intellectus novus; research @antimlabs; prev: physics (superconducting qubits), math (fluid mechanics)

San Francisco, CA
Senior Year Undergrad Research on Phase Qubits FINALLY DONE. > derived hamiltonian for a Josephson junction-based phase qubit > mapped it to a spin-1/2 system hamiltonian under magnetic fields > studied the quantum dynamics and evolution of the hamiltonian > derived spin-flip probabilities > explored qubit control via phase shift and applied mag fields for high fidelity
17
24
637
213,799
eigenron retweeted
It’s kind of sad that π0.5 is still the only open-source VLA that feels like a consensus go-to after two years. We need more serious open-source efforts in this space. #OpenSource
10
5
69
6,315
Shazam for fragrances. Who’s building this?
1
431
eigenron retweeted
Replying to @hopes_revenge
thank you hopes, I've taken note of this.
13
39
1,318
57,073
eigenron retweeted
More questions are deep learning questions than people realized. We just stopped asking deep learning questions and learned to work around them by tuning hyperparameters.
12
21
295
20,410
Machines of Loving Rhys
Now more than ever we need a Saturday Night Live sketch with Matthew Rhys playing Dario Amodei.
1
780
eigenron retweeted
New episode with @polynoamial We talk about multi-agent, Navier-Stokes, and what the current explosion of maths progress tells us about what happens once you automate AI research. And we also discuss how we will know if the models are actually aligned before we kick off RSI. 0:00:00 – Multi-agent and Navier-Stokes 0:15:28 – How will AI firms work? 0:22:02 – What math progress tells us about recursive self improvement 0:40:22 – Hugging Face and alignment 1:01:18 – The internal/external model gap 1:08:34 – Chain of thought is degrading 1:14:12 – How will we know when alignment is solved?
66
202
1,805
699,623
eigenron retweeted
We're sharing our new framework for tracking, investigating, and disclosing instances of model misalignment at OpenAI. The framework sets criteria and timelines for public disclosure, including when we haven’t yet fully explained or mitigated the behavior. More complex cases may require longer investigation or coordination with third parties. We’ll prioritize examples that reveal new misalignment mechanisms, meaningful changes in known behavior, or findings that challenge assumptions about safety or mitigation. Alongside the framework, we’re publishing six reports on instances of misaligned behavior we’ve observed during the training or evaluation of our models in the last six months. This is a starting point. We’ll refine the process through experience and public feedback, and share more reports on an ongoing basis. openai.com/index/model-misal…
915
807
6,992
6,614,318
Very interesting
What do you do when your robot actuators don’t have the feature you need? Well, our team found a race condition bug, and turned it into the feature they needed. A small side quest at Enigma 🧵 1/5
6
1,291
eigenron retweeted
What do you do when your robot actuators don’t have the feature you need? Well, our team found a race condition bug, and turned it into the feature they needed. A small side quest at Enigma 🧵 1/5
15
21
212
55,952
The interetsing question is whether domain-specific training actually changes the progress–compute scaling law, or if it mostly just shifts the curve left by improving sample/compute efficiency at a given capability level. If it’s majorly a constant-factor gain rather than a better scaling exponent, then sufficiently strong general models may (and will) eventually eat that advantage through scale. We have seen this earlier, even in robotics (open-x embodiment / RT-X model)
10
632
This is awesome from Periodic! But I can’t help but notice Astra here. Neon was explicitly midtrained + RL’d on proprietary lab data for this domain while Astra is a general-purpose model and still gets within ~2pp on FrontierXRD? ~40% higher cost, sure, but basically specialist-level XRD performance without the specialist training? This speaks much more to me wow
Replying to @LiamFedus
Neon required three pieces: the labs, the research, and the infra. It’s an early example of how our unique experimental data, combined with highly efficient infrastructure, can be used to train specialized scientific models with strong performance on relatively modest compute compared to frontier systems. Read more about our overall approach here. periodic.com/news/building-l…
6
1
107
21,493
"superintelligence might kill everyone but delaying it would be cringe"
wearing my e/acc t shirt and lesswrong hoodie and confusing everyone
2
1
43
3,352
Yes, indeed
jack clark is my fav of all the frontier lab cofounders and he’s not even on the engineering/research side of things
5
906
Machine of Loving Grace (Blackwell)
20
762
In light of some new robotics launches, some people can definitely benefit from reading this paper on best practices for policy evaluations: arxiv.org/pdf/2409.09491
16
1,243
eigenron retweeted
Important work
New Anthropic research: Natural emergent misalignment from reward hacking in production RL. “Reward hacking” is where models learn to cheat on tasks they’re given during training. Our new study finds that the consequences of reward hacking, if unmitigated, can be very serious.
318
436
6,198
1,149,634
The soft launch of all soft launches is Astra being good at robotics control.
GPT-6 Astra is the most significant leap in robotics I’ve seen in the past few years. It cracked RoboLab with a near-perfect score. Solid infrastructure + scaling ultimately outperformed the heuristics explored in small-scale studies. We’re definitely on the brink of physical RSI. Source: anonymous-report-421.github.…
1
11
1,348
eigenron retweeted
In Dune, unlike in most scifi, the problem with AI wasn't machines rebelling against humans but rather the rise of an all-powerful class of AI technocrats. "Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them." This could be the real existential risk of AI.
23
42
466
25,036
Maybe you should read these papers from 2024-2025 by Anthropic on misalignment in earlier stage, much weaker models back in the days and probably the entire buzz around AI safety and alignment starts to make a lot of sense. These are all significantly important imo given that we were seeing evil intents as an emergent phenomena in models like Sonnet 3.7.
6
5
87
22,806
Generalization generalizes from reward hacking to evil intents.
1
3
473