World poverty has halved over the last 25 years thanks to the fall of communism and the rise of capitalism but the WEF's elites want to go backwards with ‘the Great Reset’. spectator.com.au/2020/10/dan…

Karni Guez était à la tête d'un peloton de tankistes féminines du bataillon Caracal, le matin du 7 octobre. Elle commandait 8 soldates, réparties dans un char Merkava et un véhicule d'appui blindé. Lorsque les alertes ont retenti, elle a compris que ce n'était pas un exercice, et que quelque chose d'anormalement grave avait lieu. Positionnée près de la frontière avec l'Egypte, elle reçoit l'ordre avec ses combattantes de faire mouvement vers le nord pour se rapprocher des combats. Sur la route, elles rencontrent un premier groupe de combattants du Hamas dans des pick-up qui ont franchi la frontière et se dirigent vers les kibboutzim avoisinant. Karni Guez donne l'ordre d'engager immédiatement l'ennemi, et le peloton ouvre le feu, les combats dureront près d'une heure, plus d'une vingtaine de combattants du Hamas seront éliminés, leurs véhicules et arsenal détruits, et plus important encore, la vague d'infiltration sur leur position est refoulée. Cette menace neutralisée, Guez donne l'ordre de faire mouvement vers le kibboutz H'olit. Son peloton engage alors le combat contre des unités du Hamas lourdement armées qui tentent de pénétrer dans le kibboutz, et parvient à manoeuvrer dans le même temps pour protéger des soldats blessés. Au cours de ces manoeuvres, les soldates élimineront de nombreux combattants du Hamas, par le feu de leur tank, ou en les écrasant lorsqu'ils tenteront de fuir. La menace sur H'olit neutralisée, Guez choisit de se déplacer vers le kibboutz Sufa, dont le poste militaire a été pris d'assaut par les hommes du Hamas. Alors que le réseau de communication principal est dysfonctionnel, elle prend position et engage les hommes du Hamas pour reprendre lentement le terrain. Les soldates de Karni Guez reçoivent par la suite le renfort de commandos Shayetet 13, auxquels elles procurent alors un appui feu précieux pour finalement déraciner et repousser le Hamas, au terme de plus de 6 heures de combat. Elles entament alors une opération de combat de rue, et de nettoyage maison par maison, bâtiment par bâtiment, pour secourir les civils pris au piège et leur permettre d'évacuer sains et saufs. La bataille de Sufa aura duré en tout plus de 12 heures. Ce n'est que vers 2 heures du matin, après 19 heures de combats acharnés, à bout de force et de munitions, que Karni Guez ordonne finalement le repli de son peloton vers leur camp de base. Le Leadership et le sang-froid de Karni, qui a improvisé seule, sans communications et sans ordres son plan de bataille tout au long de la journée, et la combativité, le professionnalisme et l'héroïsme de ses soldates ont sauvé les kibboutzim de H'olit et de Sufa, et concrètement toute la région de H'evel Shalom. Honneur à Karni et ses soldates, héroïnes d'Israël.

THE GOVERNMENT REALLY DID KEEP A SECRET AIRLIFT FROM THE BRITISH PUBLIC. Before anyone dismisses the current Manchester Airport allegations as a conspiracy theory, remember what we now know. The Government secretly relocated thousands of Afghans to Britain following a serious MOD data breach. The operation was kept secret under an unprecedented super-injunction for almost two years. The Government has since confirmed that RAF aircraft, charter flights and IOM charter flights were used to bring Afghans to the UK. Parliament has now investigated the operation and criticised the secrecy, governance and accountability surrounding it. So when allegations are now made about night-time flights into Manchester and other airports carrying large numbers of people, the answer should not simply be “nothing to see here.” Investigate it. If these flights are taking place, tell the public: • Where are they coming from? • Who is on board? • Who authorised them? • What immigration and security checks are being carried out? • Where are the passengers being taken? And if the allegations are false, prove it and publish the evidence, that’s all I ask. The British public has already discovered that governments can conduct major immigration and resettlement operations without the public knowing. Trust has to be earned through transparency. @ShabanaMahmood @andyburnham

We drove alongside a pro-Palestine march displaying images of Kfir, Ariel and Shiri Bibas that read: “Kidnapped on 7th October. Murdered in captivity.” The police refused to ban the march, so the least we could do was educate those taking part. It didn’t go down well.

