The “free ‘Palestine’” people never mention this

No mainstream media coverage because it doesn’t fit the narrative.

Unfuckin real

So in year (2024 the last year of complet data ) over 9,000 blacks are murderd by blacks, in the 73 years betwwen 1877–1950 the terror lyinch years appomx 4,700 black were lyinched by whites. But the media is focused on the recnt balcks found hung framing them as lyinchings and questing the sucide rulings. All but ingoring the thousnds of balcks murder by othe blacks, Interesting I wonder why. AP invokes lynching history in Mississippi hanging death after Black man is charged with murder yahoo.com/news/us/articles/a… via @@YahooNews

AI ARMAGEDDON: WORDS VS. ACTIONS The warnings have become extraordinary. “Existential threat.” “AI could kill humanity.” “Congress must act now.” “Keep Congress in session.” Those are serious claims—and serious claims should produce serious action. So we followed the paper trail. Congress has been working on AI for years. In 2024, bipartisan House and Senate groups were already studying frontier AI, including catastrophic and “doomsday” scenarios. In 2026, Congress introduced actual frontier-risk legislation. The FRONTIER Act, AI Kill Switch Act and Secure A.I. Development Act all entered the pipeline in July. Then came the September 2026 wave of catastrophic warnings. The rhetoric accelerated dramatically. But what happened to the legislation? As of September 18: No chamber vote on the major frontier-risk bills we are tracking. No comprehensive federal frontier-risk law enacted. The House proceeded into a seven-week pre-election district period despite calls to remain in session over the alleged emergency. There has been real AI-related congressional activity—hearings, committee action, investigations and legislation addressing specific problems. That's important. But it leaves a simple question: If the threat is truly an unprecedented emergency, shouldn't the urgency be visible in the legislative record as well as the speeches? We aren't claiming to know anyone's motives. We're measuring something much simpler: Words → Bills → Committee Action → Votes → Laws So far, the words have moved considerably faster than the laws. That's the gap. And that's the part worth watching.

AI Armageddon & Congress: Where Things Stand We've been following the congressional response to increasingly dramatic warnings that advanced AI could pose catastrophic—or even existential—risks. Here's what the receipts show. Congress was already working on AI in 2024. The bipartisan House AI Task Force produced 66 findings and 89 recommendations, while the Senate's 2024 AI roadmap explicitly discussed potential “doomsday scenarios.” The 119th Congress has also done real AI-related legislating—covering security, research, deepfakes, infrastructure, workforce issues and other specific harms. Then came September 2026. Warnings from AI insiders that advanced AI could potentially kill humanity produced a sharp increase in congressional calls for urgent action, investigations and stronger safeguards. But here's the interesting part: The major frontier/catastrophic-risk bills we've been tracking—including the FRONTIER Act, AI Kill Switch Act and Secure A.I. Development Act—were introduced in July. As of September 18, 2026, none had reached a chamber vote or become law. So the preliminary finding isn't “Congress did nothing.” It's more precise: Congress has been active on AI, but the extraordinary September surge in catastrophic-risk rhetoric has not yet produced extraordinary legislative action on catastrophic-risk policy. A lot of alarm. A fair amount of legislation. Very little completed action on the specific “AI could destroy humanity” problem. We've been tracking the chain: Statements → Bills → Committee Action → Votes → Laws The question now is simple: Does the rhetoric turn into hearings, votes and laws—or does it remain mostly rhetoric? The timeline below shows the receipts from 2024 through September 2026.

AI Armageddon & Congress: where are we? The rhetoric has gone through the roof. The legislative record? More complicated. AI risk was already being studied in 2024, including potential “doomsday scenarios.” The 119th Congress has since advanced plenty of AI legislation on security, research, deepfakes, infrastructure, workforce issues and other harms. Then came the September 2026 warnings from AI insiders that advanced AI could potentially kill humanity. Congressional rhetoric surged. But the major frontier-risk bills we've been tracking—FRONTIER Act, AI Kill Switch Act, Secure A.I. Development Act—were introduced in July and, as of Sept. 18, had not reached a chamber vote or become law. So: High rhetoric. Real bill activity. Limited completed frontier-risk action. That's a measurable Rhetoric–Action Gap, not a claim about anyone's motives. The test is simple: Statements → Bills → Committees → Votes → Laws The timeline tells the story.

