dev supply is gone burned onchain in one tx no team bag sitting there waiting to become somebody else's problem later whats trading now is whats actually in the market and from here i earn my side by building, not by sitting on a huge allocation proof: robinscan.io/tx/0xe2c904e2f6… back to work

first $SWAVE creator fees are in 0.25 so far im not treating any of it like profit its going back into: > V2 development > data + infra > product work > growing $SWAVE thats the model i want here the token should help fund the product the product should give the token a reason to exist simple enough more shipping from here

WHAT HAPPENS WITH $SWAVE NOW 100% of creator fees go back into the ecosystem: > burns > product development > token growth / distribution > infra + data and im already working on V2. SocialFi analysis, full Robinhood Chain history, deeper wallet behavior, better pattern matching and a lot more. the part im most excited about: Second Wave will stop looking at a token like it exists in isolation. it'll have the history of the chain behind the read. V2 will be open to everyone. $SWAVE holders will get deeper access + more functionality. build, build, build

Second Wave is live CA: 0xa8edcce43dfb459a3ab9f1c01e49d38020f75b3a secondwave.lol

UPD: TELEGRAM ALERT BOT IS LIVE AS WELL t.me/swavealerts_bot quick ticker checks straight from telegram > see what changed > check the current read > catch unusual activity > decide if its worth digging deeper same Second Wave logic, just faster access when youre on the move cooking more soon

SECOND WAVE IS GOING CRAZY 100+ users already. appreciate you guys, didn't expect it to move this fast. $SWAVE goes live soon CA will be posted ONLY on my X and on secondwave.lol - dont hunt for it - dont trust random contracts - dont ape anything before i post it

ALRIGHT THIS IS WILD aped $1k into $ROB at $50k mc after my tuned second wave model flagged it while it was still under migration literally 5 minutes later it started flying sold around $230k mc $1,000 → $4,651 +$3,651 this model is actually f*king strong in flips

one thing i really didn't want to do with Second Wave: fake precision. crypto tools love showing stuff like: “92.4% bullish” “high confidence” “smart money confirmed” even when the underlying data is weak as hell. if Second Wave doesnt have enough evidence, it should say exactly that. - some parts of the model are live - some are still experimental - some arent shown at all because they didnt pass the checks yet I'd rather show nothing than fake confidence.

people started using Second Wave in ways i didnt expect. some run it from the repo some only care about Early Signal some spend hours digging through token history and setups some just paste a contract and check if its even worth their time and the feedback has been way more useful than any roadmap i could write alone. thats why im keeping the repo public btw. github.com/davangrind/second… if you wanna look under the hood, break something or build on top of it, go ahead.

I JUST OPENED SECOND WAVE TO EVERYONE secondwave.lol web version is live > Early Signal > Second Wave states > contract lookup > recorded market data > live token pages repo stays public too. use whatever works better for you one request: please dont bother the octo at the bottom 🙏 keep building, new updates coming

THIS IS GETTING F*CKING RIDICULOUS i traded $500 using Second Wave setups next morning: $10,000 not every setup hits like this obviously but watching it connect early activity, wave structure and actual market behavior like this made me stop treating it like a side project web version drops today

FIRST PUMP APE = 10X SECOND PUMP APE = 100X sounds backwards, but thats exactly the point. you basically have 2 options: either enter insanely early and spend the next hours wondering if you just bought the top of a dead launch, or wait until the market starts giving you enough data to make a better decision. most traders think “early” automatically means better. it doesnt early usually means less information. you dont know if holders will stay, if buyers will come back, if volume is real, if the narrative survives or if the whole thing disappears after one candle. youre mostly buying a possibility the second move is different because by then you can actually see what changed: > who stayed and who left > which wallets came back > whether sells got absorbed > whether holder quality improved > whether social attention turned into real buyers > whether the first pump created demand or just exit liquidity thats why im building Second Wave. not to find every token at $20k mcap and pretend thats alpha. i care more about finding the moment where the market already gave you some proof, but the chart still isnt obvious to everyone else. sometimes buying 2x higher with a much better setup is cheaper than buying 10 dead coins “early”. thats the part most degens dont want to hear Second Wave is basically built around that idea: stop trying to be the first buyer try being the first buyer with a reason

EVERYONE LOOKS AT solana:Ai66LHZG9MCzg1WKdawwqduVAXpNDUuV8M3uyq5ppump AND LEARNS THE WRONG LESSON You see a chart like this and think: I JUST NEED TO FIND THE NEXT solana:Ai66LHZG9MCzg1WKdawwqduVAXpNDUuV8M3uyq5ppump EARLIER But I’m starting to think that’s the wrong game I didn’t catch solana:Ai66LHZG9MCzg1WKdawwqduVAXpNDUuV8M3uyq5ppump early. I entered around $20m mc and watched it run to around $50m And honestly that taught me something more useful than catching another launch at $100k: you don’t need day one Devs are earlier. Insiders are earlier. Bots are faster. I’d rather wait and see what survives. - did the hype die but the holders stay? - did supply get distributed? - did it survive a brutal drawdown? - who is actually holding it now? Then I ask one simple question: if I had 100% USDC right now, what would I buy? If solana:Ai66LHZG9MCzg1WKdawwqduVAXpNDUuV8M3uyq5ppump already ran 3x and solana:Ce2gx9KGXJ6C9Mp5b5x1sn9Mg87JwEbrQby4Zqo3pump is still near the bottom of its range, I’d rather rotate than marry my current bag Maybe leave a moonbag. Move on And when I can’t tell which fresh launch survives, I increasingly prefer to own the casino $PONS/$STONK type plays that benefit from all the activity anyway My strategy is becoming less "find the next 100x" And more: find what survived → buy good ranges → rotate

