Can you explain why you are so overwhelmingly confident in this when virtually every serious philosopher who has weighed in on the subject has admitted serious uncertainty and when it's unclear what our best theories of consciousness say about digital sentience? Can you explain why virtually no eminent philosopher of mind anywhere in the world shares your brazen overconfidence?
Would you debate, say
@simondgoldstein or
@LedermanHarvey on the subject of whether AI sentience is astronomically improbable? Surely if this position is so absurd that believing it is evidence of mental dysfunction (a form of dysfunction curiously common among the leading philosophers of mind) you should have no trouble debating one of its proponents.