Trust God in everything you do.

Philippines
For those that still don’t understand what Benghazi was all about: 🚨So here's the REAL story: Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US made Stinger Missiles that the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission. Sec State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and a Private Arms Dealer named Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our own military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile. The helicopter didn't explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in Qatar by the CIA. Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the Stand Down Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy. It was the State Dept, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would not approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.” Obama and Hillary committed TREASON! THIS is what the investigation is all about, WHY she had a Private Server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and WHY Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was the result of the YouTube video, even though everyone KNEW it was not. Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo. Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone knew Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal. So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised, as well and a Sec of State that is a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi: because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles that, if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar and then to the State Dept’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya. Forward this again and again and again until everyone reads the true story of Benghazi.
500
7,316
12,161
301,075
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
Jessica Gorman and I sat before the Judiciary Subcommittee as grieving parents whose daughters were violently killed in sanctuary Illinois. And we were told, point blank, that she and her cohorts were tired of hearing our stories. It was the fourth time the subcommittee had heard from Angel Families. Think about that. Apparently, hearing from parents whose children were violently killed had become an inconvenience. Yet there never seems to be a shortage of time for the same political talking points, ideological arguments and partisan narratives. That tells you something about priorities. Ideology and party loyalty can blind people so completely that the human consequences of the policies they defend become an annoyance. Katie was 20. She is dead. We are the ones who have to live with that every single day. And the arrogance, lack of self-reflection, wisdom and humility to acknowledge the damage these policies have caused is staggering. They don't seem tired of defending the policies. They seem tired of hearing from the people who paid the price for them.
WOW 🚨 Democrat Washington Rep Pramila Jayapal says she launched “Resistance trainings” against the Trump Admin and ICE and already has over 30,000 members These are online and in person seminars to train how to obstruct ICE, ORGANIZING PROTESTS, teach boycotting businesses, create movements, ‘local organizing’ and more I looked more into this and get training sessions are from 90 minutes to 2 hours on Zoom, with breakout groups. Also in person trainings are held. She said they’ve trained about 30,000 people across all 50 states She has a website and an online form to signup and grow their resistance How in the heck is this allowed??
30
341
873
30,518
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
Remember that time when Hillary Clinton introduced her friend George Soros and his interest to get involved in US elections? The Internet sure doesn't. Why? Because it has been wiped from existence for the most part. Turns out I found a copy of the file I had archived years ago. Be a real shame if people save and shared this widely.
418
12,078
18,566
197,842
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
Since the Obamas are trending, here’s a video of them thanking Harvey Weinstein. Don’t share this This will make Barack and Michelle Obama upset
512
12,566
21,833
331,349
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
Karoline Leavitt systematically breaks down how fake news actually gets manufactured. A reporter invents the hit, finds someone who wasn’t even there, calls another person who wasn’t there either to say “yeah that sounds right,” then runs it on the front page and literally ignores what the president actually did. "They believe they are the arbiters of the truth and doing the country a great service, but they are clearly slanted and biased against the president. I’ve seen it so many times. This is how fake news is manufactured. A hack journalist comes up with a narrative on their own that they think is true about the president or the White House. They love the palace-intrigue stories: this person is fighting with that person. About 90% of my job was batting down fake stuff. They will go find a source who has no idea what they’re talking about, was not in the room, doesn’t even work at the White House — maybe worked on the campaign as a volunteer staffer for one day. Then they say, “A source close to President Trump told us this.” Who’s your source? Because I was in the room. I’m a better source than them, and I’m telling you this did not happen. They’ll still write it. All they need is two sources: one to say that happened, another they call who says, “Yeah, that probably sounds right.” Then the story is written. You can have the White House aggressively on the record pushing back, and they’ll still print it. It’ll be on the front page of the paper the next day. That’s how things get written. They just seek a bad narrative and they’ll find anyone who helps them push that narrative. The other thing — the bias of omission is the most dangerous. You can see I get all fired up about this stuff. What you don’t see in the news. I watched CNN when I was in my job. I watched it all day, every day. I had to know what the opponent was saying. I had to be prepared. The president would sign amazing executive orders or give great speeches that they don’t even cover. They don’t even mention that the President of the United States did this or that on any given day. Don’t you think your audience deserves to know what their president is doing? They don’t think so. I’ve gotten on the phone with the leadership of all those stations and said, “Why are you not taking the president’s remarks live? Just let your audience decide how they feel about this.” “Oh well, we have more important things to cover today.”" RECKLESS.
