The communist red army bravely fought the Nazis. They pushed them out of Eastern Europe back into Germany. Millions died in the effort. They wanted to make sure Nazis didn’t come back, so they removed or killed any Germans they found in Eastern Europe/ Central Asia. What’s a few million more? They bravely occupied Poland, finding Nazis everywhere. They were sure to round up and kill the 150k or so polish nazis. As they valiantly secured warm water ports in the Baltic, they found Latvian Nazis, Estonian Nazis, they were sure to purge them as well. In Greece, in Finland, in Persia, there they found, you guessed it, more Nazis. These Nazis were put into camps or shot. With the red army’s liberation of Central Asia they found a large number of Korean Nazis. This would not do and the 150k or so were rounded up and sent away on trucks. They highly suspected the Karachays of being Nazis as well so off with them. Treachery! The 500k Chechens and Ingush living throughout the Union were found to be traitorous Nazis! They had to go! Of course who could forget the Balkars, those Nazis! They were removed from the caucuses they called home for being such aryan worshiping freaks. And in crimea, there were some 200k tatars, living nazily. They were all rounded up and sent to the wastes of Central Asia. Half of them died but who cares they were Nazis. Then the Balkans had to be purged, tens of thousands of Nazis were found hiding in there, disguised as women and children in rural villages, the cleaver monsters that they are. Then it was discovered that Nazis were posing as farm owners in the bread basket of Ukraine. How dare they! The Soviets smartly took their crops from them, leaving millions of Nazis to starve. Bravely across the globe communists in China, Laos, Vietnam, Korea, Cuba, South America found millions of more Nazis all hiding as members of society. Brave brave people these communists saving us from those Nazi women and children.
96
412
5,408
81,616
Replying to @BAMFBasar
Fliegende Autos werden überbewertet. Wir haben das:
1
1
60
1,602
Replying to @StevenErtelt
Fucking heathen savages.
3
9
156
3,616
Hinkelried retweeted
Replying to @JeremiahDJohns
one side thinks 7 men gangraped an unconscious woman for 7 hours & that patrick clancy killed his children and the other side reads
113
806
16,500
148,551
Hinkelried retweeted
Something is happening
148
1,092
7,652
374,703
Hinkelried retweeted
Schickt dieses Video jedem, den ihr kennt, allen euren Familienmitgliedern, insbesondere den Leuten, die noch nicht AfD wählen und links sind. Das ist die Zukunft Europas ohne Remigration!
163
2,734
9,500
298,962
Hinkelried retweeted
Sind die Negeraufstände in Frankreich schon niedergeschlagen?
10
1
129
1,525
Hinkelried retweeted
Three things every man asks himself while going through TSA: 1) Is my water bottle empty? 2) Did I leave a gun in my bag? 3) Why is there a member of Boko Haram telling me to remove my belt in the interest of national security?
75
868
16,488
241,021
Les gauchistes se demandent souvent où se cachent les gens qui votent à droite et pensent ne jamais n'en côtoyer. On vous explique comment ça marche: - vous, les gauchistes, êtes absolument incapables de ne pas faire référence à la politique plus de 5 minutes dans une conversation. Nous savons tous qu'il suffit de quelques minutes de discussion pour savoir si on a à faire à un insupportable gauchiste. Les mots clés feront référence au racisme, au colonialisme, à la mysoginie, à l'homophobie, au climat, aux riches, aux inégalités.... Quand quelqu'un semble incapable de tenir une discussion de quelques minutes sans la politisier, n'importe quelle personne de droite sait instinctivement qu'elle a à faire à un zozo gauchiste - Vous parlez comme si il était évident et convenu que nous sommes 100% d'accord avec vous sur tous les sujets. Tout désaccord vous paraît inconcevable. - En cas de micro contradiction, le gauchiste lance un fort regard de réprobation et indique son malaise implicitement ou explicitement. Commence alors une suite de questions type inquisition car le gauchiste se doit de dénicher les traîtres à l'humanité. - Si la personne de droite ose contredire ouvertement un gauchiste, serait-ce même sur un détail, le gauchiste devient alors hyper agressif. Il se sent alors le droit et même le devoir de vous expliquer la vie, pourquoi votre position est honteuse et vous met au banc de l'humanité. Discuter avec des ayatollah est particulièrement désagréable. On sait qu'on ne vous fera pas changer d'avis et qu'on passera juste un mauvais moment. Sans parler du risque que vous lanciez une fatwa contre nous dans notre entreprise, groupe ou école pour "mauvaise pensée". Alors que faisons-nous? Nous vous fuyons. Si nous n'avons pas le choix, souvent, nous nous taisons. Et vous finissez par vivre dans un monde imaginaire où tout le monde pense comme vous. Ensuite, quand la droite dure finit par monter partout, vous tombez de votre chaise. Qui sont ces sauvages qui osent voter extrême-droite? D'où émergent-ils? Où sont-ils? Si vous étiez capables de tenir des discussions civilisées, vous seriez au courant depuis plusieurs années, voire décennies.
270
1,440
8,280
242,562
Was man so liest heute….. ….könnte man glatt glauben 9/11 war ein Anschlag auf Muslime.
36
93
1,976
13,614
Hinkelried retweeted
If we can’t blame Muslims for what happened 25 years ago then we can’t blame white people for what happened 200 years ago.
1,563
10,371
107,892
2,059,963
There are four plinths in London's historic Trafalgar Square. Upon the first three stand George IV, General Charles Napier, and Major-General Henry Havelock. The fourth was meant for William IV, but as of today, it's occupied by the below abomination. This isn't 'diversity,' equity,' or 'inclusion.' It's an anti-White humiliation ritual. An affront to Western Civilization.
