🐸 😉

$ANSEM has $PEPE vibes. Check my time line years ago in first days of Pepe…

Pray for El Salvador 🇸🇻. #BTC

Former Buffalo players Shawn Fulcher (No. 10) and Isaiah Adams (No. 3) were indicted for allegedly fixing games. The indictment alleges at least $424,000 was bet on Kent State first half -8.5 of this game. Kent State went on a 12-0 run to end the half.

1) What

Dear Ravens, please do not put the rookie kicker in a position to tie or win the game in the 4th quarter against the Steelers Thank you

Somalians are praying for Maduro

*CARVANA RISES TO HIGH OF THE DAY AFTER HOUSING ANALYST SUGGESTS, AFTER SEEING LENNAR'S RESULTS, CONSUMERS MAY HAVE TO LIVE IN CARS $CVNA $LEN

context here: Derik Queen initially had 6asts vs the Bulls on Sunday. @nbastats changed it to 5asts today, almost 48 hours later, and @DKSportsbook clawed back the winnings from Derik Queen 6+ asts tickets. my immediate questions: 1. why was this even being looked at almost 48 hours later? was there a reason to target this specific game or specific play, or does every single NBA game have their box scores re-audited 48 hours after the games have ended? 2. is there a statute of limitations on official stats? or can @nbastats retroactively edit any box score from any game at any time? 3. given the fact that @DKSportsbook relies on the official NBA stats when grading wagers, do THEY have a statute of limitations on bet grading? or can ANY of my previous NBA payouts (there aren't many) be clawed back at any time? 4. who is the primary decision maker at the NBA in regards to official stat corrections? what are the official standards & processes for situations like this? 5. why aren't stat corrections made available to the public? no one would've known Queen was stat-corrected until their money was unknowingly ripped from their wallets. 6. how many stat corrections have there been in total this season? what percentage of them involves DECREASING a player's stats? what percentage of them involves INCREASING a player's stats? 7. if the NBA is clearly open to the idea of stat-corrections, why is it impossible for bettors to get stat-corrections in their favor (or at the very least, explanations) when there are clear and obvious mistakes? 8. what happens when a live bet is made under the assumption a player has a specific number of stats, and then that number is later corrected? "Queen has 4 assists at halftime. i live-bet him at halftime for 8+ asts at +600. Queen is then stat-corrected to 3 assists right before the start of the 3rd quarter. my bet is now 100% less valuable... so thats it? im just fucked now? how is that possibly fair to the bettor? i understand the NBA has enough scandals to keep everyone busy. but, in my opinion, the way the NBA stats office has operated for the last 5 years is the biggest gambling-related story that no one talks about. its the very reason why i barely bet on the NBA anymore. to put it very simply: -- sportsbooks rely on the official stats from the NBA -- the NBA has 2 stats (assists, rebounds) that are extremely subjective, are awarded inconsistently, and (apparently) are always under heavy scrutiny for stat-corrections -- the NBA can retroactively change box scores at any time / DraftKings can retroactively claw back winnings at any time -- bettors have ZERO visibility into the list of official stat-corrections, or how the process works in general -- DraftKings is the official betting partner of the NBA 🤷‍♂️

I started tailing PointSux years ago. He’s an expert at +EV and has taken the time to personally help me out with zero financial compensation Good things happen to good people. 🐐

For sports equinox I heard @DKSportsbook @FDSportsbook @ESPNBET and @CaesarsSports will all get in an empty @Carvana vending machine and beat each other with sports equipment to see who the last one standing is.

dear noobs the point of blockchains is not transparency, and it never has been this is a psyop that early crypto people told the feds when they kept being accused of doing crime the point is quite literally consensus without central trust e.g., a bunch of computers agreeing with each other on balances without needing someone in the middle like a bank in other words, the point is public verifiability back in the day, the only way to achieve this was for everyone to see everything satoshi even says this in the bitcoin forums in 2010. that he thinks bitcoin/blockchain would be more effective if you could prove without revealing but that he can't see how to get around the double spend problem in this case well now the tech has evolved, and you can verify without exposing everything via ZK the transparency of blockchains should not be thought of as a feature except in niche cases that target performance (where the physics is in favor of transparency, i.e solana) the point of crypto and blockchains is verifiability and distributing trust, this does not require transparency anymore in the year 2025

Are we back??? @ledgerstatus

Bills are an embarrassment lol. Glad I’m a Browns fan and have no hope. #BuffaloBills

By far the best NASCAR picker out there. Thank you @RkyMtnBETS

Crypto needs real games…. @photofinishgame 💰

25 bps. We are slowly turning the money printer on, not water hose style like Donald would like

Ethereum literally has the #1 DEX of all time, doing 36% of all blockchain revenue, more Bitcoin spot vol than Coinbase & Bybit And the foundation is still using a CEX to dump their ETH I cannot even express how fucking retarded these people are

Dirty money through “clean” water.