The profanity in the Trump / Trudeau phone call happened during a heated exchange around dairy, according to a senior Canadian government source. The Wall Street Journal was first to report tensions reached the point of profanity.

Annual COP summits convened by the United Nations for the past 30 years serve as a financial scheme to extract trillions of dollars from gullible Western nations. The manufactured crisis sustains a perpetual state of fear and alarm about a feigned collapse of climate stability - a condition that has no basis in planetary history. This manufactured crisis has served as a tool to achieve distinct political and economic advantages. This seeks to shift decision-making power from elected national governments to unaccountable, pan-globalist institutions. The traditional democratic choices and fundamental freedoms valued in Western society are being systematically dismantled. Economic stability is being eroded as nations lose industrial wealth to nations like China and India. China now dominates the rare earth market and builds around 90% of the world's turbines and solar panels, plus components. It has expanded its coal power plants to become the greatest producer of clean coal power in history. Erasing national boundaries and centralising control makes the human world more fragmented, easier to manage, and less capable of resisting or reversing a top-down global restructure. The Net Zero transition opens up new avenues for corporate profit, allowing a global elite to influence international policy to suit their bottom lines under the guise of environmental stewardship. The narrative of a climate crisis represents a profound bid for political power and financial control. The Earth is a resilient, self-regulating biological environment, that has thrived under vastly warmer and more carbon-rich conditions than those we experience today. The true threat to contemporary society is not a changing climate, but dismantling national sovereignty, loss of economic stability and erosion of democratic freedoms in pursuit of a micromanaged, borderless world.

An economist, a chemist, and an engineer are on a deserted island... What could go wrong? Ronald Reagan explains.

Imagine a man convincing you to bet your life savings on a horse. He promises you it’s a champion. The future. Your best chance at prosperity. Then you discover he’s placed his own fortune on a different horse. And he’s the jokey on yours. Meet Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada.

What we are witnessing today is the systemic erosion of centuries of cohesive society. The loss of foundational cultural norms has opened the floodgates to top-down agendas—from climate alarmism to unchecked mass migration—eating away at the very cultural heritage preserved across generations. Beneath the banner of public welfare, a web of interconnected forces has progressively reversed the relationship between the free citizen and the state. At the apex sits the United Nations, leading this structural shift by spreading fear campaigns and centralising its authority under the banner of climate crisis. Unelected and uncoordinated with national interests, this administrative apparatus has become a global staging ground for centralised governance, using its vast network of agencies to manage populations and erode national borders. Domestically, similar bureaucratic bodies have hijacked commonplace social structures under a heavy-handed, creeping authoritarianism. Armed with 'faux authority,' these agencies now police language, values, and daily behavior—replacing natural social cohesion with state-enforced conformity. This is clear to see in the United Kingdom, France and Sweden. As the state expands, the bedrock of civilization contracts. Within a single generation, traditional marriage and family structures—once the vital sources of moral instruction, emotional security, and self-reliance—have been swiftly displaced. Left without a spiritual or moral compass, communities fracture into anomie, leaving isolated individuals disconnected and dependent. Modern cultural movements accelerate this breakdown by normalising radical social theories that strip away age-old communal ties. As these deeper bonds dissolve, human self-worth is redefined through material wealth alone, stripping society of its intrinsic values and cultivating long-term state dependency in place of the dignity of work. What remains is not merely policy disagreement, but a profound and systemic fragmentation of Western civilisation.

BREAKING: The EU is planning to require a passport to access the internet. And they want to block VPNs to enforce it. "The new age verification system cannot be bypassed via VPN." Read that again. A digital passport. For the internet. Enforced by blocking the tools that protect your privacy. This is what the trajectory looks like. > Cash banned above €10,000. > Bitcoin requires ID above €1,000. > Privacy coins banned. MiCA eliminating 90% of crypto firms. And now internet access tied to your identity. With VPN circumvention specifically blocked. Every layer of digital privacy. Being dismantled one regulation at a time. While America debates zero capital gains on Bitcoin. Europe is building a system where every click, every transaction, every website visit. Is tied to your passport. This is not consumer protection. This is digital authoritarianism. And they're not hiding it anymore.

