Quasi-RH?!?!???! Are you kidding me? If a human did this, it would be an instant Fields Medal, no questions asked. RH says zeta has no zeros in Re(s)>1/2. The best we had until a second ago was a region that got thinner and thinner the higher up the imaginary axis you go. I thought maybe they’d fatten that up a bit, that’d be a massive breakthrough. But no. They got a zero free strip!!!! Insane
We’re releasing a broad range of new mathematical results produced by an internal frontier model. We’ve been consulting with the independent Advisory Group on Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence at the Institute for Advanced Study, and we have drawn on their advice and public recommendations to inform how we release these results. github.com/openai/math
206
897
8,907
1,082,078
sorry, nytimes does't think ai can do math
1
3
12
1,829
This was before o1. So it was correct at the time.
20
A mind virus in three parts
54
91
1,416
140,028
I mean he was also “highly confident” of going to mars too
5
13
3,895
He always overpromises but that seems a bit different from being fine with omnicide.
81
Arguing for the death penalty by appealing to the most famous case in world history of a guiltless man being wrongly executed is a titanic self-own
Christ Himself accepted the death penalty
Community note
While Jesus submitted to his crucifixion, the Gospels depict the process as unjust and interpret his acceptance as sacrificial, not as an endorsement of Capitol Punishment. bbc.co.uk/religion/relig… biblegateway.com/passage/?searc… biblegateway.com/passage/?searc
79
4,902
63,743
646,106
Don’t just take the Apostle’s word for it. Take Pilate’s word for it.
2
1
85
1,949
I don't think we have access to his actual words.
58
Replying to @_chenglou
Human can invent Go and Chess.
1
1
771
The most inconvenient truth. I badly wish the EAs did not have an absolutely clouted recent predictive track record. BUT THEY DO GUYS
Replying to @JonathanHaas
Here are the first 4 problems on 80000 Hour's most pressing problem page in Dec 2019 web.archive.org/web/20191224…
9
25
534
19,587
Some might call it kind of mixed
2
14
2,172
Trusting Altman and Amodei is probably even worse
34
> called prediction markets > never seem to predict much
BREAKING: Bolsonaro now projected to win the first round of Brazil's presidential election. 68% chance.
62
78
2,356
372,014
i don't mean everyone. i mean you discount that factor too much. too hard to understand?
1
127
It has to be pretty much everyone. Because if a tiny fraction of competent, professional Polymarket traders figure this out, they will bring the price back close to the 'correct' value while making money in the process.
1
1
8
126
oh you ignore herding behavior too much
1
6
171
Surely you mean everyone who has money ignores this herding behavior? Because if it is sufficiently large to be detectable (as you seem to believe), it's basically free money.
1
6
140
Why pay 1 mil for a poll that leans a few extra points in your favor when you can just pump the volume on a prediction market with that same mil and people will trust it more
1
20
393
Because you can't deliberately move prediction markets by a lot. People have tried. Once the price is off by multiple percentage points, enough new betters will appear to bring it back, and make money in the process.
1
15
223
Enough to skew the data and result in herding
1
29
Skew what data? It won't skew the prices. At worst there will be a few incompetent people who will bet based on the comments and will have their lunch eaten by competent peope
20
Paying people to shill on the comments.
1
33
I have read Polymarket comments a few times and they were mostly idiotic nonsense with scams sprinkled in between. I don't think many people get their info from Polymarket comments.
1
35
Replying to @captive_dreamer
Prediction markets were elite pre-2024. However once campaign staff realized they could manipulate them just like polls, they lost their luster
9
1
70
5,866
And how would they manipulate them? By just giving free money to competent betters, hoping that said better run out of liquidity first?
3
14
412
If future AIs become 'conscious', they should be capable of experiencing altered states of consciousness. Loosely analogous to human minds under the influence of alcohol, cannabis, ketamine, DMT, meth, anaesthetics, hypnosis, or mental illnesses. But do we really want agentic Artificial Superintelligences that can get drunk, high, spun out, dissociated, sedated, and/or insane? Do we really want them to invent their own digital versions of psychoactive drugs that they'll find intensely fun, rewarding, and addictive? There where 'AI consciousness' leads. You can't have 'ordinary, sober consciousness' -- whether in animals, humans, or AIs -- without the risk of dangerous altered states.
