I wouldn't say zero. This is a claim you may have a difficult time sustaining. When we examine the priors involved in any abductive model, we must always ascribe a low probability, never zero probability. Starting from that position is biting off more than necessary.
"It's a miracle"
The day an amputee grows back his missing limbs, that's the day that I may consider the possibility of the Christian god being real.
Growing out an arm and growing out a uterus have an equal possibility of ZERO (0). Lol.
Sep 26, 2026 · 8:09 PM UTC
2
7
277
If P (H) = 0, then P(H/E) = 0 no matter how strong E is. This model can never be useful.
So instead of P (H) = 0, you set P(H) = e, where e is small but >0
P= Probability
H = Hypothesis
E= Evidence.
By showing that E is has zero probability, you are creating more problems.
1
1
52
Now, when we add biblical or classical theism to this model, it becomes an increasingly difficult, if not Herculean, task for you to ascribe a zero probability to miracles, given that God exists. How do we go about that? You must allow for that possibility, no matter what.
1
1
42