A movement of global socialism, known as Glozism, has been designed around an ominous objective: dismantle Western capitalism, cripple its energy grids and export its industrial foundation. The shift relies on two primary mechanisms: the weaponisation of the climate crisis agenda and the facilitation of unrestricted, large-scale illegal migration into Western nations. It represents the spread of this corporate-state hybrid—a 'poor man's communism'—throughout Western political, economic and institutional elites. Backed by international bodies like the United Nations, this strategy systematically hollows out Western resilience while positioning China and the BRICS bloc to step into the power vacuum for ultimate global dominance. To achieve this, Glozism targets the foundational drivers of Western power. By forcing a rapid transition away from reliable hydrocarbon fuels—coal, oil, and natural gas—Western economies face inflated costs and energy insecurity, transferring industrial production abroad. Unchecked migration strains domestic stability, public services and national cohesion under the guise of humanitarian relief. Through top-down frameworks like ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance), DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion), and 'stakeholder capitalism', corporate governance is aligned with international policy rather than market demand or national interest. Critics label Glozism as a modern form of international technocracy, or Bolshevism, where wealth redistribution, resource management and social policy are dictated by non-elected global bureaucratic elites rather than sovereign governments. This is not a bottom-up movement. It's a fusion of the Western power elite—including dominant asset managers like BlackRock and Vanguard—with entrenched socialist ideologues and international bodies like the UN and the World Health Organization (WHO). Key figures within these organisations reinforce the strategy: UN Secretary-General António Guterres brings a legacy from the Portuguese Socialist Party, while WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus maintains deep historical ties to the Tigray People's Liberation Front, an organization with Marxist-Leninist roots. Furthermore, network pipelines like the World Economic Forum have cultivated and elevated young political figures—such as Emmanuel Macron in France and Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand—integrating them into internationalist governance models before they assumed national leadership. By leveraging climate rhetoric, social compliance mandates, and controlled migration, Glozism systematically bypasses domestic electorates. The ultimate trajectory is not social progress, but a calculated transfer of industrial capacity, economic strength, and geopolitical dominance away from the West.

Virtually all heavy industry across the West is now in chronic decline. It's all been handed to China. Manufacturing jobs are hollowed out everywhere in the West, striking at the heart of our power-intensive sectors like electric arc steel, aluminium smelting, and fertiliser production. Once-universal baseload power - abundant, dense, cheap, reliable - is largely being degraded and decommissioned in favour of the costly pipe dream of wind and solar technology. This pursuit of intermittent, rarified sunlight and wind power is the costliest social experiment in human history, estimated to cost $275 trillion to meet Net Zero. This was a PR target dreamed up to create a new pan-global society in the smouldering ashes of our once predictable lives. The supply chain for this transition of power has been handed to Beijing. China now produces roughly 90% of all photovoltaic components, refined critical minerals, and panel hardware—cementing its position as the greatest manufacturing power in history through an unprecedented transfer of Western wealth. In place of high-density power generation, more than a million wind turbines and an estimated 9 billion solar panels are now scattered across our open farmlands, hillsides, and coastal vistas. Because these sources are intermittent and unreliable, integrating them into existing power grids presents a colossal $21 trillion global infrastructure challenge. This may well go down as the single greatest transfer of public assets by elected democratic governments in world history. Without any serious consultation with their own citizens, Western governments eagerly aligned with the UN and signed onto framework agreements like the 2015 Paris Accord. This end goal of rising networks of socialism and globalism is the certain destruction of sovereignty, democracy and freedom. What began as voluntary international targets has rapidly morphed into binding domestic legislation. The resulting legacy systematically excluded taxpayers from decision-making, while elite-driven administrations power ahead. These socialist leaderships are committing billions in subsidies to unproven pet projects—such as Australia’s grandiose plan to become the world's first green hydrogen superpower. Prior to this shift, Western industrial policy prioritised dense, dispatchable energy security. Today, mostly socialistic governments lock in multi-decade decarbonisation commitments that outlast their electoral tenures by decades. Vast tracts of public and agricultural land are greenlit and bulldozed for transmission corridors, access roads, and sprawling industrial turbine arrays. It's all to serve an intangible belief system that vilifies carbon dioxide, the driver of essential energy and biological growth. The result: The most expensive household power bills in modern history, the destruction of dispatchable coal and gas capacity, and severe damage to national industrial, economic, and defensive resilience. Net Zero stands as perhaps the most diabolical act of self-inflicted harm ever visited upon democratic nations by their own leadership. Government by decree is the government of Lenin, not government by representation. Locking in 30-year subsidy contracts strips future generations of their democratic right to adjust failed policy based on real-world performance. It's a brutal, heavy-handed use of power.