Rapid Response 47
31
435
1,217
61,384
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
🇺🇸 WHEN NEWS BREAKS, REAL AMERICA’S VOICE WILL BE THERE. From the White House to the road with President Trump, RAV is putting cameras on the ground and bringing viewers presidential coverage as it happens. And when other media outlets need access to that footage, RAV is making its pool coverage available to them. This is the next chapter for Real America’s Voice — powered by a team that never stops and the viewers who make it possible. We are Real America’s Voice — and we’re proud of it. 🇺🇸 @JackPosobiec @nicksortor @jsolomonReports @Bannons_WarRoom @davezere @RealDrGina @stinchfield1776
93
1,456
7,218
146,138
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
When the drag queens finally make it to Palestine 😂
Made with AI
237
4,032
20,598
742,483
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
.@USAmbUN schools the remarkably clueless and highly incompetent @kaitlancollins on Fake News access: "I'm standing here talking to CNN!"
800
3,059
13,091
488,058
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
This video shows why President Trump banned corrupt news outlets from the White House. The mainstream media is the enemy of the people! I hope POTUS airs this on Trump TV because the world deserves to see how dishonest our media is towards him!
839
15,331
30,766
546,911
The hottest network right now 🔥
The only place you’ll see President Trump today is on Real America’s Voice. piped.video/live/psFwUXR0toA…
71
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
AW SHUCKS, THANKS POLITICO FOR THE SHOUT OUT! "This is hilarious...POLITICO has now written up what we have done with the camera coverage of the Pres. THE ONLY TV OUTLET SHCEDULED TO TRAVEL...IS RAV!" @JackPosobiec
75
1,324
6,322
141,008
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
🚨🚨 BREAKING: This is the police report from the mysterious drowning of Barack Obama's chef and alleged lover outside his Martha's Vineyard estate that CONFIRMS there have been 42 PREVIOUS POLICE incidents at Barack Obama's home. I told you so. It looks like the Obamas have some serious explaining to do... But wait, they have strangely been keeping out of the public eye and Michelle has been out of the country hiding with her buddies Tom Hanks and Steven Spielberg. We will continue to break the details of this case that the mainstream media won't as we learn them. Why were the police called to the Obamas' residence FORTY-TWO times? JUSTICE FOR TAFARI CAMPBELL!
228
4,566
9,543
210,618
Barack Obama – The Most Complete Product of the Long March – The Community Organizer Who Became President. He is not the villain of this story either. He is its most gifted protagonist. The son of a Kenyan economist and a Kansas anthropologist, raised partly in Indonesia and partly in Hawaii; community organizer in Chicago; president of the Harvard Law Review; Illinois state senator; U.S. senator; President of the United States at 47. The American story working exactly as advertised – and simultaneously the most complete illustration of the Gramscian pipeline ever produced. Not a contradiction. The same thing. 1. He studied and taught the Alinsky method. Not metaphorically – literally. In Chicago in the 1980s, Obama worked as a community organizer in an environment deeply shaped by Saul Alinsky’s organizing tradition. He taught workshops on the Alinsky method and learned the mechanics of organizing: identify interests, build relationships, develop leaders, acquire power, and use organization to turn local grievances into political force. He knew the manual. He taught the manual. He then applied it at national scale – which is either the most remarkable career progression in American political history or the most complete proof of concept the Long March ever produced. Probably both. 2. The rhetorical genius was real. "Yes We Can." "Hope and Change." "We are the ones we have been waiting for." The ability to speak the language of unity while practicing the politics of organization – Alinsky’s politics of conflict and organization wrapped in the aesthetics of reconciliation. The form was post-partisan. The content was the most disciplined ideological project since Reagan – except Reagan was trying to dismantle the administrative state and Obama was building it. The speeches made you feel the argument was over. The argument was just beginning. 3. The Nobel Prize, awarded eight months into his first term – for nothing yet done – is the most complete illustration of cultural hegemony in modern political history. The performance of the correct identity, the correct values, and the correct aesthetic was sufficient, before any policy, to generate the highest international recognition available. The prize was not for what he had done. It was for what he represented. Which is precisely the point – and precisely what Gramsci had theorized seventy years earlier. 4. The institutional transformation was the substance beneath the aesthetics. Eight years produced the expansion of the administrative state into every corner of American life, the installation of a generation of ideologically aligned officials throughout the federal bureaucracy, the transformation of the regulatory apparatus, the use of executive action to achieve what legislation could not. The ratchet, applied at presidential scale. A subsequent administration could change the direction but not undo the installation – because the people installed remained, in the civil service, the judiciary, the regulatory agencies, doing what they had been placed there to do. 5. He understood, better than any politician since Reagan, that politics is culture before it is policy. The campaign was a cultural event – the logo, the fonts, the rallies, the language, the sense that something larger than politics was happening. He didn’t win because of policy positions. He won because he had changed what felt possible – and what felt possible changed what people were willing to vote for. This is Gramsci applied to electoral politics: shift the cultural assumptions first, and the political victories follow as confirmation rather than cause. 6. The luxury beliefs were structural. Harvard Law. University of Chicago. Net worth approximately seventy million dollars after leaving office. Homes in Washington, Martha’s Vineyard, and Hawaii. The man of the people who became the establishment – whose policies on immigration, criminal justice, and education were most costly for the working-class communities he had organized in Chicago. And then there is the habit of describing yourself as the challenger long after you have become the establishment. The outsider rhetoric maintained from the most powerful office in the world. It is not hypocrisy exactly – it is the organizer’s grammar surviving the organizer’s promotion. The language was learned in Chicago in the 1980s and never updated, because it still worked, and because the audience it worked on never noticed the distance between the speech and the address. 7. The honest assessment: he was extraordinarily good at what he did. The question is what he did. He took the Alinsky manual, the Gramscian strategy, the Frankfurt School’s cultural framework, and synthesized them into the most electorally successful progressive project in American history. He didn’t design the long march. He was its most gifted product – and its most effective accelerant. The institutions he found captured, he left more captured. The Overton Window he found shifted, he left shifted further. What he built – or rather, what he accelerated and consolidated – did not depend on him personally. The officials installed remain. The regulatory architecture expanded. The cultural assumptions shifted. The pipeline filled with people who wanted to be him and learned, from watching him, exactly how it was done. The most complete product of the long march became its most effective teacher.