If this was white people with anti immigration views… this would be rolling news. It would be spoke about by every left leaning politician. But it will be ignored… especially by @MayorofLondon

🚨BREAKING: The Congolese migrant who beat the Swedish off-duty policeman Christian Zedig to death in a FIFA World Cup fan zone in Copenhagen has been sentenced to 1 year in prison. He gets 1 year A family loses their man for life How is this fair?

This is Leftwing indoctrination in schools. It is, of course, illegal.

Bloody hell! … The BBC has a pay structure where white staff are paid less across almost every pay band because they are WHITE! … If this was any other racial group, they’d call it discrimination. But it’s just stupid white staff, so it’s “diversity” this is not OK

I have been reading further into Labour’s new scheme to give approved community groups the right to identify individual refugees they want brought to Britain, including people already known to them. Under the old system, these 'community sponsors' supported a refugee selected by the Government/UNHCR. Now the community group itself can nominate the individual it wants to bring here. This means groups can advocate for friends or relatives abroad to be resettled in Britain. We've gone from the government choosing who comes to these 'communities' getting to choose who comes here. Who thought this was a good idea?

The man who led Serco when it won asylum-accommodation contracts estimated at £1.9 BILLION now sits on the board of the Home Office, the department that awarded them. Rupert Soames was Serco CEO from May 2014 to December 2022. In 2019, Serco won two ten-year asylum accommodation and support contracts covering the North West and Midlands & East of England. Soames described them as “the largest contracts by value ever awarded to Serco”. In June 2026, he joined the Home Office. It now lists him as its LEAD non-executive director. The department says its board steers and scrutinises its strategy, performance and capability. Serco remains an asylum-accommodation contractor. The former contractor chief now helps scrutinise the customer. How is the Home Office managing any potential conflicts of interest on Serco-related matters? Is he excluded from those discussions? £1.9bn was Serco’s original estimated ten-year contract value, not money already spent.

I’ve been suspended at work since July following an anonymous grievance (not anonymous as the company accidentally revealed who it was) that said: “Sophie’s views are much more extreme than the perspectives of someone I’d feel comfortable working with.” My employer refused to obtain witness accounts I believe are essential to my defence and refused permission for me to contact colleagues to obtain them. I’m pursuing legal action. I also reported that my manager said he didn’t want to hire white people because they were “lazy”. Both white managers at our workplace were suspended at the same time (me being one of them) I’m deeply concerned about how this has been handled. With finding work already so difficult for young people, this has been incredibly hard. I don’t believe I should be facing this. If anyone has advice, or a shoulder to cry on, I’d really appreciate it.

Really ? Why didn’t the police just follow the shipment to its ultimate destination and arrest all those receiving the boats ? This is not a proper or sensible investigation. This report is more suspicious than the inflatable dinghies.

🚨DISGUSTING: This is Judge Tracey Lloyd-Clarke, Recorder of Cardiff. She sentenced ex-soldier Daffron Williams — a 41-year-old veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan and suffers from PTSD — to two years in prison (half to be served in custody) for Facebook posts made in the tense days after the Southport child murders. His posts referenced “civil war is here” and included anti-Islamic imagery. She acknowledged his military service, good character references, and mental health struggles… but still sent him to prison for words on the internet. The same judge has also jailed others for social media posts in the post-riot crackdown, including 24-year-old David Morgan who received 20 months for tweets involving Nazi imagery and racist content. Yet when Rees Newman — convicted of the historic rape of a girl under 14 — appeared before her for breaching his sex offender requirements, she suspended his two-month jail term, explicitly citing prison overcrowding. A veteran with PTSD goes to prison for Facebook comments warning about cultural conflict. A child rapist walks free because the jails are too full.

