural rewards (including sex, food, social bonding) increase dopamine levels by as much as ~100% above baseline, while drugs like cocaine can spike dopamine by as much as ~1,000% — roughly a 10:1 ratio, not 21:1. Pornography is not a drug and has never been shown to produce drug-level dopamine surges. Direct measurements essentially don’t exist. Direct dopamine measurements in humans during sexual activity or pornography viewing are extremely rare. Most studies use proxies like fMRI or blood flow imaging, which cannot produce the kind of precise quantitative comparison the claim requires. The available evidence suggests dopamine levels during masturbation or porn use are “comparable to normal sexual activity,” though this too is described as plausible rather than directly measured. Dopamine is misunderstood in the claim. The tweet treats dopamine as a simple “pleasure chemical” where more = more pleasure = more addiction. This is a popular misconception. Dopamine is primarily involved in motivation, prediction, and learning — it rises during anticipation of reward, not just during pleasure itself. High dopamine release from sexual stimuli does not automatically equal addiction. The “dopamine receptor burnout” hypothesis is weak. A PET imaging study found no evidence of reduced dopamine D₂/₃ receptor availability in compulsive pornography users compared to controls — directly undermining the “receptor burnout” idea underlying the addiction framing. Some neuroimaging studies have found correlations between problematic porn use and altered reward-circuit activity, but these are associations, not proof of causation or damage.

Not to be dramatic, but this is what a 30-(at least) 45 year old woman should look like btw Stop loving your fat and cellulite, it’s bad for you

It's not so much the boomers being pricks. It's the pride they have in being pricks that gets people irritated.

I can’t have sex with him so I’m sending him psychic succubus dreams to steal his vital essence telepathically

If you’re a 25 year old woman on a plane and the man next to you starts masturbating and the flight crew won’t deal with it properly, find a Gen X woman seated nearby. We have been preparing for this moment since 1999 and we would be delighted to handle the situation. @united should be embarrassed

Netflix’s "Unabomber" movie releases today and I immediately noticed the SECOND cast listing is Shailene Woodley as FBI Agent Joanne Miller. So of course, my WOKE ALARM went off and I asked Google AI: Did they make up ANOTHER FEMALE FBI AGENT character for this? GOOGLE: "Yes. The character of Joanne Miller is entirely fictional. Shailene Woodley’s character was created as a composite fictional FBI agent and written into the classic true-crime trope of the lone, brilliant investigator BATTING INSTITUTIONAL COMPLACENCY AND SEXISM. In the film, FEMALE Agent Miller is the one who zeroes in on the linguistics of the manifesto. In real life, it was MALE FBI PROFILER JAMES R. FITZGERALD who heavily pioneered forensic linguistics in analyzing Ted Kaczynski’s writing." In other words, MORE STOLEN VALOR disguised as FEMALE EMPOWERMENT. And if they were willing to make this change, what other LIES will their movie tell? 🖕NETFLIX.

Men being obsessed with counting calories and diet and “macronutrients” and physical vanity is pretty cringe tbh You’re not a warrior or athlete. You work in IT Bros are turning being hot and ripped into a weakness

Can men be dudes again in movies? The whole whining, effeminate, useless guy who needs saved by a girl thing....who is this appealing to?

It's so refreshing to see women giving each other quality relationship advice for a change.