Innovator, design thinker, team player, bumbling father, San Antonio Spurs fan, lousy photographer.

Boston
I’m nostalgic for the days when I thought AI would just end truth
1
4
Building shop furniture is my own form of recursive self improvement
2
33
There could not be a more ludicrous messenger for this argument
Last month I wrote about how we can build a positive and safe future for everyone: meta.com/thefutureisforevery… Every lab has the responsibility and incentive to move at the pace required to train its models safely, and the ability to take its own actions to ensure that happens. The reality is: - People won't want to use agents that are misaligned with them and that don't do what they ask, so labs have a strong natural incentive to make their models more aligned. There is a lot of debate about slowing progress on capabilities until alignment catches up. My view is that trust and alignment are quickly becoming the most important capabilities that will differentiate agents and models. Any lab that doesn't focus on alignment will fall behind. - Labs face significant liability if their models cause harm, so they have a strong incentive to prevent this as well. Meta delayed shipping Muse for several months to focus on safety and security. We didn't call for everyone else to do this before we would. We just did it as part of our day-to-day work because it was clearly the right thing for people and for us. I'm proud of the security foundations we've built. - Engaging independent evaluators and advisors is industry best practice. MSL already does this today in several areas because it helps produce better work. Other labs can just do this too. In general, it would be helpful for there to be a larger and more diverse ecosystem of evaluators. - Committing the significant majority of compute towards serving people rather than racing towards recursive self-improvement is one of the best ways to ensure we develop this technology safely. Meta has made this commitment and other labs can do this as well. I believe the key to building a positive future for everyone is maintaining the right balance of power. This is within our power to do.
1
25
Is anyone apologetically on team humanity?
There are two ways AI progress could go very badly and that we must avoid. First, we could lose control of the future to AI. This is unacceptable; we are unapologetically on Team Humanity, and AI must always serve people. To ensure that, we need ways to ensure that alignment and safety techniques stay ahead of progress in model capabilities. Second, we could end up in a world with too much concentration of power. If an extraordinarily powerful AI is used by one person or company to impress their worldview onto everyone else, the results could be extremely dystopian. Avoiding these two threats requires walking a narrow middle path; for example, one country could gain too much power. Another example is one lab ending up with too much power.
17
Might the match of @realDonaldTrump and the rise of AI be the worst match of president and issue in history?
Trump: "The only control or 'guardrails' that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades!"
19
What say you @sama? You in?
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training. You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
14
This is not what Apple entering a new category used to be like
Apple just unveiled its first-ever foldable iPhone. The iPhone Duo marks the biggest design change to the iPhone in nearly 20 years 📱↔
1
20
Our government’s unwillingness to address AI regulation has a reasonable probability of going down as the greatest governance failure in human history
The Senate committee responsible for commerce and technology policy has zero hearings on AI scheduled for the next 4 months. The committee's top priority is, instead, the Protect College Sports Act.
52
Dear government, maybe fucking do something?
Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.
16
Kawhi for Derozen looking like the smartest trade in history #GSG #porvida
24
Fucking insane
The 100 wealthiest Americans own more than the bottom half of the country.
14
Daniel Ostrower retweeted
When the Pentagon announced a $620 million loan last year to a startup linked to Donald Trump Jr., defense officials and the company tried to tamp down suspicions of cronyism. We found that the request came directly from the White House. propublica.org/article/donal…
142
3,326
7,078
941,148
Applaud the courage of this individual. Time for SCOTUS to put an end to this madness
Breaking News: A whistle-blower at the U.S. Postal Service said Trump officials were defying court orders with a “secretive, rushed” effort affecting voting by mail. nyti.ms/460WZa8
6
302
This is so pitiful that @jamestalarico should be reposting
HEARTFELT REQUEST. PLEASE WATCH
7
No one but some cronies want this
The Trump administration will move forward with plans to open 45,000,000 acres of national forests to road paving and logging.
30