I created @OnChessProject mostly as a demo application to experiment with EIPs that tackles UX issues. The code is based on EIP-5792 and ERC-7715. Unfortunately very few wallets support EIP-5792, @zerodev Kernel dropped support, @Alchemy Smart Accounts don't support.

May 7, 2025 · 5:47 PM UTC

3
5
231
And ERC-7715, initially proposed by @reown_ does not seem to get enough traction. @coinbase wallet gave up and went to another direction with ERC-7895.
6
2
189
Another annoyance is how no ERC-4337 provider support local development, and rely on testnets for development. Testnet is for testing, not for development. I hope Porto by @ithacaxyz helps to improve the dev experience for ERC-4337 (and EIP-7702).
1
2
141
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @dtuler @OnChessProject @zerodev @Alchemy
That's why it is so important to converge on standardization of such features. Today's hard fork addresses all those needs, Danilo?
1
1
46
No, EIP-7702 adds more capabilities, but all those other EIPs still need adoption.
2
43
Replying to @dtuler @OnChessProject @zerodev @Alchemy
@thirdweb has 5792 support - try it out playground.thirdweb.com/conn…

Account Abstraction EIP-5792 | thirdweb Playground

EIP-5792 brings a standard for abstracted actions—combine transaction batching, bundling, and paymasters with a unified smart account interface

playground.thirdweb.com
1
27