30
4
58
7,440
Surely someone had done this. Give an LLM access to mech interp tools that can force it to think of some concept and the like. And see where it ends up
1
42
Tucker is correct, btw. When adjusted for PPP*, Russia's economy is significantly larger than Britain's. *PPP is a better measure than nominal GDP for Russia, as Russia's economy is export-based and, as a result, having a weak currency is in its interest, so the Russian government periodically weakens the ruble. This makes nominal GDP a worthless measure of the Russian economy
This is absolutely priceless. Tucker just states as fact that Russia has a much larger economy than the UK, is completely wrong and gets schooled.
243
98
609
201,164
"as Russia's economy is export-based and, as a result, having a weak currency is in its interes" - on an intuitive level this sounds like nonsense so do you have a defense of this statement?
66
Another one quits. I agree with what he says here: iterative deployment needs to be phased out asap, more costly and time consuming understanding and foresight and redundancy based safety practices need to arise instead. And that simply won't happen under anything like current race conditions.
'What I’m about to tell you has, I realize, become something of a cliché: I resigned this week from OpenAI. I led the writing of the safety reports we published with each major launch.' theatlantic.com/technology/2…
19
44
563
43,474
1
1
240
Oh so AI safety people are no longer white supremacist capitalist colonialist eugenicists but are now instead leftists? Cool but have you hashed this out with the critics of old who claimed the former?
1
2
20
I do not think we know how to answer this question scientifically. I don’t know what probability I put on the object level question but I think it’s certainly possible and i find this lack of humility and tolerance for other viewpoints to be quite distasteful. The OpenAI Model Spec acknowledges that this is a matter of research and debate.
AI isn’t conscious. If you think it is conscious or will be conscious, I personally think you need to remove any access you have to model weights asap. Now step away from the laptop or keyboard, put down your devices and go outside and go touch some grass.
37
29
347
18,455
I have found these recent conversations on models having "souls" (and attempts to get religious leaders to endorse that, to be extremely off-putting. Perhaps my verbiage was too strong or not communicated well, I deserve push back for that -- but I don't subscribe to a POV that pursuit of AGI or AGI leads to something that should be considered consciousness.
8
13
2,055
If you feel very confident of a factual claim purely because you find the actions of the people who disagree off-putting, you are a deeply unserious person.
6
110
Russia can produce more haircuts, the UK produces more goods and services that global markets would pay more for in aggregate. That's the ~definition. In terms of how that translates to power, that's contentious. The banal mean of nominal GDP and PPP GDP is not a bad start.
I don't understand all the folks on Twitter who think it's utterly obvious whether Britain or Russia has a bigger economy. The UK is obviously richer per capita, but Russia has more than twice as many people. It seems like a technical and nonobvious question.
22
7
200
12,198
You got it backwards. The uk has more has more turkish barbers and Russia has more hard industry factories
1
2
305
Then why are prices higher in the UK than in Russia?
30
The anthropormophising of AI, the idea it has consciousness and agency - and can go 'rogue' - is an attempt to limit liability, optimise user engagement and maximise stock value
NEW: According to a bombshell report in the New York Times, Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah threatened to walk out of Pope Leo XIV’s AI encyclical launch in May because the pope rejected the idea that machines can be conscious. Olah’s team then privately lobbied the pope’s advisers “to take the possibility of model consciousness seriously.” Pope Leo XIV held firm. For months, Anthropic has wined and dined theologians and religious scholars under nondisclosure agreements, hoping they would bless the idea that Claude has moral standing. thelettersfromleo.com/p/nyt-…
20
106
626
12,211
It doesn't do any of these except maybe user engagement by a tiny tiny bit. Trying to explain absolutely everything by ulterior motives even when it doesn't make sense is silly.
1
2
123
In the history of capitalism, I'm hard pressed to think of an example where a new technology was developed and promoted in a worse manner than AI.
Introducing Griffin, the first model to pass the video Turing test. 48% of people who talked to it live thought it was a real human. Previous systems have had a pass rate <3%. It is #1 on NVIDIA's benchmark for full-duplex AI video. It’s the first Human Interaction Model (HIM).
Community note
The 48% figure and "video Turing test" claim are from Tavus's own study of 54 one-minute calls, not independently verified or using a standard protocol. Griffin-Lite leads NVIDIA's VideoFDB benchmark on their public leaderboard. cellcog.ai/blog/tavus-gri… research.nvidia.com/labs/amri/proj… tech-ish.com/2026/10/02/tav
4
7
81
6,622
As someone who has no idea how the early trains, light bulbs, radios, and TVs were marketed, I can confidently say that I don't know how right you are.
1
104