While in New York for the UN General Assembly, I joined an interfaith event hosted by the Muslim World League (MWL), led by Secretary-General Sheikh Dr. Mohammad bin Abdulkarim Al-Issa, focused on the intersection of AI, technology, faith, and tolerance. The speakers formed a mosaic across the three Abrahamic faiths, reflecting diversity within Islam, Christianity, and Judaism. Present at the event were Sunni and Shia Muslims, Orthodox and Reform Jews, Catholic and Christian clergy, and many others with different social, national, and political backgrounds. My individual conversations with attendees confirmed a wide spectrum of views and beliefs; for example, some admired NYC Mayor Mamdani and what he represents, while others loathed him and rejected the movement around him.
In addition to several other interesting sessions, Malala Yousafzai spoke about ‘gender apartheid’ in Afghanistan and the criminalization of girls’ education. Interfaith panels explored how AI can deepen religious divides while also democratizing access to religious texts and interpretive analysis. Senior UN officials and heads of multilateral organizations stressed the need to ensure that a collective push should be geared toward ensuring that artificial intelligence strengthens religious engagement, reform, tolerance, and learning, rather than accelerating the algorithmic cycles of hatred and division that dominate social media.
The most important point, and the one worth highlighting, is that this room was full of people who disagreed on many issues, especially the Israel and Palestine conflict. I spoke with several attendees who held fundamentally different views, yet hundreds of people engaged across differences with respect, compassion, and sincerity. It was a reminder that social media is not the real world. The vitriol online obscures the fact that society still has the capacity to tackle hard topics and hold difficult conversations even without alignment or agreement on every single thorny issue.
Whether it was the conservative imam who felt that Mamdani isn’t going far enough, or the Orthodox rabbi who described the real struggles and fears of his New York City community since October 7, both still chose to share the space, communicated across their differences, and recognized a shared responsibility to find common ground. That is the essence of radical pragmatism.
The future of interfaith relations, exchanges, and communication across ethnic, national, and political communities is not about glossing over differences. It is about acknowledging that some disagreements will never be fully resolved while still committing to engagement, finding middle ground, and making progress on other topics and issues where alignment is possible.
Get off social media and get out into the world. You might be pleasantly surprised.