President Donald Trump has told the UN General Assembly that the United States rejected all efforts to install globalist rule across the world. 'There is no global government, and while I’m president there will be no global taxes', Trump said. He also intended to block all 'global' tax proposals, such as a carbon tax initiative at the International Maritime Organisation. Trump gave an 'America first' approach on globalism, climate change, globalising international law, tech leadership, migration and the rise of multilateral institutions. He said the US would reject all efforts by international organisations like the OECD and various UN bodies, to establish unified cross-border tax frameworks and global carbon markets, since this would signal the loss of sovereignty. He said global taxation would create a supranational authority that bypassed domestic lawmakers, while proponents claimed it was necessary to prevent corporate tax avoidance and fund global climate initiatives, which Trump rejected as more globalism He characterised the International Criminal Court as an 'out-of-control', rogue institution and he urged member states to officially resign. He described those behind the court as an 'evil group of people' and he rejected any external jurisdiction over US affairs or personnel. Trump's remarks follow a significant escalation in US-ICC tensions, amid reports that his administration was preparing fresh sanctions against the court. The friction points to a fundamental dispute over universal jurisdiction: whether international courts possessed the authority to hold leaders or soldiers accountable without explicit domestic consent. Trump said there was no 'human right' to illegal immigration, but there was a right to remain a sovereign nation. He drew a stark contrast between international meddling (by agencies like UNESCO's mission) and the destructive effect mass migration was having on national cultures and their internal stability. This touched on the core tension of the UN’s Global Compact for Migration. From Trump's perspective, borders were essential for preserving national culture, economic stability and security. He said global bodies were seeking to frame migration through a lens of universal human rights and collaborative global distribution. Trump went on to rebrand the rise of artificial intelligence as 'super intelligence', asserting that the use of the word 'artificial' made intelligence sound fake... 'It's actually amazing'. Crucially, he declared that the US totally rejected any attempt to construct a globalist scheme to control artificial intelligence. Trump's speech directly challenged a statement signed just one day prior by 22 world leaders calling for global AI guardrails. Trump said the US would not stifle growth against geopolitical competition, with adversaries like China. Instead, he opted for internal oversight via the US Department of Justice.

