Game developer. Former psychologist. Future writer.

EU
Consciousness sways in an impenetrable bank of edited, orchestrated experience, in an immediate and familiar world of illusion, protecting our fragile ego from the distant and alien world of reality. We may be constantly hallucinating, but consciousness creates a point of view.
16
In fact, we can (compare), and we have been doing so for a long time. Humans are incredibly rich in comparative characteristics. But we are usually wise enough (at least in our personal lives) to look beyond the fundamental principle of economics.
40
Every utopia grows from the soil of an incomplete understanding of human nature. To justify itself, utopia encases humanity in philosophical amber, where it suffocates in all its moral beauty.
“The attempt to make heaven on earth invariably produces hell. It leads to that intolerance which is characteristic of religious wars, and to the saving of souls through the inquisition. And it is based, I believe, on a complete misunderstanding of our moral duties. Our moral as well as our intellectual duty is to help those who are in need of our help; but it cannot be our duty to make others happy, for this does not depend on us, and it would only too often mean an intrusion into the privacy of those towards whom we have such amiable intentions.” — Karl Popper
27
Alexander Bright retweeted
“People are always talking about originality, but what do they mean? As soon as we are born, the world begins to work upon us, and this goes on to the end. And, after all, what can we call our own except energy, strength, and will?” — Goethe
7
55
220
5,596
Acting out as a stress-relieving technique has been known since Homer's Iliad. And if a person can drag themselves out of bed, get dressed, go outside, pick up a brick, and lay it where needed, then they're not suffering from severe depression.
Winston Churchill fought his depression with bricks. He'd lay them for hours at his country home in Kent. He joined the bricklayers' union. And in 1921 he wrote about why it worked. It took psychology another 75 years to catch up. He called his depression the "Black Dog." It followed him for decades. His method for fighting it back was as basic as it sounds: laying brick after brick, hour after hour. Churchill spelled out his theory in a long essay for The Strand Magazine. People who think for a living, he wrote, can't fix a tired brain just by resting it. They have to use a different part of themselves. The part that moves the eyes and the hands. Woodworking, chemistry, bookbinding, bricklaying, painting. Anything that drags the body into a problem the mind can't solve by itself. Modern psychology now calls this behavioral activation. It's one of the most-studied depression treatments out there. Depression sets a behavior trap. You feel bad, so you stop doing things, and doing less means less to feel good about. Feeling worse makes you do even less. The loop tightens until you can't breathe inside it. Behavioral activation breaks the loop from the action side. You schedule the activity first, even when every part of you doesn't want to. Doing it produces small rewards: a wall gets straighter, a painting fills in, a messy room gets clean. Those small rewards slowly rewire the brain. Action comes first, and the feeling follows. Researchers at the University of Washington put this to the test in 2006. They studied 241 adults with major depression and compared three treatments: behavioral activation, regular talk therapy, and antidepressants. For the people who were most severely depressed, behavioral activation matched the drugs. It beat the talk therapy. A 2014 review of more than 1,500 patients across 26 trials backed up the result. Physical work like bricklaying does something extra on top of this. It crowds out rumination, the looping bad thoughts that grind people down during the worst stretches of depression. Bricklaying needs both hands and gives feedback brick by brick: each one is straight or crooked. After an hour you can see exactly how much wall you built. No room left for the mental chewing. The line George Mack used in his post, "depression hates a moving target," is good poetry. The science behind it is sharper. Depression hates a brain that has somewhere else to be.
1
39
Alexander Bright retweeted
“It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows.” - Epictetus
4
31
168
4,503
I think we still feel things subconsciously and put them into words more or less preconsciously, so it seems to me that we may feel a lack of freedom that we have not yet expressed, or are unable to express in words.
“We feel free because we lack the very language to articulate our unfreedom.” — Slavoj Žižek
22
I am always perplexed by the plurality of impressions from those who actually read the book, let alone those who merely sympathized.
2
25
The problem isn't the votes of the ignorant masses, but that the popular candidate wins. Popularization becomes the only winning strategy, forcing us to pin all our hope for a better future on the idea that good can be popular.
Unpopular opinion but the right to vote shouldn’t be automatic. It should require passing a basic test on economics, finance, history, and how laws and public policy actually work… Pass it, you vote. Fail it, you don’t.
