It makes a lot of sense to me that
@localglobevc build one company per fund.
@cape's thinking here: "One of the things I'd noticed over the years is the tools, infrastructure or methods you use to start a business kept changing, and so the half-life of being a useful advisor to a founder was quite short."
There are numerous studies indicating VCs risk losing their edge over time.
This practice, at least intuitively, seems like a good way to stay grounded in the reality of entrepreneurship - close to the coal face, or "on the beach, with the surfers", instead of in your mansion in Pacific Heights, to borrow Saul's own analogy.
Makes very obvious sense during major platform shifts like AI.
Venture building is something of an art, though. Few do it well. It is not for the faint of heart.
In the full convo with Saul (see quote tweet), we also touched on the story behind starting LoveFilm, which was acquired by Amazon for $320m in 2011, advice for emerging managers, how to value contracts, fund size as strategy (and why
@phxcrt keep their funds small), and much more.
It was a fascinating convo with one of the giants of early-stage VC.