LDS has paid X, probably $millions, to push all this falsity with a promotion campaign......don't buy it. They know their false doctrine, don't argue with them, don't engage them, they are trained to deceive and manipulate...they are not trained in truth.

Galatians 1:8 Is Not Tired - The Verse Mormon Apologetics Still Has to Answer Key Passage: Galatians 1:8–9 — “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.” Introduction Somebody told me Galatians 1:8 is “tired.” That is a remarkable complaint to make against a verse of Scripture. Apparently the verse has been working too many shifts. Somebody needs to give Paul a vacation, put the Holy Ghost on administrative leave, and inform God that His warning has exceeded the acceptable number of uses in Mormon discussions. The irony would be funny if the subject were not eternal. Galatians 1:8 is not tired. People are tired of having to answer it. There is a difference. A fire alarm does not become obsolete because the fellow sleeping under it is annoyed by the noise. A stop sign does not expire because you have passed it every morning for twenty years. And a biblical warning does not lose one ounce of authority because a religious system has spent nearly two centuries hearing Christians point to it. Paul did not write Galatians 1:8 for novelty. He wrote it because another gospel is damnably serious business. Then, apparently worried that some future religious salesman might pretend he missed the first warning, he repeated it in the next verse. “As we said before, so say I now again.” God did not whisper this one. And notice what Paul does not say. He does not say, “If somebody brings you a new gospel, compare personalities.” He does not say, “Ask whether the missionaries are polite.” He does not say, “Examine how wholesome their families look.” He does not say, “Count their temples, admire their charity work, inspect the shine on their shoes, and see whether they look sincere enough to trust.” Paul goes directly to doctrine. What gospel is being preached? That is the issue. And he deliberately sets the bar as high as language can set it: “though we, or an angel from heaven.” Paul places himself beneath the gospel already delivered. He places angelic messengers beneath it. He places later claims beneath it. He puts every supernatural experience, every testimony, every restored prophet, every shining being, every new book, every priesthood claim, every revelation, and every theological system beneath what God has already said. Paul does not fear the supernatural; he refuses to let the supernatural rewrite the gospel. That is why Galatians 1:8 is not merely relevant to Mormonism. It is tailor-made for testing any later movement claiming restored revelation, additional scripture, angelic involvement, new prophetic authority, or recovered gospel truth. The verse does not name Joseph Smith because Joseph Smith did not exist when Paul wrote. It does something stronger: it establishes a permanent rule before Joseph Smith arrives. The rule is simple enough for a child and sharp enough to cut through an apologetics department: if the later message produces another gospel, reject it, even if the messenger comes wrapped in supernatural credentials. That means the question is not whether Mormon apologists are tired of hearing Galatians 1:8. The question is whether Mormonism preaches the same gospel Paul preached. If it does, demonstrate it. If it does not, complaints about how often the verse has been used are just theological earplugs. 1. Paul Repeated It Because God Wanted the Warning Heard The first thing that ought to embarrass anybody calling Galatians 1:8 “overused” is that Paul himself immediately repeats it. Verse 8 says, “let him be accursed.” Verse 9 says, “As we said before, so say I now again.” Evidently repetition was not beneath apostolic dignity. Evidently Paul did not believe a warning loses force after one use. Evidently the Holy Ghost thought the danger was serious enough to drive the

For those of you who do not understand what I am doing, let me spell it out. I believe there is a serious threat on the horizon for the Christian West: the growing political alliance between godless radical Marxism and radical Islamism—two movements that disagree profoundly with one another, yet increasingly find common cause against the institutions, traditions, and moral foundations of Western Christianity. Self-proclaimed socialists are winning elections across this country. Across Europe, demographic, political, and cultural changes are placing enormous pressure on societies that have already largely abandoned their Christian foundations. They are not shy about their goals. Marx famously hated religion, and the global Jihad marches on. And meanwhile, what are Christians doing? We are fighting one another. Catholic against Protestant. Protestant against Catholic. Nicene Christian against Latter-day Saint. Endless arguments about who is sufficiently Christian, whose baptism counts, whose theology is heretical, and who is allowed to stand beneath the banner of Christ. These questions are not meaningless. Doctrine matters. Truth matters. I am a Roman Catholic because I believe Catholicism is true, and Christian unity cannot ultimately mean pretending our genuine theological disagreements do not exist. But there is a difference between disagreement and enmity. We have become so accustomed to fighting one another that we risk failing to recognize when we have common cause — and a common enemy who is growing ever stronger. That is part of why I, as a Roman Catholic, have reached out to members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I have spent time listening to them, reading the Book of Mormon with them, asking difficult questions, explaining Catholicism, praying with them, and trying to understand what they actually believe rather than what their opponents tell me they believe. Furthermore, the LDS are a natural ally to the cause of liberty — and if you cannot understand that, you do not know the first damned thing about them. But, no. I have not become a “Mormon.” But I have come to regard them as friends and fellow followers of Jesus Christ with whom I share far more than our increasingly secular culture would like either of us to admit. And I want the same attitude extended more broadly. Catholics. Orthodox. Protestants. Latter-day Saints. And everyone who sincerely confesses Jesus Christ as Lord: We need to stop treating one another as enemies. We can argue theology without hatred. We can evangelize without contempt. We can believe that another Christian tradition is profoundly mistaken without mocking the people who belong to it. Because whatever our disagreements, we should recognize that a society in which LDS are no longer free to be LDS will lead to a society where Catholics can no longer be Catholic. When Catholics are no longer free to be Catholic, it will eventually not be safe for Protestants either. And a society that drives Christianity entirely from public life will not stop to congratulate us for having won our theological arguments against one another. Christ prayed that His followers “may all be one” (John 17:21). Perhaps we should start taking that prayer seriously. I am not asking anyone to abandon doctrine. I am asking us to abandon contempt. I am not asking for theological relativism. I am asking for Christian solidarity. I am not asking Catholics to stop being Catholic, Protestants to stop being Protestant, or Latter-day Saints to stop being LDS. I am asking people who confess Christ as Lord to start acting like it. We cannot allow our disagreements to turn us into enemies while forces openly hostile to Christianity grow stronger around us. The Body of Christ has spent long enough fighting with itself. It is time to work together.

I have a hypothesis that may be totally wrong, but let me know what you think. The tension around peacemaking among Latter-day Saints may exist because there are two primary ways people are interpreting the prophet’s words: a feminine way and a masculine way. I think members (both men and women) who use the feminine model of peacemaking emphasize in-group cohesion and low conflict above all else, whereas men and women who use the masculine model emphasize the productive working out of conflict through respectful disagreement. I personally think the masculine model is better for society.

The very concept of the success is deeply immoral. If you are successful the other is loser. We shouldn’t accept it. We should prosper or suffer together. Otherwise it is satanic.

Is name-calling worth the cost of fighting the construction of a church in Fairview, Texas? dallasnews.com/opinion/comme…

To celebrate the 250th anniversary of American independence, Tokyo Tower, Rainbow Bridge, and the Tokyo Aqua Symphony will be illuminated in red, white, and blue on July 4th.

This such a straw man argument. Mormans have a different Jesus simply because they dont believe in the Trinity. Push them hard enough and they will ultimately admit to this.

Our friend @EricCMeadows had his account suspended. Can you guys take a sec and go help him out?

Bring back the charismatic gifts and make sacrament lit 🔥 like Kirtland