Good research takes time. Opinions are my own. Follow/RT ≠ Endorsement
Philadelphia, PA
- Tweets 2,616
- Following 840
- Followers 199
- Likes 9,648
I wrote about some of my concerns with ChatGPT's new Epic integration. While I'm proud of the field and excited for the future, when it comes to Healthcare Information Technologies - Caution is the name of the game. colelyons.com/writing/from-e…
3
310
Cole retweeted
Tibo reacting to a post saying it’ll take a miracle at DevDay to stop people from canceling Pro 20x...
These guys are putting an INSANE amount of hype behind this.
If DevDay flops after all of that, it’s going to be a disaster.
And we’re about to find out very soon.
20
3
125
5,590
I think this is a good way of describing the kind of feat the team at OAI would need to pull off today: "rabbit out of a hat"
I have theories on how it could be technologically possible, but extremely skeptical.
The generational fumble of OpenAI will be studied for years if DevDay doesn't pull a rabbit out of a hat. But the cut in limits, Astra 6.1 cancellation, compute problems, the paused IPO. It's all telling a story. Competition is good, but looks like OpenAI are holding on for life
1
75
this is a terrible fucking move by openai.
we've been dunking on anthropic for months for this exact kind of shit. the 20x plan. the "permanent raise" that was a cut.
i've been a big fan on openai, but i don't agree with this at all.
and i don't like the way they're framing it as "value per dollar" and "prices will keep dropping so you'll get more usage"
and they're doing it right when opus 5.5 is getting the best reception anthropic has had in months.
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo
20
11
418
10,683
I need a refund ASAP if this is true. Total bait and switch.
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo
2
2
423
Cole retweeted
🚨 OpenAI $200 plan now includes 2x less usage
After Opus 5.5 beat Astra and Sonnet 5.5 beat Sol, OpenAI looks like it’s hammering the third nail into its own coffin.
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo
24
10
196
6,032
Cole retweeted
You didn't run out of compute, you ran out of will. The will to pay market prices
15
5
120
5,480
This was a pretty interesting quiz and I think a good thought experiment if you haven't already thought of these questions before
1
43
Cole retweeted
SuperGrok Heavy for 300$ is the worst value for money sub at the moment.
100
23
700
38,089