Saul Alinsky – The Community Activist Who Wrote the Manual Saul Alinsky was a Chicago community organizer who spent his life teaching slum residents how to make landlords fix the heating. He despised ideologues, mocked the New Left as posturing children, joined no party, and dedicated Rules for Radicals half-jokingly to Lucifer – the original rebel who at least got his own kingdom. He would have found today’s activists ridiculous. He would have said so loudly. And yet almost everything currently done to people who step out of line was written down by him in 1971. He is not the villain of this story. He built a toolkit for the powerless – and then the powerful picked it up. The weapon changed hands. Which is what makes the story worth telling. 1. Start with what he actually built. A toolkit for the powerless against the powerful. Not a philosophy – a set of practical instructions for people with no money, no lawyers, and no access, facing a landlord who wouldn’t repair anything or a company that wouldn’t hire them. In that context the rules are not sinister. They are what you use when you have nothing else. And they are good rules. Power is not what you have but what the enemy thinks you have. Make the enemy live up to his own rulebook – nobody can, because no institution can meet its own stated standards. Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon; there is no defense against it. Read those as a tenant in 1960s Chicago and they are simply true. 2. He was not a theorist. He was a practitioner – which makes him more immediately useful than Marcuse and more operationally precise than anyone else in the long march tradition. He didn’t describe the cultural revolution. He wrote the user manual. Twelve rules. Specific, tested, applicable by anyone with the will to use them. The problem is not the man. It is the manual – morally neutral about targets and outcomes. A tool that works against a corrupt slumlord works equally well against a journalist, a politician, or a platform that allows the wrong opinions. 3. Rule 1: Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have. The appearance of strength is as useful as strength itself – and cheaper to produce. A small group that looks large, disciplined, and coordinated will be treated as such. This is why activist groups representing tiny minorities can move governments, corporations, and institutions – because institutions respond to perceived power, not actual power. The bluff is the strategy. 4. Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. There is no defense against it. The target cannot respond to mockery with argument – argument dignifies the attack. Humor, contempt, and public embarrassment are more effective than any substantive critique because they operate below the level of rational response. This is why the left’s cultural dominance expressed itself through comedy for twenty years. Not coincidence. Strategy. The right spent the same period writing policy papers. 5. Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Never let up. The target must be kept permanently off-balance, responding to attacks rather than advancing its own agenda. Rotate the tactics but maintain the pressure relentlessly. This is why the institutional assault on any opposition figure never stops – the stories rotate, the accusations shift, the investigations multiply, but the pressure is constant. The goal is not to win any individual battle. It is to exhaust. 6. Rule 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. The most operationally important rule in the manual – and the one that outran its author most completely. Don’t attack the institution – attack the person. Make it personal, cut off the target from support networks by making association with them costly, make retreat impossible by making the target’s name synonymous with the position you are attacking. Against an institution protected by anonymity, this is the only thing that works. Against an individual protected by nothing, it is something else entirely. Personalize and polarize is a reasonable tactic for a tenant against a corporation. Applied by a corporation to one person, it is a firing squad. Ridicule is a fine weapon for the man with no lawyer; deployed by every institution simultaneously against one dissenting individual, it is the pillory. The rules assumed an asymmetry that has since reversed – and they are far more effective in the new direction than they ever were in the old one. This is cancel culture – not as a spontaneous social phenomenon but as the deliberate tactical application of a rule written in 1971. 7. The book contains one observation that admirers prefer not to discuss: Alinsky noted that the most effective organizers are those without fixed ethical commitments – willing to use whatever works, unconstrained by principle. "In war the end justifies almost any means." He framed this as realism. It is also a description of the type the strategy selects for – and produces. The movement that applies Alinsky’s rules will, over time, be led by people for whom these rules are not tactics but character. This is how you get from defending poor neighborhoods to the institutions we are currently living inside. 