Hmm, I don't think "pushing" should be a concept a version control system should have. Instead, visibility (public/private/ACLs) per-revision and revision group sounds better. It fits better in @radicle's model of software sharing too.
7
1
41
4,899
Replying to @HSVSphere @radicle
Have you seen this? Any thoughts on Casey's comments? It resonated with me so much, I got a free massage from a youtube video. youtu.be/t6qL_FbLArk?t=350

Apr 28, 2026 · 12:22 PM UTC

1
3
827
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @fromdevoid @radicle
Can't watch rn, but is it related to versioning game maps and such? If so, that's closer to what I'm describing, it's like a global object versioning system which is what you'd want If it's related to criticism of git & his rejection of better solutions, I don't care. These handmade people never fix anything or make anything fundamentally better. Can you give me a better timestamp?
1
6
350
That's the timestamp that you need. I hand-picked it myself. But yeah, it is about saying that Git isn't really making things much better and discussing at high-level what a good source revision tool should look like. It was a tangent to your comment. Not meant as a direct replay.
1
1
170