okay bros, this Bitget situation is getting weird the first $170M was already enough to make everyone nervous, now we’re looking at a $351.6M incident and the CEO is talking about possible DPRK-linked IP/VPN activity at this point I just wanna know how they got in I’m less interested in the panic and more interested in the actual attack path that’s where the real story is imo Waiting for that interesting fact

Sep 25, 2026 · 9:40 AM UTC

16
5
134
11,798
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @hackapreneur
I hope your deposit on this exchange wasn’t affected, because that would be really unfortunate. 😔
1
1
200
hopefully users weren’t affected
1
1
53
more replies
Replying to @hackapreneur
They are still keeping how they got in in the dark actually
1
259
yeah that’s the key detail missing
1
59
Replying to @hackapreneur
Will they ever share how someone entered?
1
168
that’s what everyone wants to know
1
54
Replying to @hackapreneur
The forensic details could be fascinating.
1
158
the forensic side is definitely interesting
57
Replying to @hackapreneur
Waiting for the actual attack chain breakdown
1
135
exactly the attack chain is the real story
48
Replying to @hackapreneur
Getting into how they got breached should be the main focus, not just the money lost.
5
Replying to @hackapreneur
Breached critical backend then spoofed tx behaviour to fool the approval process
103
Replying to @hackapreneur
How the breach started matters more than the speculation.
150
Replying to @hackapreneur
$351.6M makes the root cause even more important
143
Replying to @hackapreneur
I would like people to tell me more about this
19