Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
I couldn’t care less about whether the company gets sold, but the debate about ALPRs is certainly not over. Id bet they’re very much here to stay. Also: I’d have been happy to have participated yesterday, had Mr. Hawley seen fit to include any non-Flock, pro-ALPR voices like myself who would would have jumped at the opportunity to correct the many misstatements that went unchallenged at yesterday’s hearing, during which (for example) many regurgitated naked claims of constitutional infirmity without so much as a mention of the fact that dozens of legal challenges pushing that claim have *all* been unsuccessful in establishing even a single precedent standing for the proposition that cameras like Flock’s even implicate the Fourth Amendment.
4
3
378
I appreciate and respect your perspective, and you're welcome to write in opposition for us.
1
2
225
The problem with that conclusion is that it doesn’t understand the Transhumanist world we are in now. There is no red and blue. The last world cared about that. The new one doesn’t. Hawley should know this already since his GUARD act enables much bigger digital surveillance.
1
1
4
136
I believe the operative reaction was "Flock You!"
4
164
Who needs a "debate" to keep their oath and follow the Law. Warrantless search & seizure is a CRIME all day.
28
Can we send 535 fifth grader replacements there, that CAN READ??!! 4A is the Law.
19
I think they merely strategically retreated and wait for the next chance to ambush our freedoms. Stay vigilant. Mass surveillence (which includes Digital Age ID) is a deal breaker. I'll go against any entity supporting it even if I liked them a lot (such as Hawley and Cruz)
1
56
Get the Flock outta here.
1
3
103
there was no debate -
4
You love to see it.
46