Meditation absolutely can give you a sense of fundamental OKness, whilst the rest of your behavioural-motivation system goes more or less untouched.
You absolutely can use it to continue pursuing our society’s default consumerist-hedonist-materialist goals with more ease and less grabbiness.
You can do all this without ever examining the underlying desires, motivations, values, intents, behaviours, and ethics that originally put all the grabbiness in motion.
Doing so can be a worthwhile goal in its own right and help people live much happier lives.
That’s all great.
But to think this is the fundamental goal of Buddhadharma is drastically wide of the mark.
Then to think this is actually a *more advanced* view than what Buddhadharma is driving at represents levels of hubris rarely seen outside 21st century Bay Area culture.
The thing is, contrary to what the QT’d post below says, none of this is what the actual “advanced meditators” who dedicated their lives full time to nothing but spiritual practice for decades report (ie those who founded and have preserved the traditions).
Such people for thousands of years have reported that there are much deeper layers to practice, where one’s entire system of intent, motivation, desire, values, ethics and behavioural tendencies get utterly transformed.
It’s not just a case of continuing to live by Californian consumerist-materialist values but being less grabby-grab whilst you go about it.
It’s ultimately about having insights that fundamentally shape your entire view of what is desirable, what is valuable, what the good looks like, how you should behave, how you should treat others, what is worth wanting, what your fundamental identity is and even what life and death themselves are, as well as what lies beyond death.
There’s a reason why the Buddha didn’t just return to his awesome pleasure palace after his enlightenment and simply get back to consuming experiences but with less grabby grabness or with a “fundamental OKness” whilst he did it.
@corbindreams - I don’t mean to be disrespectful to you. You’re a talented writer and I enjoy some of your writing on meditation. Some of your descriptions of the phenomenology of meditation - including some in this post - are illuminating. But what you are describing here is absolutely not the end point of the Buddhist project(s), much less a more advanced distillation of it.