The climate change narrative has provided the perfect moral smokescreen for an immense global power shift. We are watching the rise of globalism in real time—or rather, we are failing to see it, because no major media outlet bothers reporting it. While the world is distracted by headline conflicts in the Strait of Hormuz and the relentless war in Ukraine, global leadership is quietly changing hands. This crossroads has been ignored and watered down for decades. Few report how Western nations have systematically degraded their own economies, shuttered manufacturing base load, and divided their communities while this geopolitical trade-off takes place. Powerful, unseen interests are carving up the future of Western industrial assets, energy independence and national wealth. It is a tragic moment that threatens to reduce the West to secondary status permanently. This quandary is fed almost entirely by Western weakness, short-term greed, and a total collapse of strategic foresight. Political leadership abandoned its industrial duty of care long ago, raising the inescapable question: how did they get away with it? Western leadership hasn’t saved the planet—it has simply outsourced its wealth, power grid and supply chain security to a manufacturing hegemony led by China. This opaque transition moves power toward transnational bodies like the UN and WEF, while shifting global economic weight directly to the BRICS bloc. Combined with unmanaged demographic shifts and deindustrialisation, Western societies are left fragmented, energy-starved, and structurally vulnerable. When energy, manufacturing, and population baseline shift simultaneously, it represents the ultimate breakdown of governance and democratic accountability.

Globalism was sold with a promise of prosperity. In reality, it was the greatest redistribution of wealth in human history. Globalism meant Western factories closed, borders opened, and jobs relocated to wherever it was cheaper and convenient. The industrial worker in Vienna, the Ruhr region, or Ohio became unemployed or was pushed into low-wage service sector work. At the same time, profits ballooned for the middlemen who produce nothing. Financial conglomerates, importers, logistics giants, tech platforms, and consultants have pocketed the margin between cheap production in Asia and expensive sales in the West. The result is a super-rich global elite and a left-behind, indebted proletariat. The middle class—the backbone of every free society—was crushed. This represents the greatest surge in inequality in a century. Without globalism, China would never have risen. The West gave China everything, including its 2001 admission to the WTO, even though China lacked a true market economy or rule-of-law system. It was a voluntary technology transfer: anyone who wanted to produce in China was forced to hand over their intellectual property. The West looked the other way on forced labor, state subsidies, currency manipulation, and technology theft. Capital on a scale of trillions of dollars has been pumped directly into China. The West dismantled its own industrial base and rebuilt it in China. The West financed a totalitarian surveillance state that now uses Western money to rearm, buy up strategic ports, monopolise raw materials, and exercise leverage over us. China did not rise despite the West, but because the globalist West built it that way. Short-term profit was prioritised over national security, industrial sovereignty, and local workforce stability. A rootless, stateless elite in New York, Brussels, Berlin, and Shanghai feels at home everywhere and takes responsibility nowhere. In its wake are stranded communities, stripped of industry and upward mobility, entirely dependent on supply chains controlled by a foreign power. This was no mistake. It is how the system was designed to work.

This may well go down as the single greatest transfer of public assets by elected democratic governments in world history. Without any serious consultation with their own citizens, Western governments eagerly aligned with the UN and signed onto framework agreements like the 2015 Paris Accord. What began as voluntary international targets rapidly morphed into binding domestic legislation. The resulting legacy is the systematic exclusion of taxpayers from decision-making, while administrations power ahead, committing billions in subsidies to unproven pet projects—such as Australia’s much-hyped green hydrogen initiative. Virtually all heavy industry across the West is now in chronic decline. Manufacturing jobs are being hollowed out, striking directly at power-intensive sectors like electric arc steel, aluminium smelting, and fertiliser production. Once-abundant, cheap, and reliable hydrocarbon energy is being degraded and decommissioned in favour of weather-dependent renewables. Simultaneously, the supply chain for this transition has been handed lock, stock, and barrel to Beijing. China now produces roughly 90% of all photovoltaic components, refined critical minerals, and panel hardware—cementing its position as the greatest manufacturing power in history through an unprecedented transfer of Western wealth. In place of high-density power generation, more than a million wind turbines and an estimated 9 billion solar panels are now scattered across open farmlands, hillsides, and coastal vistas. Because these sources are intermittent and unreliable, integrating them into existing power grids presents a colossal $21 trillion global infrastructure challenge. Prior to this shift, Western industrial policy prioritised dense, dispatchable energy security. Today, governments unilaterally lock in multi-decade decarbonisation commitments that outlast their electoral tenures by decades. Vast tracts of public and agricultural land are greenlit and bulldozed for transmission corridors, access roads, and sprawling industrial turbine arrays—all to serve an intangible belief system that vilifies carbon dioxide, the very driver of essential energy and biological growth. The tangible result? Some of the most expensive household power bills in modern history, the destruction of dispatchable coal and gas capacity, and severe damage to national industrial, economic, and defensive resilience. As one outraged writer noted, Net Zero stands as perhaps the most diabolical act of self-inflicted harm ever visited upon democratic nations by their own leadership. Government by regulatory decree is not government by representation. Mandating a multi-decade economic rewiring without an explicit electoral mandate violates the fundamental social contract between the state and the citizen. Locking in 30-year subsidy contracts strips future generations of their democratic right to adjust policy based on real-world performance. If we weren’t so accustomed to being betrayed, it would be recognised for what it is: a raw, heavy-handed exercise in power at the expense of the people.