Something a bit different, I used to shoot these kinda events they were a lot fun the kids were really cool. piped.video/d9hBAN-bkR4?is=aAYR…

Funny when they hit record highs on Jow watch all the Dems and their lapdogs where regurgitating this. "Whether gas prices are up or down, don't blame or thank the president" "Biden is ‘obsessed’ with lowering ‘outrageous’ gas prices, but presidents don’t control prices, says Energy Secretary" Falling gas prices help Democrats, but politicians don't control energy costs : NPR

LOL Cracks me the F up men have been exploiting women and their bodies for ever but when a woman does it all the snowflakes lose their F'in minds....What happed to my body my choice when it's actully her body huh? Sydney Sweeney's racy new ad has people talking. The bigger controversy is what she's selling. yahoo.com/entertainment/cele… via @@Yahoo

I find this hilarious the Dems and the meat puppets are whining nonstop about blotched repair job of the reflecting pool. The same bunch that hasn’t made a peep about the billions of taxpayers money wasted On Newsome train to nowhere the billions of taxpayers money stolen by Somalians in Minnesota or the $34 million Obama spent on the very same project. Their hypcoricey and double standards know no bonds. Company hired for Trump’s reflecting pool makeover reportedly admits flaws in plan yahoo.com/news/politics/arti… via @@YahooNews

The Democrats and their amen chorus are having a full-blown fainting spell because Trump floated five grand for adult American citizens if Republicans take the House and Senate. Fine. Call it dumb. Call it campaign candy. It probably isn’t even legal. What is rich is watching the same crowd clutch their pearls over the deficit. Suddenly the national credit card is sacred. These are the people who treated a $13–16 trillion reparations bill like a tasteful dinner-party topic. Nobody needed a CBO score for that. Nobody asked where the money came from. That was “justice.” This is “irresponsible.” Funny how the calculator only works in one direction. One plan is a four-figure check to living citizens. The other is a fortune transferred on the theory that people who were never slaves are owed a settlement from people who never owned any. That is not history. That is a shakedown with better branding. Trump’s idea is still a bad way to run a treasury. Reparations-as-cash-for-ancestry is worse. The difference is that only one of them makes the deficit a moral emergency. President Trump offered a pricey promise in his convention speech Wednesday. Here’s what you need to know about his latest idea of direct payments to Americans. wsj.com/politics/policy/5-00… via @WSJ

Just like with the $1k child accounts launched earlier this year.

Seems "All billionaires are equal, but some billionaires are more equal than others"

If a woman kills 3 baby green sea turtles, she faces up to 3 years in prison and $150,000 in fines. If a woman strangles to death her 3 children, she can raise over $1,000,000, and other women will defend her, and cheer for her in the streets.

PSA Issue a USPS stamp honoring Dolly Parton go.ipetitions.com/PfQ5f4

Today a Massachusetts jury deadlocked on Lindsay Clancy. She does not deny wrapping exercise bands around the necks of Cora, Dawson, and Callan and killing all three. The fight is over whether she should be treated as a murderer or as a patient. Outside the courthouse, supporters in pink made the answer obvious: her. Meanwhile, on any given day, roughly 50,000 men are behind bars in this country for failing to pay child support. Not for beating a child. Not for abandoning one in a basement. For money. That is the moral hierarchy. Miss a child-support check and the state will lock you in a cage. Strangle three children and a crowd will show up to insist you are the victim. Jail for unpaid support is a blunt, often stupid instrument. Plenty of those men are broke, not defiant. Fine. Say that. What you cannot say with a straight face is that nonpayment is so grave it deserves a cell, while filicide is so complicated it deserves a rally. If the people demanding fathers be jailed over arrears are the same people insisting Clancy must not be punished for three tiny bodies, they are not defending children. They are defending a sex.