8. The training worked. A young community organizer in Chicago learned the method, taught it, and went on to become President of the United States. Hillary Clinton wrote her senior thesis on it. That is not an accusation – it is a measure of how good the toolkit is. What began as a manual for tenants became a career path into the highest offices in the world, and then the operating manual of the institutions themselves. 9. Alinsky died in 1972, a year after publication. He did not see the captured universities, the corporate DEI departments, the social media pile-ons, the lawfare campaigns, the advertiser boycotts against platforms that allow unauthorized speech. He would have recognized all of it. The manual worked better than even he anticipated – because he wrote it for small groups challenging large institutions, and nobody anticipated that the small groups would eventually become the large institutions, applying the manual against the individuals who challenged them. The rules do not change when the power changes. They just find new targets. Alinsky did not build a conspiracy. He built an instrument. Instruments do not remember who they were made for. It is now the institutions who run the insurgent’s playbook, while pretending they are still the tenants in the cold apartment. Every one of them speaks the language of the powerless. Every one of them has the power. And the instructions for what they do to you were written by a man who thought he was helping you.
214
879
2,669
531,719
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
Now when these people tell you what’s next, remember this
Y’all would never broadcast FAKE NEWS. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
104
757
4,271
252,241
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
Hey @cnn
CNN has their ORANGE filter in for Trump’s speech. So retarded.
147
2,129
22,905
1,013,587
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
Shabbes ❤️ That’s all you need to know about critics. Left — Lynn Yaeger, fashion editor at Vogue, who in her articles constantly criticizes Melania Trump’s appearance, style, clothing choices, bags, and shoes. Right — Melania Trump.👇🤣
3,607
15,563
79,815
1,909,496
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
Last week I delivered a speech in front of millions of people. This is my full story on my journey to get there.
8
73
1,058
6,662
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
Bianca with an important message from the White House in response to @RepMariaSalazar
412
2,440
10,140
604,383
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
I am THE AMERICAN DREAM! I went from having nothing to having it all. Dropped out of high school my senior year and got my GED. I was in and out of jail and committed crimes up until I was pregnant and homeless with my first child… My son changed my life for the better. Now, I’ve graduated with two degrees and have a successful business. I’m married with a beautiful home and another beautiful child. No more running the streets. I respect law enforcement and faithfully practice being a great American citizen. I eventually became a journalist for the people until I was fired last year.. Small thing to a giant.. I just worked hard and applied myself. No more blaming the system and the white man for my failures. Because of my changed mindset it lead me to the President of the United States! I can be anything I want to be! Who would have thought I would go from a criminal to the loudest conservative voice of Memphis.. No, I’m not monetarily rich, but rich in patriotism, love, and my faith. Thank you America! This is truly the land of opportunities! I’m here and I’m ready to serve God and you, my patriotic conservatives! It’s #MAGA or nothing!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 #Trump #TeamTrump #Memphis
525
2,187
13,254
92,621
Henrybert Tantek retweeted
🚨 WE ARE WATCHING AN EXTRAORDINARY PSYCHOLOGICAL BATTLE OVER PERCEPTION. Turn on the media and you'd think EVERYTHING is dramatically worse under President Trump. Then look at the numbers. Compared with the same stage of Biden's presidency, the figures being circulated show: INFLATION 🟦 Biden: +12.3% 🟥 Trump: +4.3% GROCERIES 🟦 Biden: +15.8% 🟥 Trump: +3.3% GAS 🟦 Biden: +69% 🟥 Trump: +12% RENT 🟦 Biden: +7.7% 🟥 Trump: +4.5% ELECTRICITY 🟦 Biden: +19.1% 🟥 Trump: +8.4% NEW & USED CARS 🟦 Biden: +23.9% 🟥 Trump: −1.2% That doesn't mean Americans aren't feeling real affordability pressure. They ARE. But during Biden's term, I REMEMBER the media making it feel like everything was fine but the opposite was felt by Americans in the real world. Today, it seems to be the opposite. People's conditions are improving but the perception is that life is worse. That's exactly why you have to separate how people feel, what they're being told, and what the underlying data actually show. We're heading toward the 2026 midterms. QUESTION EVERYTHING. CHECK THE NUMBERS YOURSELF. 🇺🇸
591
7,744
14,103
308,925