I swear, Mark Carney spent his entire life preparing for this moment. Everything he has done has brought him here, when we need him most. In history, few have made more impact, and given such hope, to so many, in so little time.

Mmmmmm. Extra touching.

We had a good thing, Canada. A quiet arrangement. You kept watch up north, didn’t make noise, didn’t screw around. We covered the heavy lifting. You backed us up, built a few ships, some icebreakers, flew the flag at NATO, pretended to be a country that gave a damn. We saluted your officers and let you slide when things got bloody. We asked for help and you sent 26,000 to places like Korea while we sent 1.1 million. We suffered more deaths than your total deployed forces and that was ok because you were nice and you had to remain focused on keeping the north defended. Now look at you. Your navy’s a joke, less combat power than a drug cartel with Zodiac boats. Your GDP’s circling the drain, and instead of fixing it, you’re too busy playing dress-up at climate conferences and pretending that TikTok diplomacy will stop a hypersonic missile. You have 3 rusty submarines in commission and a few at the Edmonton Mall plus a few small frigates. You have more generals and Admiral than working tanks. You spend less per GDP on defense than Albania or Slovakia. You won’t spend. You won’t build. You won’t fight. You have the longest arctic shoreline in the world but most of your unimpressive “icebreaker” fleet are small patrol craft that would be crushed in heavy ice. You are a Pacific Nation but couldn’t defend your selves from the Chinese fishing fleet let alone their Coast Guard or Navy. But you’ll sure as hell talk. Talk about “shared values” while you freeload off the defense umbrella we pay for. Talk about “peacekeeping” while China cuts your undersea cables and Russia maps your Arctic. Talk about how important your role is in NATO knowing full well your only authority is the billets, joint exercises and training we give you, You think this continent defends itself? You think because you’re polite and bilingual and serve maple syrup at the G7, you get a pass? You think getting angry about memes will protect you from ismalocommies already inside the gate? That someone else, USA, will show up when it gets hot in the Arctic or North Pacific? Not gonna happen because we don’t have a single icebreaker that hasn’t suffered a catastrophic loss and no longer have a fleet capable of evacuating our bases in the Pacific let alone defending your coast. You had a good thing. You could’ve been useful. You chose to be a burden. And when the day comes, and it will come, don’t expect a call back. We’re done babysitting the unarmed. You had two jobs. Two. Stop the spread of Communism by nodding along with our anti-marxist rhetoric and defending your own coast. You have failed miserably at both. And now you’re no longer even nice. You roll over to china and waive fentanyl through our border while booing the American flag and banning our products. Then when we call out the truth you start pulling on our sympathy strings with posts talking about what great allies you were in WW2 and Korea. I love and admire all you lost and all Canadians who served but that was a long time ago and I absolutely zero respect for today’s Royal Canadian “navy” or your politicians. We had a great thing going Canada and paid you trillions in sweetheart deals like NAFTA, open borders and all our best intel vis five eyes. All you had to do was be nice, not elect commies and patrol your own coast in return. You blew it.

Oh dear