Someone tell him that’s here’s a lot of patriotic British people who are ready to go and fight to secure our borders where they are being breeched. But fuck you if you think we are making sacrifices for foreign countries to fight other foreign countries

🇮🇱 Netanyahu says Jews have the non-negotiable right to the lands of Israel: " This is our homeland. It’s called Judea; that’s where Jews come from, and we’ve been attached to it for thousands of years. The entire claim remains on a fraudulent premise — that Judea is to the Jews as France is to the French or Italy is to the Italians. That premise is false.Categorically false. France is the state of French citizens. Italy is the state of Italian citizens. Israel is the state of Israeli citizens — not of Jews worldwide. Jews are not a nationality attached to a sovereign state. They are a group of people dispersed across many countries, holding many citizenships. Most Jews are not Israeli. They don't vote in Israel. They do not live under Israeli law. They owe Israel no political allegiance. Zionism survives by erasing that distinction.

Oh. My. Gosh. RFK Jr. now claims the measles “outbreak” is occurring because so many people went unvaccinated during COVID, and cites Fauci as having predicted this. This is possibly the most unbelievable thing he’s said thus far apart from Warpspeed.

Someone Wanted Me To Expose Piers Morgan: Let's 1st Understand One Thing You need to understand what Piers Morgan actually is before you understand what he does. He is not a journalist. He is not an interviewer. He is not even a personality in the way the public understands personality. He is a placement agent for narrative laundering. His entire career is a single assignment: to sit in the most visible chair available and cleanse dirty assets with the appearance of scrutiny. So What Exactly Is His Function? His tactic is simple, and it works because the audience has been trained to mistake volume for courage. He screams at people. He interrupts. He postures as the indefatigable truth-seeker who asks the "tough questions." But the spectacle is a magic trick. The real questions never get asked. The screaming is the cover for the script. The confrontation is the alibi. Nobody gets grilled on a Piers Morgan show unless the grilling serves the network's interests. And when a protected asset like Zelenskyy sits down, the "tough questions" are written by the same people who wrote Zelenskyy's talking points. Why? Because Piers Morgan has been a controlled asset for decades. His career is a latticework of editor positions at major tabloids, television networks, and media properties, each one owned by the exact financial class he claims to oppose. You do not get handed the editorship of an international tabloid at 29 years old because of talent alone. You get it because you are known to be dependable. You will run the stories you are told to run. You will kill the stories you are told to kill. And you will do it with such performative bluster that nobody notices the pattern. Morgan's recent defense of Zelenskyy is not an act of conscience. It is a scheduled perception operation, executed with all the subtlety of a knee on a neck. The rollout is coordinated interviews highlighting Zelenskyy's "feelings of betrayal," his "emotional pain" over American politics, his "lonely fight against corruption." None of it is journalism. It's an image reconstruction campaign. Here's The Tell: The framework is always emotional, never forensic. A real interviewer following the money would ask about the DTRA documents. About the biolab records. About the former Ukrainian prosecutor who was fired for investigating corruption in the energy sector. About the cargo manifests moving through Odesa. About the offshore accounts and shell companies linked to the political class in Kyiv. About the disappearance of billions in Western "aid" into private hands. A real journalist would ask about the adrenochrome logistics, the trafficking corridors, the organ brokerage networks that moved through Ukrainian territory for years. Piers Morgan asks none of it. Instead, he asks about feelings. He asks about betrayal. He lets Zelenskyy weep on camera or perform the appearance of it because emotional theater is the smoke screen. The audience responds to the crying, not the cargo. The performative vulnerability distracts from the forensic reality. And Piers knows exactly what he's doing. He has spent thirty years learning which emotional buttons to push to keep a conversation from ever becoming dangerous. What did the London media do during the Epstein disclosures? They ran the American imports and added nothing. Zero investigative energy on the British side of the network. Zero follow-up on the London banking. Zero on the properties, the tax structures, the charity fronts, the art transactions. The British press Morgan's press treated Epstein as a foreign story that happened to have a British prince attached. That omission is not an accident. It's an editorial decision made by people who knew the trail would lead home. Morgan's silence on the British side of the Epstein network is louder than any interruption he's ever performed on camera. He knows where the bodies are buried metaphorically, and in at least one case, with a specificity that would make the hair on your neck stand up. The London blackmail economy was built on exactly this kind of shared knowledge: everyone holds everyone's video, so nobody talks. We will dig more into him later. @piersmorgan