Angela Rayner’s new policy on ‘Empty Dwelling Management Orders’ is one of the most outrageous, authoritarian overreaches by a British government ever. It gives the state the power to confiscate private property if left unoccupied for six months. It is literally legalised theft and yet the left-wing media luvvies lapped up her party conference speech and let it slip by without so much as a whimper of protest. When people realise how pernicious Rayner’s ‘Empty Dwelling Management Orders’ are, the inevitable outcry will be too late. First and foremost, it will be the state that decides if your house is ripe for confiscation. The local council will deploy ‘Empty Homes Officers’, for which there is about to be a recruitment drive, who will spy on your property. These state snoops will visit your property, check your mail, take photos of your house and obtain your water and energy usage.  Armed with this information, like some second-rate private investigator, build a case on whether you’ve been living there.   Then when the state seizes your property and rents it out, who gets the payments? You guessed it, it goes directly to the local council. And they get to decide if they want to use the rent for repairs, building works and any health-and-safety upgrades to make the house habitable. They will then take out any money needed to cover the council's letting agent fees and property management costs. Only then, if there is anything left, will the actual owner get something.   The state will be able to confiscate your property for seven years.    Of course, the property owner will still be responsible for paying the mortgage if there is one - even if they are getting no income. The council, despite taking the rent, won’t cover the mortgage payments.  But should this lead to a default, the bank can repossess the property, so the owner will potentially lose everything. That isn’t the end of the scandal, because should the tenant, which the council found, stop paying rent, the council can’t evict them as they have full legal tenancy rights. Leaving the property owner with even fewer rights than the non-rent paying tenant.    People have complicated lives which means they may end up with an empty property - for example if an elderly parent dies, a messy divorce or a house you hoped you could one day do up.   Housing Secretary, Angela Rayner, too has a complicated housing arrangement. She divides her time across three accommodations - her Westminster one, her constituency home in Ashton-under-Lyne, and her new controversial Hove apartment (the one she didn’t pay full stamp duty on over which she had to resign).   No doubt the state won’t be looking to seize her private property.  In this Socialist nightmare we are living through, some are always more equal than others.

Foreign national students debt in the UK has gone from £93 million to £1.21 billion in under 10 years. When i saw that i knew i had to break down the data by nationality: 🧵

🚨LEAKED: A Woman in Leicester has sent me this. Her granddaughter brought it home from Orchard Mead. This is what children are being given to read. The worksheet is called “What is far right?” The questions are who Tommy Robinson is, whether the Nazis were far right, and how social media is used to encourage support. The reading beside it is a BBC write up of the Southport protests, with Hope Not Hate quoted as the authority. Page 39. Orchard Oath at the bottom. That is not history. It is a sorting exercise. Concern about illegal immigration, a knife attack, and parents who do not want criminal illegal aliens dumped on their streets gets filed next to the Nazis. A school in Leicester is teaching children that the people who object are the danger, and that an anti racism research group is the neutral voice. No equivalent sheet on grooming gangs. No sheet on the boats. No sheet on what the Southport families were actually told. It is disgusting. Parents should see exactly what is being put in front of their children.

UN spokesperson: “An internal investigation has concluded that UNRWA humanitarian workers in Gaza participated in the massacre carried out by Hamas on October 7”

Look at these Islamists in London being physically confrontational with the Met Police. Now if they were holding Union or St George’s flags, half of parliament would have condemned it by now and it would be the top BBC story for the next 48 hours.

Chaos in London as Muslims and other Hamas supporters ignore the laws and start fighting the police in an attempt to break their way into Downing Street as an act of solidarity with Hamas in Gaza. What is your reaction to this?

Charlie Ireland was supposed to meet with representatives of the Labour Party including 'The Labour Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs' to discuss farming & agriculture. They’ve cancelled on him, for the third time.

David Starkey suggests removing the whip from Theresa May at packed Tory confefence event.