3
92
After a conversation with my wife, I realized this comment needed to be expanded. There's a form of identification, let's call it self-naming, that allows one to psychologically eliminate a problematic object by "consuming" it, appropriating it symbolically, thereby drowning it in self-naming. Anxiety, which had causal power from the external world beyond the individual's control, is transformed by this absorption into "being an anxious person." Wearing this persona becomes a kind of ersatz experience of anxiety. It provides an illusory sense of control over the situation ("I am the cause of anxiety"), but deprives one of the real power to change it, since to maintain the illusion of control, one must continue to "be an anxious person," not "a person who has external causes for anxiety beyond one's control."
There is a modality of identification in which the object that was supposed to remain outside is completely absorbed to become an object-that-is-not-outside, thereby achieving the illusion of neutralizing its external influence.
1
26
The depth of our cruelty is mercifully hidden behind the veil of our inattention, for we are not given to see all the consequences of our inaction.
1
1
28
If we take a thought about a thought, a relationship about a relationship, a conclusion about a conclusion, a question about a question as something pretentious, then yes, of course. Otherwise, a person is pretentious.
25
I'm afraid there's no turning back. Progress will resurrect us only after it completely dehumanizes us, breaks us down into info-clusters, and describes us as a reproducible model. Perhaps only then, out of sentimental compassion, will the star of humanism briefly shine upon us.
We’ve medicalized sadness so aggressively that genuine grief now looks like a symptom. Sometimes you’re not depressed. Sometimes your life is just actually hard. And somehow we started calling it illness when a human heart finally told the truth.
55
There is a modality of identification in which the object that was supposed to remain outside is completely absorbed to become an object-that-is-not-outside, thereby achieving the illusion of neutralizing its external influence.
Imagine a 19-year-old scrolling TikTok. She watches a creator list five "signs you have undiagnosed anxiety." She recognizes three in herself. By the end of the week, she's describing herself as anxious to her friends. A month later, she's avoiding situations she used to handle fine. What went wrong? In a new paper by my PhD student Dasha Sandra, titled "Why mental health awareness can harm: Converging explanations for a societal problem", we argue that well-meaning mental health awareness can backfire, and we identify how. Four separate literatures (concept creep, nocebo effects, prevalence inflation, and illness self-labeling) have been circling the same problem from different angles. We show they converge on three mechanisms: 1.Awareness lowers the threshold for what counts as a disorder. 2. It trains people to scan their inner lives for symptoms and reinterpret normal distress as pathology. 3. Once someone adopts an illness identity, they behave in ways that confirm and deepen it. The evidence is wide. Learning that loneliness is harmful makes solitude feel worse. Learning that stress is harmful worsens well-being and performance. Awareness videos about fake conditions like "wind turbine syndrome" produce real headaches. Trigger warnings raise anticipatory anxiety without reducing distress. This does not mean awareness should stop. It means awareness can have unintended consequences, including manufacturing the suffering it tries to prevent. Inoculating people against these mechanisms works, and we already have evidence it does. Link to paper: michael-inzlicht.squarespace…
45
Alexander Bright retweeted
“Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point, which means, at the point of highest reality.” — C.S. Lewis
5
32
201
6,802
Alexander Bright retweeted
Ohne Zweifel wird in der Welt zuviel gefragt und geredet, ach, viel zu viel, aber das ist doch nichts weiter als das oberflächlichste Wellengekräusel über einem unergründlich tiefen Ozean des Schweigens. Horst Wolfram Geissler (30. Juni 1893 - 29. April 1983): Frag nicht zuviel
10
72
1,175
I'd like to say: freedom from illusion. But that would be a lie. Freedom from lies? But that would be an illusion. I think the answer is: illusion. Yes, the philosophical gift is the gift of illusion, and its ideal is the final, ultimate illusion.
12
An academic position and a decent citation index, if I'm not mistaken. Of course I am. In fact, it's absolutely unbearable to think that this question, both in the past and especially in our age of simulacra, has no real substance.
9
Science is reviving itself by rediscovering its subject, and psychology needs its revival more than ever. The public's interest in the psyche is now comparable only to capital's interest in its simulation. The question is how much damage will be done to reality this time.
1
1
13
Why not begin with an understanding of objectification in all its applications (art, science, religion), the objectification of the human being, and then, as a specific case, the sexual object? Any answer here would be superfluous.
Men mainly objectify women... A) to maintain power and control B) due to sexual interest Plus what's your sex?
17