Video on good-in-the-hood:native dropping tomorrow 👀 Going over why I’m watching it, what’s catching my attention, and where I think the opportunity could be if the Hood chain starts heating up again.
11
12
22
550
Second time now that @RobinhoodCrypto has given $Good a little nod 👀 Feels like they know exactly what they’re doing.
7
14
37
1,354
Best Altcoins to Buy for the 2026/7 Bull Run 🚀 | PEAQ, TAO, VIRTUAL + Hidden Gems nitter.net/i/broadcasts/1AKEmvQyQ…
1
1
7
601
$CASHCAT is the top cat on Robinhood Chain 🐱 But what’s the top dawg? 🐶
18
2
10
1,843
My Top 3 Robotics Plays 🤖 $PEAQ $CODEC $AUKI Robotics is going to be a huge narrative. Which one are you backing?
9
6
63
2,121
What’s the best meme coin on Robinhood right now? 👀
53
1
15
2,931
I’ll be joining @C_PrincessMedia show alongside @mcpauld as a guest 👀 Looking forward to a good conversation around crypto, the markets, and plenty more. Make sure you tune in 👇 piped.video/watch?v=qvOdtAH-…
5
2
12
4,793
$PEAQ is obviously the top dog when it comes to robotics, but what small-cap robotics plays should I be watching? 🤖 I know $CODEC looks pretty solid. What else have you guys got on your radar? 👀
18
2
74
3,110
Why PEAQ Might Be The Biggest Robotics Coin Nobody Owns 🤖 I just dropped a new video breaking down why I think $PEAQ is one of the most overlooked plays in robotics + DePIN right now. The infrastructure, ecosystem and long-term potential are seriously worth watching. Check it out 👇 piped.video/QznIqFHiygI?si=5lzU…
5
17
106
3,789
Tomorrow's livestream I’m joined by @cryptosethyt and @mcpauld to break down our different strategies and the calls we made including the What what-if-3:native meme. 🌺 3 perspectives 🌺 3 strategies 🌺 1 market Date: Tuesday, 22 September Time: 3:45 PM BST 10:45 AM EDT 7:45 AM PDT 4:45 PM CEST 6:45 PM GST Link: piped.video/live/qvOdtAH-crQ… #Bitcoin #Crypto #BearMarket
2
4
11
600
New video on $PEAQ dropping today 👀
9
8
80
2,297
Is everyone ready for the real bull market? 🚀 This time, I’m expecting to see a proper drop in BTC dominance and real capital rotation into altcoins. That’s when things get interesting.
I was wrong Not going to make excuses I deserve to be dunked on
3
2
17
1,797
$PEAQ is absolutely sending it 🚀
4
10
102
2,433
Crypto Seth retweeted
I did another video on $GOOD In The Hood Recent developments: -Spoke on Kid + Walter's X space today -KYC'd with Cyberscope -Chart consolidating for 3 weeks now -Dev hinting at a new development coming soon Catch the full $GOOD bullish breakdown: 👇 piped.video/vRpfL5p0UEc
24
30
93
2,662
Crypto Seth retweeted
Biggest tourist in the space just found his voice. 😂 Rugged his own community, rebranded his channel 10 times, now he’s calling people out like he’s been here. The irony is doing laps. Get a job, David.
20
3
27
5,266
This will be my last post on the $IF situation because I’ve said everything I need to say. First, I was a late $IF holder. Most of you were in $IF before me. I got involved around 20 days ago. If anything, I came in and pumped the bags many of you were holding. Second, the only reason a lot of people here even know about the limitations surrounding $IF and potential Tier 1 listings is because I went out of my way to speak with technical and legal advisers and conduct extensive research into the project. Without that research, plenty of people would probably still be sitting here assuming $IF had a straightforward path to exchanges like Robinhood, Binance, Kraken and others without understanding the structural issues that could stand in the way. The deeper I looked, the more issues I found. Noxa was a major part of the original infrastructure around $IF, yet the Noxa launchpad is no longer operational. The creator fees that were meant to support the ecosystem are also no longer flowing in the same way, and the burn mechanism itself was tied into Noxa infrastructure. That matters because people were talking about burns, fees and long term sustainability without fully understanding how dependent parts of that system were on Noxa. There were also questions around control of the token, liquidity, creator infrastructure and whether a community takeover actually has the level of control required to satisfy major exchange requirements. I didn’t just sit there speculating about it either. I went out of my way to identify the original creator behind the project and attempted to contact him directly to see whether there was any way he could help, provide access, clarify the situation or assist the community going forward. I was actively trying to find solutions. I looked into what could potentially be recovered, what could be changed, whether the infrastructure could be rebuilt, what control the community actually had and what limitations would remain even if everyone involved wanted to move forward. That is the part people seem to ignore. It would have been much easier for me to stay quiet, continue posting bullish content and let everyone believe everything was perfect. Instead, I shared information that went directly against the bullish narrative because people deserved to know what I was finding. My position changed because the information available to me changed. That is literally what risk management is. When I entered, I was bullish based on what I knew at the time. Once I researched deeper, spoke to advisers and identified risks I hadn’t previously understood, I adjusted accordingly. You can disagree with my decision to exit. That’s completely fine. But pretending I came into $IF early, pumped it onto everyone else and then disappeared is simply not what happened. I came in late, brought additional exposure, spent my own time researching the project, spoke to advisers, tracked down the creator, attempted to contact him, looked into possible solutions, uncovered issues most people here weren’t discussing and then shared those findings publicly. I genuinely tried to help the project before changing my position. People can take that information, do their own research and make their own decision. That’s the entire point. I’m not going to keep going back and forth over it. My position and reasoning are clear, and this is the last thing I’ll be saying about $IF.
31
5
40
5,859
Why am I seeing so many influencers trying to leech people into their communities because of the $IF situation? 😂 Maybe someone needs to make a video going through all their past rugs, pumps and dumps, and failed calls so people can actually make an informed decision about who they choose to trust. xD
12
6
30
2,198
Be careful who you listen to following the $IF situation. There are bad actors using the uncertainty to redirect your attention and capital toward their own projects and communities, while positioning themselves as the “good guys” looking out for you. Don’t fall for it. Especially when some of the loudest voices have a history of jumping from project to project and leaving communities holding the bag. Think independently. Look at the track record. Follow the receipts. Don’t let someone else’s agenda become your investment thesis.
26
9
44
4,536
$TAO, $PEAQ, $VIRTUAL. Three of the strongest plays in their respective sectors: $TAO — Decentralised AI $PEAQ — Robotics / Machine Economy infrastructure $VIRTUAL — Agentic AI infrastructure But what am I missing? What’s the best micro-cap Robotics × AI play right now? Drop your highest-conviction pick below 👇
11
3
35
3,005
Name me a better robotics crypto than $PEAQ. I’ll wait. For the machine economy, robotics and DePIN thesis, PEAQ is still the one to beat.
13
9
104
4,537