Your agent is smart. Its tools should be too. Check composio.dev

build on top of us ➡️
Composio retweeted
How time flies. I've been @Composio 8 months now building out our content engine and podcast: interviewing founders about what they're building. Season 3 starts soon and it'll be different. Every episode is one company, one department, filmed inside. Less "what do you think about AI," more what does it actually do here daily. I'll be asking questions like: -How much of your product is built by your own agent -What you automated and had to take back -What roles you stopped hiring for -What you'd do first at a slower company If you're a company in San Francisco (or Toronto;)) and you'd let a camera in, DM ME! Episode 1 is a works in progress right now;)
5
2
45
1,709
We tested 6 AI models on 30 challenging agent tasks: GPT-6 Astra, Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Sol, Pareto 26.9, DeepSeek V4 Pro, and GLM 5.3 Flash. Sol matched Opus’s score, finished faster, and cost about a quarter as much per successful task. Here’s how all 6 models compared 🧵🧵🧵
52
26
335
142,405
One takeaway: models that completed the same number of tasks could cost very different amounts. Pareto and Astra each completed 24/30 tasks, but Astra cost about 3× as much per successful task. Sol and Opus each completed 22/30 tasks, but Sol cost about a quarter as much.
1
9
1,846
Models struggled with vague, multi-step tasks like “Can you sync the support tickets?” That required using email, a spreadsheet, and Slack. Of 14 such tasks, no model completed 6. Astra and Pareto solved the other 8; Sol and Opus solved 6 each; DeepSeek solved 2.
11
1,614
Composio is the easiest way to connect Jev to Claude (Web, Desktop, Cowork, Code), ChatGPT/Codex, and any other AI that supports MCP.
8
12
80
8,919
Composio retweeted
Spend your development time on the things that differentiate your agent from the rest of the market. Let Composio handle the rest - connect your agent to over 1,500 apps for your users with one integration to @composio. Auth, tool calls, sandboxing, and more with one integration to Composio.
2
2
10
878
Composio retweeted
Atomic Agent connects 1500+ apps powered by @composio ✦ Set up with one API key ✦ Connect Gmail, Slack, Notion, GitHub and more ✦ Send emails, create tickets and manage files Available on Mac, Windows and Linux: github.com/AtomicBot-ai/atom…
11
7
38
2,898
Last week, we added over 22 new integrations to Composio, bringing the total to 1,556 apps. Use them with Claude, Codex, Hermes, OpenClaw, and more; or add them to your own agent with a few lines of code.
6
2
30
2,078
We aren't even close to running out of ways to use Composio at this point...
There's only one classifier that matters: what Mean Girls character are you based on your HackerNews comments. With @typesafeai and @ComposioDevs we can finally answer that question (in a type-safe way).
1
16
2,965
Update: We just added Jev on Composio.
10
8
98
8,897
Here's how all 6 harnesses compared on task success rate: Codex, Hermes Agent, and Command Code tied for the lead at 21/29. Claude Code was one task behind, while OpenCode and Pi Agent finished at 19/29. The spread was about 7 percentage points. Only 3 tasks produced different results across harnesses: 18 passed across the board, and 8 tasks also failed across all harnesses.
6
8
108
82,559
What about speed? Pi Agent, Codex, and Hermes were effectively tied on speed, with median task times of 99, 100, and 102 seconds. Claude Code took 201 seconds – about twice as long.
1
22
5,737
The takeaway: all six harnesses were much closer in capability than in efficiency. Success rates were similar, but median completion time varied by 2x and cost per solved task by 2.5x. With SOTA models like Astra, choosing a harness is as much about efficiency as capability.
1
35
5,059
We ran GPT-6 Astra across 6 agent harnesses (Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode, Hermes Agent, Pi Agent, Command Code) on 29 challenging agentic tasks. Most harnesses succeeded at similar rates. But when they failed, they used 3–5x as many tokens, depending on the harness. 🧵🧵🧵
104
56
749
123,446