GM trenches hit different from here

98% OF TRADERS FINISHED DOWN and you still think you're different because you have 10 analytics tabs open? ~602k tokens launched on Pons ~9.4k graduated thats around 1.5% and graduation itself means almost nothing if the token dies right after this is the part nobody likes talking about everyone has the same strat now: > smart wallets > holder trackers > volume alerts > twitter scores > alpha groups > callers 20 dashboards showing the same candles in different colors you think having more data puts you ahead. most of the time it just makes you feel like you're ahead thats the trap market changed a lot - bots are faster - onchain data is instant - social data can be parsed - wallets can be clustered - everything can be scored - but traders still ape because: do you really think people consistently making money are trading the same signals as everyone else? thats why I'm building Second Wave not another screener telling you volume is up 40% i want to know: > who is buying > are they coming back > what did these wallets buy before > are sells getting absorbed > is holder quality improving > is X attention actually turning into buyers > did the same setup work before basically not WHAT happened WHY it might matter i already know this post wont perform as well as "5 ROBINHOOD GEMS THAT CAN 100X" good the less people care about this approach the better Second Wave was never supposed to become another public signal feed everyone apes at the same time keep the community small dont spread the alpha too much

I RAN 500+ ROBINHOOD TOKENS THROUGH SECOND WAVE not looking for what already pumped looking for what might catch the second wave what matters: > holder growth after first spike > repeat buyers + re-entry speed > quality of new wallets > twitter / sorsa score of holders > wallets that were early on previous runners > whales distributing while holder count grows > sell-side getting absorbed after big exits > real liquidity + slippage > volume / mcap without obvious fake activity > ticker presence inside alpha / DAO groups > social mentions actually converting into buyers > product + narrative quality > whether the story survives after the first pump Second Wave calls rn: robinhood:0x18e674231a58c239dc7daedcffe15ec3a24cff5c — $14.2M mcap robinhood:0x749216618ac66ea41ee4cabf5229d83d74f04586 — $423K mcap robinhood:0x91a2dae9699f0b82540b5886b0d8759c22820ba3 — $12.6M mcap no “100x guaranteed” bs. just data + pattern matching bookmark this in a few days we'll see how many second-wave calls actually hit

THIS IS PURE F*KING GOLD FOR MEMECOIN TRADERS I've spent a while listening to 2 good traders who actually know how to scan the trenches, and the interesting part wasn’t the terminal at all It was how they decide what not to trade The screen is basically one lifecycle NEW PAIRS → FINAL STRETCH → MIGRATED But each stage needs a completely different question Early on, you’re mostly trying to figure out whether the thing is even alive. Are real buys coming in? Is volume actually building? Is there enough activity for it to survive the launch? Later, raw momentum matters less Now the question becomes: why would anyone care about this coin after the first buyers are gone? One thing they kept coming back to was comparison If some narrative is already working, don’t analyze the next coin in isolation Compare it. - what was the original winner? - how big did that narrative get? - are people actually talking about this new one? - is the meme spreading outside the terminal? - is it cheap because you’re early, or cheap because nobody gives a shit? That distinction is everything. A coin at $80k with a bunch of green metrics is not automatically "undervalued" Sometimes it’s just an $80k coin nobody wants The terminal should validate the thesis, not create the thesis for you My process would be: 1. KILL THE GARBAGE Filter liquidity, holders, dead activity, distribution and obvious launch issues 2. PICK THE STAGE A fresh launch, a coin approaching migration and something trading hours after migration are three different trades 3. FIND THE NARRATIVE What are people actually paying attention to on CT, TikTok, IG? Does the idea have distribution? 4. COMPARE IT TO THE WINNER Every meme has comps. If the leading version of a narrative did $20m and this one is at $200k, that doesn’t mean it deserves $20m. But now you have a much better question: is there a reason the market could price these two closer together? 5. CHECK THE FLOW Buyers increasing? Volume accelerating? Good wallets appearing? Holders growing? People still talking about it? Now the terminal becomes useful because you’re using the numbers to test an idea you already have. My ideal funnel: 300 tokens → 12 worth watching → 3 worth researching → 1 chart worth real attention And that’s where AI makes sense too Not: @grok tell me what memecoin will 100x Let code remove obvious garbage, let models rank the messy middle, let a strong model research the weird 2-3 cases, then make the trade yourself. You need a system, not the single prompt So the actual memecoin edge is pretty simple Don’t try to find the best coin on the screen. Find the thing the market already wants before everyone agrees on what it should be worth

Here's the pack of my recent apes with a second wave $HYDX > called at 78k mc > second impulse at 680k robinhood:0xf2ed00e0558a0de8b7336c9fac001a0127422377 > called at 83k mc > second impulse at 850k robinhood:0x749216618ac66ea41ee4cabf5229d83d74f04586 > called at 201k mc > second impulse at 1.6m repo is open and anyone can use it.