524
1,332
10,638
181,821
Akuter Schwängerungsreiz.
30
74
1,662
36,228
Espagne : Un agriculteur a trouvé un « changement climatique » dans l'un de ses champs de blé.
931
22,118
68,415
2,628,022
Hinkelried retweeted
Also why are you cheating in the fucking shooting range you fucking gormless pleb. Smallest penises in all of Kolchia
79
57
2,353
157,311
20min.ch/story/junge-tat-bez… Diese Anklagepunkte... Wenn die Transen nicht gefilmt/aufgenommen werden wollen während sie kleine Kinder groomen, ist das halt Pech. Und wie man beim Aufstellen eines Kreuzes einen Schaden von 9000.- verursacht ist mir schleierhaft.
44
Here again is another example of pure DESERVING. She DESERVES to vote. Why? Because she was born! Kitty, when this nation was founded, voting was restricted by several metrics that were intended to exclude the incompetent. In order to vote, you had to be white, male, educated, land owning, not a felon. In other words, somebody who knows right from wrong, as proven by the fruits of your behavior. Things have changed, and not for the better. If you want to talk about "absolutely unhinged," let's talk about universal suffrage. Should women be allowed to vote? Non-whites? Felons? What about people who don't own anything and have no families and have no investment in the future? Should they be allowed to vote? Will they vote for things that are good for the rest of us? What about a million Indians that moved here yesterday? Should they be allowed to vote? What about somalians? Don't you think that they might just vote for somalians? And islam? Don't you think that would destroy the country and replace it with a Somalian colony? It should be obvious that universal suffrage is "absolutely unhinged." It's not obvious to you because it's normalized, and what's normal is also what's good in your mind (because you are a normie). But if you have any kind of intellectual ability, universal suffrage is obviously ridiculous. The old cliche is "asking wolves and sheep to vote on what's for dinner." If you want to evaluate the morality of an idea, you have to look at what it produces. What has women voting gotten us? Third world cities. Average IQ fallen by 20 points due to race mixing. Infinity third world immigration. Economy destroyed. Jobs sent overseas. Brand new houses crumbling around their owners because they're built by Mexicans for 20% of the price. Men dressing as women welcome in women's bathrooms and sport teams. College acceptance and employment based on demographic category instead of performance. A bunch of fat black retards getting paid a quarter million dollars a year to be "diversity experts" while white men sit at home dying alone with no money because no one will hire them. That's absolutely unhinged! But it happened because women are easy to manipulate. They are emotional. Their little tiktok videos make them feel cranky in their tum tums and then they go out and vote about it. They don't understand the consequences of their actions. They only understand that they are acting out their feelings. They don't even understand where their feelings are coming from! And very likely, neither do you. You only know that you DESERVE, because no one has ever told you otherwise, no matter how destructive your choices are. And that's absolutely unhinged!
This is absolutely unhinged. A horrific case involving one woman’s severe mental health crisis somehow leads to: maybe women shouldn’t vote and maybe women shouldn’t be allowed to freely interact online. That isn’t an argument. It’s collective punishment dressed up as political commentary. Imagine applying this logic to men. Every time a man commits an act of violence, should we reconsider men’s voting rights? Restrict their internet access? Of course not because we understand that one individual’s actions do not justify stripping civil liberties from an entire sex. You can debate the Lindsay Clancy case. You can disagree about culpability, psychosis, treatment, or the legal standard for insanity. But using a tragedy as an excuse to suggest women deserve fewer constitutional freedoms is not serious thinking. The 19th Amendment isn’t conditional upon women behaving in ways you approve of. Neither is our basic freedom to participate in public life.
100
536
5,230
99,841
I mentioned that my garage door was making a sound. An American immediately said, "I got a guy." He did not ask what the sound was. He did not ask what kind of door. He produced a guy on the basis of the word garage. I asked who the guy was. He said, "Just a guy." He did not have a company name. He had a first name and a phone number in his phone saved as "Mike Garage." That is the contact name. Mike Garage. As though Garage is his surname. As though there is a family. I asked how he found this guy. "My brother-in-law used him." I asked if the brother-in-law was satisfied. He thought about it. Then he said, "He's still standing." The house is still standing. That is the entire review. Inside I said: THEY DO NOT KEEP RECORDS. THEY KEEP LOYALTIES. I called Mike Garage. He answered from inside a vehicle. There was wind. He said he could come Tuesday between eleven and four. Between eleven and four. A window of five hours. In my country this would be a scandal. Here it is generous. He gave me a window at all. Some guys do not give you a window. Some guys say "Tuesday" and that is the whole appointment. He came at 1:40. He fixed it in twenty minutes. He charged me less than I expected and he did not take a card, only cash or an app I had never heard of. Before leaving he looked at my water heater, which I had not mentioned, and said, "That's gonna go." I asked when. "Couple years." I asked what I should do. He said, "I'll give you a guy." He gave me a guy. Mike Garage has a guy. The guy has a guy. There is a network beneath this country made entirely of men named after their function, and none of them advertise, and all of them are busy. Inside I said: THERE IS A SECOND NATION HERE. IT HAS NO SIGNS. IT IS ENTERED ONLY BY INTRODUCTION. I have been given four guys since. I have a guy for trees. I did not know I needed a guy for trees. I have trees now, apparently. They are my responsibility. A man named Rick told me so and then left.
1,564
5,864
83,912
5,387,752